Proposed Structure Sample Clauses
Proposed Structure. GF and GMP shall request by on or about March 15, 2021, authorization as needed from the Vermont Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) to allow GMP to change its service territory to exclude a portion of the GF campus in Vermont and allow GF to operate to serve its own load obligation as a Self- Managed Utility (“SMU”), as follows:
a. The SMU shall operate as a division of GF and not as a separate legal entity (and hereinafter any reference of service to GF shall encompass service to the SMU division for GF);
b. Only GF’s land in the Town of Essex, including the Village of Essex Junction, will be excluded from GMP’s service territory, as will be further described in GMP’s filed Section 249 Petition and as depicted in the attached Exhibit MOU-2;
c. The SMU will enter into a Transitional Power Purchase Agreement with GMP for the first four years of the SMU’s operations under the terms set forth in Exhibit MOU-1;
d. The SMU will apply for transmission service under Schedule 21-VTransco;
e. GF’s land in Williston will continue to be part of GMP’s service territory;
f. The Parties shall transfer the assets as described herein, to move the metering and interface connection point between the GMP and GF system to accomplish this transaction; and
g. GF will petition the PUC to establish a SMU that serves solely GF and will not engage in the sale of electricity directly to the public.
Proposed Structure. Formation of an ongoing relationship between ▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ with the intent of increasing participation, retention, and quality of the Youth League being provided by both entities. As such the Towns will work together to deliver high quality Youth Leagues.
Proposed Structure. Flat Fee Expense Amount Totals
Proposed Structure. Chaired by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, the JSC’s Working Committee published an extensive report in October 2012 setting forth six recommendations, the first of which called upon “the Chief Justice to establish the International Crimes Division as a division of the High Court, to prosecute the pending post-election violence cases, international and transnational crimes.”553 As with the Ugandan ICD, the legal framework for such a Division would be rooted in the unlimited original jurisdiction of the High Court, while appeals would lie with the Kenyan Court of Appeal, and in the 545 Maina Kiai, “Using International Justice to End Impunity and Prevent Further Atrocities in Kenya,” Consultative Conference on International Criminal Justice,” September 2009, 4, at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/experience/papers/Maina_Kiai_Speech_Sept10_09.pdf. 546 Ibid. 547 Wanyeki, “The International Criminal Court’s cases in Kenya: origin and impact,” 9-10. 548 Interview with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ director, Nairobi, 3 December 2012. 549 Mutuma Ruteere, “▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇: Why they fear him,” The Nairobi Law Monthly 2(6) (June 2011), 31-39. 550 Interview with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Nairobi, 16 June 2011. 551 “Judicial Service Commission – The Judiciary,” at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/portal/the-judicial- service-commission.html 552 The Judicial Service Commission, “Report of the Committee of the Judicial Service Commission on the establishment of an International Crimes Division in The High Court of Kenya” (30 October 2012), 32 (“JSC Report”) (on-file). 553 Ibid.,146. Section 8(2) of the International Crimes Act No. 16 of 2008 grants Kenya’s High Court jurisdiction to conduct trials over persons responsible for international crimes committed locally or abroad by a Kenyan, or committed in any place against a Kenyan as of January 2009. See chapter six for further discussion. final instance, the Supreme Court. The Division’s proposed subject matter jurisdiction would include Rome Statute crimes (domesticated under the Kenyan International Crimes Act 2008), but could be expanded to include transnational crimes as well: money laundering, cyber-laundering, human trafficking, terrorism, and piracy. Other recommendations include the establishment of an independent prosecution unit with the DPP “to deal exclusively with international crimes,” fully funding the country’s existing (if underfunded) Witness Protection Agency, and setting up a “special fund to help victims.”554 The Commission’s ...
Proposed Structure. Following consultation, we are proposing the following proposed two (2) stream, ten (10) level structure with a separate library stream: TEACHING AND LEARNING SUPPORT STREAM The Teaching and Learning Support Stream will include positions whose primary directly supporting teaching and learning in TAFE NSW Institutes. This would include tasks involved in direct class preparation and delivery such as class support and technical support to teachers and students. BUSINESS SUPPORT STREAM The business support stream will include positions whose primary focus is on supporting the efficient operations of the TAFE NSW Institutes but who do not directly support teaching and learning delivery. This would include direct and indirect customer service, managerial, clerical and support roles, maintenance, security and child care. LIBRARY STREAM The Library Stream will include positions whose primary focus is on the efficient management of TAFE NSW Libraries. This stream would include Librarians and other library support employees.
Proposed Structure. A Central Facility Supporting Localized Nodes Fiscal Sponsorship with the International Land and Forest Tenure Facility The Marine Tenure Facility envisions scaling its work overtime and starting its grantmaking and service provision whilst under a fiscal sponsorship relationship with the Land and Forest Tenure Facility. Governance The Steering Committee will also be responsible for nominating and approving grants at the global level and from the Rapid Response and Knowledge and Learning Funds, or creating proxy structures. The MTF Steering Committee provides robust accountability, ensuring the Facility design and implementation directly supports the interests of tenure rights holders—Indigenous Peoples, coastal communities, and small-scale fishers and other users. The Steering Committee has governed the initiative since the first months of its inception and is critical to the legitimacy and efficacy of the Facility, serving as one key governance attribute. The technical team remains responsive and accountable to the Steering Committee, which provides guidance to strategy and decision making.