Probationary reviews Clause Samples

Probationary reviews. Reviews of staff on a probationary appointment will be undertaken according to the appropriate Classification Standards set out in Schedules 1 and 2 and the relevant University policies, procedures and guidelines as amended from time to time.

Probationary reviews. The probationary Employee shall be subject to two (2) written reviews before the end of the probation period, conducted by the Executive Director. The first review shall take place approximately midway through the probationary period. The second review shall take place approximately one (1) week prior to the end of the probationary period. These reviews will evaluate the performance of the Employee with respect to the duties, responsibilities, and desired qualifications listed in the initial employment notice. In the case of an Emergency Relief Employee, Government Funded Employee or a Student Employee, a single probationary review shall take place approximately half way through the probationary period. (a) Based on the results of the final review, the Executive Director shall determine whether the Employee has successfully completed the probationary period. (b) Written notification of the results of the final review shall be presented to the Employee and the Job ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ within seven (7) days following the review. (c) In the event that either review is not carried out; the probationary Employee shall be deemed to have successfully completed the probationary period and shall be automatically reclassified to "Permanent" status as hired, at the expiration of the probationary period.

Probationary reviews. The supervisor and employee will normally discuss and clarify performance expectations within the first week of commencement of employment, and the probation period should include at least 1 probationary review at or about the midpoint plus the final review of the employee’s overall performance.

Probationary reviews. In the review for probationary faculty, highest emphasis is placed on “teaching” and “scholarship and creative activities” achievement, and lesser emphasis is placed on “service” achievement. Progress across successive reviews should be documented.