PRICE EVALUATION. For the purpose of evaluation, and for no other purpose, the Government will evaluate prices submitted on the basis that the Government will require the estimated quantities shown in Section B of this solicitation. The Government will add the prices for standard services, temporary additional services, and materials/equipment to obtain a total price evaluation
PRICE EVALUATION. For the purpose of evaluation, and for no other purpose, evaluation of prices submitted will be made on the basis that the Government will order the estimated quantities shown in Section B – SERVICES AND PRICES, of this solicitation. M.8. SEPARATE CHARGES Separate charges, in any form, are not solicited. For example, proposals containing any charges for failure of the Government to exercise any options will be rejected. The Government shall not be obligated to pay any charges other than the contract price, including any exercised options.
PRICE EVALUATION. For the purpose of evaluation, and for no other purpose, evaluation of prices submitted will be made on the basis that the Government will order the estimated quantities shown in Section B – SERVICES AND PRICES, of this solicitation. The price evaluation will not include the price of any riders.
PRICE EVALUATION. The price proposals in a submitted Bid shall be evaluated on the basis of the lowest and best bid pursuant to Ohio Revised Code 307.86. Bids, which are not lowest and best pursuant to Ohio Revised Code 307.86 will be disqualified. The Bid award shall be made to the Bidder(s) whose Bid(s):
PRICE EVALUATION. In addition to the criteria listed in ITT 34.2 (a)–(d) the following criteria shall apply:
PRICE EVALUATION. The Government will evaluate prices as submitted in the electronic Price Tables (spreadsheets) to determine price competitiveness. As part of this evaluation, the Government will calculate the Average Price Per Unit (APPU) and Total Evaluated Price (TEP) to the government for each Quotation using the submitted pricing and the Bid Model described below. The Bid Model will weight the pricing received by year over the period of performance. Weighting is specified below in Table 5-1. Table 5-1 Price Weighting Per Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Weighting 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.3 The Government’s Price Evaluation will use previously identified estimated volumes from Section 4.9 (Estimated Federal Agencies’ VolumesEstimated Federal Agencies’ Volumes). For all pricing, including as available items, the Government may compare the submitted pricing to commercially available pricing and against each other. Offerors are advised that all quoted prices may be subject to price analysis, regardless of whether they are specifically included in the APPU or TEP components of the Bid Model. Any significant risk to the Government of unacceptably higher comparative costs, resulting from potential future traffic volumes and patterns not represented in the information provided to the Offerors, will be reflected in the analysis. As demonstrated through their responses to Sections 3.10 and 3.11, Offerors’ Quotations that ensure more competitive pricing across government and throughout the term of the agreement will be identified as greater value under the planned Best Value Quotation evaluation. The Government has developed a Bid Model that it will utilize as part of its price evaluation. For evaluation purposes only, the Bid Model provides estimated volumes for CLINs expected to represent the highest sales demand. These include all voice, data, and data add-on plans (see Figure 5-1 below), including selected features. This Bid Model will be used to develop the Offeror’s Average Price Per Unit (APPU) and Total Evaluated Price by taking the usage and multiplying by the Offeror’s prices. The Total Evaluated Price (TEP) may also consider any credits or additional charges that arise from the Offeror’s quotation that are not captured in the electronic Price Table spreadsheets. All Plans Voice Plans Data Plans Metered Metered Data Add-On 100 Min Pooled 50 MB Data Add-On Metered 50 MB 400 Min Pooled 500 MB 500 MB Data Add-On 900 Min Pooled 5 GB 5 GB Data Add-On Unlimited Unlimited Unl...
PRICE EVALUATION. The lowest price will be determined by adding all the offered prices to reach a total price. Since no estimated quantities are provided, unit prices will simply be added together to reach a total price, for evaluation purposes. This addition will be done for each period of performance, arriving at a grand total. The Government reserves the right to reject quotations that are unreasonably low or high in price.
PRICE EVALUATION. Numerical Machining Complex Ltd shall compare the evaluated costs of all substantially responsive tenders and rank them. The lowest evaluated tender will be ranked as No. 1.
PRICE EVALUATION. In the second stage the price proposals of all contractors who attained minimum 70% of the maximum score (490 points and more) for the technical evaluation will be reviewed. Arithmetical errors will be rectified on the following basis: if there is a discrepancy between the unit price and the total price, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected. If the Bidder does not accept the correction of errors, its Proposal will be rejected. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures the amount in words will prevail. The finance scoring will be calculated on the base of comparison of the amounts “A” proposed in the price schedule (total amount of the services for organizing events (please see Xxxxx X)). The lowest cost financial proposal (out of technically compliant) will be awarded the maximum score - 300 points. All the other financial proposals will receive a number of points inversely proportional to their quoted price, e.g. (300 points )X (lowest price)/(quoted price).
PRICE EVALUATION. Price will account for xx% of the overall score. Tenderers must submit prices for each of the requirements detailed within the Pricing Schedule (Appendix 2). Tenderers should complete the Pricing Schedule (Appendix 2) with details of their proposed costs. The Tenderer submitting the lowest proposed cost will receive the full xx% price weighting. All other tenderers will receive a proportion of the xx% dependent upon the relative position of their price to the lowest priced bid. For example, where a Tenderer submits a proposed cost that is 10% more expensive than the lowest price bid, they will receive 10% less weighting than the lowest price, i.e. xx% of the total xx% weighting.
