Project Narrative. (Unless specified in the "H. Other Information" section, maximum of 20 pages, single spaced, 12 point font, 1-inch margins, number all pages. This includes the work plan. Content beyond the specified page number will not be reviewed.) Applicants must submit a Project Narrative with the application forms. Applicants must name this file “Project Narrative” and upload it at xxx.xxxxxx.xxx. The Project Narrative must include all of the following headings (including subheadings): Background, Approach, Applicant Evaluation and Performance Measurement Plan, Organizational Capacity of Applicants to Implement the Approach, and Work Plan. The Project Narrative must be succinct, self-explanatory, and in the order outlined in this section. It must address outcomes and activities to be conducted over the entire period of performance as identified in the CDC Project Description section. Applicants should use the federal plain language guidelines and Clear Communication Index to respond to this Notice of Funding Opportunity. Note that recipients should also use these tools when creating public communication materials supported by this NOFO. Failure to follow the guidance and format may negatively impact scoring of the application.
Project Narrative. Each page must be numbered and have one-inch margins. The text of the project narrative must be single spaced and typed in a standard typeface (e.g., Times New Roman, Arial, Courier) with no smaller than 12-point font. The project narrative must not exceed ten (10) pages. This page limitation applies to the project narrative only. Include the following in the Project Narrative:
Project Narrative. The interim report shall highlight anticipated outcomes and actual milestones. The final report summary shall describe the project as completed. Summarize the project activities. Include its accomplishments, successes, challenges, and collaboration activities, as appropriate. • Describe the approach for structuring and organizing the ROI analysis. • Were subject matter experts involved? What is their role? • List major deviations from the original proposal and explain rationale. • Describe how challenges were identified and what steps were taken to overcome them. • For the interim report address your project schedule. Will you finish on time? • For the interim report please attach a draft ROI Case study and related documents. • For the final report, identify completed activities and activities planned after the award is complete. • For the final report, please attach final ROI Case study and related documents to report Photographs, graphics, or illustrations of the project are highly desirable. If available please include a few. Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program (To be completed for the final report) • What are the CAP Program strengths and weaknesses? • Where did it make a difference to your State? • Was the assistance you received sufficient or effective? • What would you recommend that the FGDC do differently? • Are there factors that are missing or additional needs that should be considered? • Are there program management concerns that need to be addressed, such as the time frame? • If you were to do the project again, what would you do differently? NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program
Project Narrative. The scope of work as originally planned was ….… The following changes were made to the scope of work…… The following amendments with dates and reason for amendment were made for this project…. The following is a brief description of the expenditures on this project …. The following explains the differences between originally planned costs and actual costs. .
Project Narrative. A. Demonstration of Past Progress in Exchange Planning Core Areas Background Research: Washington State currently has rich information on state-wide coverage and individual demographics. Federal exchange planning grants funds were needed to develop a Market Impact Analysis report on three key issues that could alter the structure of Washington State’s health insurance markets: merging the individual and small group risk pools, redefining the small group market as 1-100 employees, or selecting the Federal Basic Health program. Additionally, the Office of Financial Management that conducts the Washington State Population Survey analyzed the 2010 survey by populations likely to go into the exchange and Medicaid to identify their insurance status, health status, and income levels. They are using that information for further analysis of other data sources.
Project Narrative. This section provides a comprehensive framework and description of all aspects of the proposed project. It should be succinct, self-explanatory and well organized so that reviewers can understand the proposed project. Successful applications will contain the information below. Please use the following section headers for the narrative:
Project Narrative. This section provides a comprehensive framework and description of all aspects of the proposed project. It should be succinct, self-explanatory and well organized so that reviewers can understand the proposed project. Use the following section headers for the Narrative: INTRODUCTION -- Corresponds to Section V’s Review Criterion #1(Need) Propose at least one area of concentration that the RHRC will focus on throughout the 4- year award cycle and briefly explain how the chosen topic(s) aligns with FORHP’s charge as specified in Section 711 of the Social Security Act, as well as other emerging and historic health policy issues. Applicants may propose to focus their work around one area of concentration for the entire RHRC, or they may propose to include multiple areas of concentration that draw on the varied expertise of their key personnel. The topic(s) of concentration must be policy-relevant and of enduring interest and importance to rural providers, rural stakeholders and/or the health of rural communities. FORHP is particularly interested in areas of concentration that capture hospital payment and policy, primary care payment and policy, post-acute care, quality, workforce (including training and retention programs such as rural training tracks), health information technology, Medicare (including Medicare Advantage) and Medicaid, pharmacy and prescription drug policy, insurance provisions, ambulance and emergency medical services (EMS) policy, mental and behavioral health, health disparities, and ongoing activities related to the transition from volume to value and the expansion of coverage through the Affordable Care Act. NEEDS ASSESSMENT -- Corresponds to Section V’s Review Criterion #1 (Need) The RHRCs have the important task of analyzing the possible effects of policy on the 57 million residents of rural communities in the United States. Applicants must demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the needs of the rural population as they pertain to health and health care services. Applicants should also demonstrate a strong understanding of the unique characteristics of rural communities from a health care service, payment and provider point of view as well as why rural residents are considered an underserved population. The issues and challenges facing rural communities and health care providers , as well as the associated factors that contribute to those challenges should be clearly articulated. This section should demonstrate how the applica...
Project Narrative. The Project Narrative is a description of your proposed project. Please respond to the items in this section according to the SHP program you propose to carry out, using the numbering below. Project summary. Please provide the following:
Project Narrative. This section is a description of your proposed project. Please respond to all of the items in this section. A project may include no more than one component and may be carried out by no more than one project sponsor.
Project Narrative. The Public Hospital must include a narrative for each project that describes the following elements of the project: Goals: A description of the goal(s) of the project, which describes the challenges of the Public Hospital system and the major solution identified to address those challenges by implementing the particular project; Rationale: A narrative on the Public Hospital’s rationale for selecting the project, milestones, and metrics based on relevancy to the hospital system’s population and circumstances, community need, and hospital system priority and starting point with available baseline data, as well as a description of how the project represents a new initiative for the hospital system or significantly enhances an existing initiative including any initiatives that may have related activities that are funded by the U.S Department of Health and Human Services; Expected Results: A description of the target goal over the demonstration approval period and metrics associated with the project and the significance of that goal to the Public Hospital system and its patients. The goals for the at-risk outcomes and improvement indicators must be developed using the gap-to-goal and improvement measurement methodology, as specified in the approved Public Hospital PHTII plan and described in Section VI, paragraph 14; and Relationship to Other Projects: A narrative describing how this project supports, reinforces, enables and is related to other projects and interventions within the Public Hospital PHTII plan.
