Common use of Regular Faculty Evaluation Clause in Contracts

Regular Faculty Evaluation. Probationary Regular Faculty (a) All evaluations during the probationary period shall be as follows: at least once per year (no more than twice per year with a minimum of sixty (60) days between), the Administrator responsible will give the faculty member a written evaluation report, after consultation with the current Selection Committee. The evaluation report shall explicitly state whether the faculty member is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If the faculty member is found to be unsatisfactory for regular employment then the evaluation report shall specify the deficiencies and shall make positive suggestions for each. The standards will be determined by the College. (b) The methods used to collect information, in consultation with the faculty member, will include the following: (i) Written faculty peer evaluation (ii) Written administrator evaluation (iii) Written student evaluations (where applicable) (iv) Written self-evaluation by the probationary faculty member (v) Other methods agreed to by the Selection Committee, and by the Administrator responsible; or, at the initiative of the probationary faculty member, and in consultation with the Selection Committee and Administrator elements of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ College Teaching Excellence Program may be used to provide information relevant to the probationary evaluation. (c) The Evaluation report will be discussed with the faculty member who will sign a copy indicating that the report has been seen. The faculty member can register agreement or disagreement with the report at this time. (d) Where an evaluation has not been done, then it will be understood that a probationary or contract faculty member has received a satisfactory evaluation.

Regular Faculty Evaluation. Probationary Regular Faculty (a) All evaluations during the probationary period shall be as follows: at least once per year (no more than twice per year with a minimum of sixty (60) days between), the Administrator responsible will give the faculty member a written evaluation report, after consultation with the current Selection Committee. The evaluation report shall explicitly state whether the faculty member is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If the faculty member is found to be unsatisfactory for regular employment then the evaluation report shall specify the deficiencies and shall make positive suggestions for each. The standards will be determined by the College. (b) The methods used to collect information, in consultation with the faculty member, will include the following: (i) Written faculty peer evaluation (ii) Written administrator evaluation (iii) Written student evaluations (where applicable) (iv) Written self-evaluation by the probationary faculty member (v) Other methods agreed to by the Selection Committee, and by the Administrator responsible; or, at the initiative of the probationary faculty member, and in consultation with the Selection Committee and Administrator elements of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ College Teaching Excellence Program may be used to provide information relevant to the probationary evaluation. (c) The Evaluation report will be discussed with the faculty member who will sign a copy indicating that the report has been seen. The faculty member can register agreement or disagreement with the report at this time. (d) Where an evaluation has not been done, then it will be understood that a probationary or contract faculty member has received a satisfactory evaluation.