Program Recommendations Clause Samples
The Program Recommendations clause outlines the process by which one party may suggest changes, improvements, or additions to a program or service covered by the agreement. Typically, this clause specifies how recommendations should be submitted, who reviews them, and whether there is any obligation to implement the suggestions. Its core function is to provide a structured mechanism for ongoing program enhancement, ensuring that feedback can be formally considered and potentially integrated to improve outcomes or address emerging needs.
Program Recommendations. The purpose of Task 4.3 is to inventory existing safety programs in the City of Fresno, and to make recommendations for new or revised programs. We will begin Task 4.3 with an inventory of existing enforcement, evaluation, education, encouragement, and data collection programs. We will also review the program recommendations in prior plans, to understand which have been successful, and which faced implementation barriers. Past plans for review may include the 2020 Systemic Local Roadway Safety Plan, the 2018 Fresno Safe Routes to School Action Plan, and the 2017 Active Transportation Plan We will cross-check existing programs against the most pressing safety concerns identified in Tasks 2 and 3. Through this process, we will develop a list of high-impact programmatic interventions that will move the needle on safety in Fresno. We will present the recommendations in a draft memorandum. Finalized recommendations will be integrated directly into the Vision Zero Action Plan during Task 5.
Program Recommendations. Evaluation of and recommendations for improvements in the EEO and Upward Mobility Programs are appropriate topics for discussion between the Union and the Employer.
Program Recommendations. To benefit fully from the various features of the Honors Program, students are strongly encouraged to:
Program Recommendations. Review of programs and recommendations for improvements in the EEO program are appropriate topics for discussion between the Union and the Employer.
Program Recommendations. The country evaluation narratives spell out six recommendations held in common:
a) Continued HOPE Center support for VHB operations: financial and budgetary support from HQ for FY04 to enable the project to continue.
b) Improved Adult Education: consolidating the gains of the new health education philosophy on health talks (except Peru where the observation is “keep up the good work.”)
c) Improved health data collection: collect baseline information on health just as economic information is collected at the start of a woman’s participation in VHB, to be measured four cycles later.
d) Improved income data collection: collect baseline income information at the start of a woman’s participation, and measure all clients, not just a sample, four cycles later.
e) Improved loan making: consider moving into occasional supervision of individual loan applications and perhaps begin talks on better business planning (as Malawi is doing.)
f) Continued search for operational sustainability: cost savings and efficiencies. Two other recommendations are country specific: In Malawi: Continued presence in Mulanje, and hiring an Adult health Educator. In Peru: Creation of a new program strategy.