Preparatory Phase. This phase shall be performed prior to beginning work on each definable feature of work, after all required plans/documents/materials are approved/accepted, and after copies are at the work site. This phase shall include:
Preparatory Phase. All the evaluators will be aware of the input necessary to perform the cognitive walkthrough inspection, namely: the user population, the tasks, the action sequence for each task, and the interface.
Preparatory Phase. Between 2012 and 2014, four meetings of the focal points appointed by the governments of the signatory countries of the Declaration on the application of Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean were held (see table I.1). 3 A/CONF.216/13. Diagram I.1 The road to Escazú Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Table I.1 Preparatory phase Meetings of the focal points Adopted documents First meeting (Santiago, 2012) Road map Second meeting (Guadalajara, Mexico, April 2013) Plan of action to 2014 Third meeting (Lima, October 2013) Lima Vision Priority lines of action for capacity-building and cooperation Fourth meeting (Santiago, November 2014) San Xxxx Content Santiago Decision Beginning of negotiation phase Source: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). At these meetings, the countries adopted the following foundational documents:
Preparatory Phase. Notify the Contracting Officer or designated representative at least 2 working days in advance of each preparatory phase. Conduct the preparatory phase with the superintendent and the xxxxxxx responsible for the definable feature of work. Document the results of the preparatory phase actions in the Contractor Daily Quality Control Report. Perform the following prior to beginning work on each definable feature of work:
Preparatory Phase. This covers the period of employment from the date of commencement of your employment with the Employing Organisation until you successfully complete the Induction and Refresher assessments. During the preparatory phase you agree not to enter any other paid or voluntary employment or engagement without prior agreement in writing from your Employing Organisation. For the preparatory phase, until you complete the I&R assessments, the Employing Organisation agrees to pay you an International GP Programme salary of £3,000 per month. This is the net figure. Those working in London will be paid an additional weighting. The preparatory phase is to be completed within the Employing Organisation or another wider NHS placement. A wider NHS placement that meets the learning needs of the participant could be accommodated via a secondment arrangement. The preparatory phase will comprise of undertaking shadowing, training and other exercises required to produce familiarisation with the processes, procedures and approaches relating to primary care and other interlinking NHS and non NHS organisations, ensuring you are sufficiently prepared to undertake the I&R assessments and commence the I&R scheme period. Where the Employing Organisation is not an individual practice, the Employing Organisation agree that you will not work in isolation or across multiple sites for the duration of the Preparatory Phase. Where the Employing Organisation has multiple sites, you will be based at one primary practice and working across sites will only be allowable as part of the agreed training and development programme with you. At all times on-site senior clinical support will be available to you. The anticipated length of the preparatory phase is agreed between you, your Clinical Supervisor and your Educational Supervisor, as specified in Appendix A. For the completion of the preparatory phase and progression to I&R scheme phase, you must be able to evidence completion of the required preparatory work and successfully undertaking the I&R assessments, which include two ‘multiple-choice questions’ (MCQ) exams and if appropriate the ‘simulated surgery’. These assessments must be undertaken in accordance with Health Education England guidelines. During the preparatory phase, if you wish to cease employment with the Employing Organisation and withdraw from the International GP Recruitment Programme you should discuss this firstly with your Clinical Supervisor and/or Educational Supervisor. You...
Preparatory Phase. The Steering Committee (SC) was created. Finalisation of the Final Project Proposal (FPP) was ensured. According to the project outline the analysis of employers´ requirements was supposed to be carried out. Considering to time- demandingness of the activity and shortened time of the preparatory phase, the activity will be carried out in Activity 2. In order to select study and vocational fields for realisation of pilot activities, the Analysis of current situation within the system of educational fields in selected groups of fields was prepared (in Annex 17). On the base of the analysis results activities were specified. Comments of NCP were incorporated. Activities of the project partner were specified, working meetings with partners representatives (1 business trip, e-mail and phone consultations) were realised. The partner provided professional and counselling activities at the stage of processing Final Project Proposal. The updating of EHB methodology for employers´ requirements analysis and training of experts from SR will be carried out in Activity 2. Activities were ensured 1. by own skilled manpower in permanent employment (free of charge), 2. manpower hired only for purpose of the project (working groups), 3. consultants from Switzerland and 4. externally. Activity 2 Creation, stimulation and development of the cooperation among individual subject in Vocational Education and Training, employer, professional, guild organisation, sectoral council for VET , secondary technical school
Preparatory Phase. Case studies and testing (Oct–Dec 2011) 4
Preparatory Phase. Case studies and testing (Oct–Dec 2011) Before the first core survey can be implemented, the ENUMERATE methodology will be tested against some case studies across the full Cultural Heritage domain in Europe. In the Description of Work, the Consortium Member TEL, The European Library service, managed by CENL, had already indicated to provide a case for ENUMERATE, as they are approximately at the same time implementing statistical surveys on the digital collections of the contributing partners to support their work on key performance indicators. Other cases will be identified below, taking the experiences from the Numeric framework into account. These ‘reporting scenarios’ will be used to define and refine the ENUMERATE Conceptual Framework.
Preparatory Phase. Consensus/will building: There was a consensus/will building session with facility leaders before discussion on initiating QI activities. The purpose of consensus building was to activate leaders, establish readiness for QA/QI processes and to orient them on scope of work for the QI team that will be established. Establish and strengthen the QI team at health facilities: Support will be provided to facilities to establish Quality Improvement Team/QIT/. Primary hospitals have QI teams but they are not functional and it is an opportunity to strengthen and revitalize the team. The health centers have used their performance monitoring team/PMT/ as QI team with some modification to include major/key functions of the health center. Baseline assessment: The project conducted self-assessment baseline clinical auditing using comprehensive MNH self-assessment tool composed of set standards and criteria related to MNH service delivery. In the primary hospital, the project supported the QI team using the clinical audit tool developed by FMOH for hospitals. Health centers were assessed using modified self-assessment clinical audit tool that considers major clinical areas, health post linkage and community linkage including CSC and baseline data on KPI. The national MNH self-assessment clinical audit tool aimed at establishing a baseline data of which subsequent progresses will be measured and compared against the baseline data. Data for the last six months on selected MNH service indicators was collected as indicated below for all the facilities to serve as a baseline data to track improvement going forward. Table: The results of self- assessment clinical audits were: Region Zone/cluster Woreda Health facility Result (%) Amhara North Gondar Tacharmachiho Sanja PHL 22.2 Sanja HC 20.5 Musiebamb 7.7 North Wollo Wadla Wadla PHL 35.0 Xxxx XX 17.9 Hamusit HC 20.5 Oromia Ambo Guder Guder PHL 80.4 Xxxxx XX 24.0 Gorosole 33.0 Xxxxx Xxxxx Olenchiti PHL 70.5 Godedhera HC 18.0 Olenchite HC 13.0 Tigray Mekele HIntalo wajirat Adigudem PHL 85.0 Hewane HC 44.0 Debub HC 46.0 After the clinical audit self-assessment, the project supported the QITs on gap analysis, prioritization of identified problems, and the development of post assessment comprehensive QI action plans.
