Regular Faculty Evaluation Sample Clauses
The Regular Faculty Evaluation clause establishes a systematic process for assessing the performance and effectiveness of faculty members on a recurring basis. Typically, this involves scheduled reviews—such as annual or biennial evaluations—where faculty are assessed on criteria like teaching quality, research output, and service contributions. The core function of this clause is to ensure accountability, support professional development, and maintain high standards within the academic institution.
Regular Faculty Evaluation. Regular faculty evaluations will occur annually and consist of the student survey, the Faculty Evaluation Document, and a review of all components of the faculty member's portfolio.
Regular Faculty Evaluation. Probationary Regular Faculty
(a) All evaluations during the probationary period shall be as follows: at least once per year (no more than twice per year with a minimum of sixty (60) days between), the Administrator responsible will give the faculty member a written evaluation report, after consultation with the current Selection Committee. The evaluation report shall explicitly state whether the faculty member is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If the faculty member is found to be unsatisfactory for regular employment then the evaluation report shall specify the deficiencies and shall make positive suggestions for each. The standards will be determined by the College.
(b) The methods used to collect information, in consultation with the faculty member, will include the following:
(i) Written faculty peer evaluation
(ii) Written administrator evaluation
(iii) Written student evaluations (where applicable)
(iv) Written self-evaluation by the probationary faculty member
(v) Other methods agreed to by the Selection Committee, and by the Administrator responsible; or, at the initiative of the probationary faculty member, and in consultation with the Selection Committee and Administrator elements of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ College Teaching Excellence Program may be used to provide information relevant to the probationary evaluation.
(c) The Evaluation report will be discussed with the faculty member who will sign a copy indicating that the report has been seen. The faculty member can register agreement or disagreement with the report at this time.
(d) Where an evaluation has not been done, then it will be understood that a probationary or contract faculty member has received a satisfactory evaluation.
Regular Faculty Evaluation