Program Assessment Clause Samples

Program Assessment. Installer collects, analyzes, and disseminates data about our programs on an anonymized or de- identified basis. This helps Installer evaluate the effectiveness of its programs, comply with its external reporting obligations to funders and funding programs, and carry out its internal and external communication efforts. Installer is also required to share your information with DOEE and its designees. By signing this Agreement, you consent to the disclosure and use of your information as outlined above.

Program Assessment. 12.1 High school teacher/advisor assigned to this program will meet regularly with the appropriate College Connection Counselor, FUSD Secondary Education Director, and Ohlone ▇▇▇▇ of Special Projects-Dual Enrollment in order to assess the progress of the program. It is the responsibility of the high school teacher/advisor, with the support of all participating high school and college record-keeping departments, to supply data needed to develop necessary information for evaluation purposes.

Program Assessment. ISD shall cooperate with WANIC in the assessment of the impact of the program as requested by WANIC.

Program Assessment. 12.1 High school teachers and counselors assigned to this program will meet regularly with the appropriate Ohlone College Connection Counselor, NHUSD staff member, and Ohlone Academic Affairs Representative in order to assess the progress of the program. It is the responsibility of the high school teacher/advisor, with the support of all participating high school and college record-keeping departments, to supply data needed to develop necessary information for evaluation purposes.

Program Assessment. The objective of FHWA’s risk management process is to establish a consistent approach to identify and prioritize program area risks. Applying the principles of risk makes it possible to identify threats and opportunities; assess and prioritize those threats and opportunities; and determine and prioritize strategies so that we can decide how to address future issues affecting the Federal-aid Highway Programs. MoDOT Design-Build staff and FHWA agree to coordinated yearly meetings to identify Design-Build Program risk areas for the next performance year. The Design Program Risk Assessment process identified the following top three risks for PY20 (performance year): • ADA/Pedestrian Accommodations in Work Zones • Staffing Levels, Experience, and Knowledge • Environmental Commitments in PCEs The Construction & Materials Program Risk Assessment process identified the following top three risks for PY20 (performance year): • Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECPs) • Time Extensions & Liquidated Damages (LDs) • Material Sample Chain of Custody The Highway Safety and Traffic Program Risk Assessment process identified the following top four risks for PY20 (performance year): • Fatalities and Serious Injuries on Missouri Roadways • Implementation of TSMO Strategies • Workforce Development • Policy Review and Updates in EPG MoDOT and FHWA agree to partner together to identify strategies to help mitigate these risks.

Program Assessment. This will be based on an assessment that identifies strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities and the identification and sharing of “best” practices to continually improve the program. FHWA Program Managers in each area will consult with their Mn/DOT counterparts in conducting annual program assessments on those programs related to their stewardship responsibilities.

Program Assessment. The SRO Program will be assessed annually, and the evaluation will be conducted jointly between the police department and the District. By June 30 of every year, the police department shall provide the District a report from the previous school year. The following areas, at a minimum, will be used to evaluate the program: • Overview of the police department’s school resource officer unit • Training attended • Training conducted • Meetings attended • Statistics, arrests/referrals • Highlights and accomplishments Each officer’s effectiveness in the program will be discussed at the end of each school year in a joint meeting between the police department and the school District. The District and the police department will discuss program effectiveness. This may include a recommendation by the District to the City Chief of Police that an officer maintains their current school assignment, an officer is moved to another District school determined to be a better fit for both officer and the District or that an officer not be assigned to any District school. If during the school year there is a concern with the effectiveness of the SRO program, the District, Chief of Police, and site principal/administrator shall meet and confer to determine the best course of action. This may include any of the actions described above.

Program Assessment. The costs of each program, as determined by the Executive Director and approved by the Board shall be assessed to member school committees on the basis of the number of pupils enrolled in each program from the respective school committees.

Program Assessment. The program will be reviewed every five years to evaluate the progress and to improve the quality of exchange mechanism. This Agreement may be terminated by either party providing the other through a written notice of its intent to terminate. Such notice shall be given at least one (1) year prior to the effective date of the termination. Such termination shall not affect the dual PhD program students in effect prior to the effective date of the termination. In witness whereof, the universities hereto have offered their signatures: Project Director: Project Director & Liaison Professor: ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Dr. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Signature: Date: 31 Aug. 2020 Signature: Date: September 24, 2020 Graduate Program Director/Head, BSBE: Graduate Program Director: