Positive Decision Sample Clauses

Positive Decision on Environment Impact Assessment OR Statement from the relevant public authority that the latter is not needed for the specific activities OR Approved by the relevant authorities Environment Impact Assessment; the applicant and each partner (if any) are eligible in accordance with the criteria set out under sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 of the Guidelines for Applicants; if recommended to be awarded a grant, the applicant accepts the contractual conditions as laid down in the Standard Contract annexed to the Guidelines for Applicants (annex F); the applicant and its partners are aware that, for the purposes of safeguarding the financial interests of the Communities, their personal data may be transferred to internal audit services, to the European Court of Auditors, to the Financial Irregularities Panel or to the European Anti-Fraud Office. The following grant applications have been submitted (or are about to be submitted) to the European Institutions, the European Development Fund and the EU Member States in the current year: <list only actions in the same field as this proposal> The applicant is fully aware of the obligation to inform without delay the Contracting Authority to which this application is submitted if the same application for funding made to other European Commission departments or Community institutions has been approved by them after the submission of this grant application. Signed on behalf of the applicant Name Signature Position Date DECLARATION BY THE Cross-border APPLICANT The cross- border applicant, represented by the undersigned, being the authorised signatory of the cross-border applicant, including every partner, hereby declares that the cross-border applicant has the sources of financing and professional competence and qualifications specified in section 2 of the Guidelines for Applicants; the cross-border applicant undertakes to comply with the obligations foreseen in the partnership statement of the grant application form and with the principles of good partnership practice; the cross-border applicant is directly responsible for the preparation, management and implementation of the action with its partners and is not acting as an intermediary; the cross-border applicant and its partners are not in any of the situations excluding them from participating in contracts which are listed in Section 2.3.3 of the Practical Guide to contract procedures for EC external actions (available from the following Internet address: xxxx://xx.xxxxxx....
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Positive Decision on Environment Impact Assessment OR Statement from the relevant public authority that the latter is not needed for the specific activities OR Approved by the relevant authorities Environment Impact Assessment; The assessment of the eligibility has been conducted by: Date:
Positive Decision. If the consulate takes the decision to issue a visa, this will happen in accordance with article 24 VC, which mentions the notions ‘period of validity’ and ‘period of stay’. The period of validity is the period during which the visa holder may use his visa and is based on the examination of the information provided by the applicant. There might however be unexpected changes in the planning of the journey,221 in which case the period is automatically extended with a reasonable number of days: the so-called ‘period of grace’, normally
Positive Decision. Negative Decision Negative Decision Positive Decision Positive Decision Negative Decision Termination at end of appointment if tenure denied Board of Governors Arbitration
Positive Decision on Environment Impact Assessment OR (2) Statement from the relevant public authority that the latter is not needed for the specific activities OR (3) Approved by the relevant authorities Environment Impact Assessment; Certified that is a true copy Attachment 18 WBG5 Positive letter of assessment (appraisal) of the necessity and appropriateness of the action, issued by the respective RIEW; Certified that is a true copy For Serbian Applicants / Cross-border Applicants whose project involves WORKS Attachment 19 WS1 Proof of ownership or long term lease (10 years after the signature of the contract) of the land / assets. Certified that is a true copy Attachment 20 WS3 (1) Positive Decision on Environment Impact Assessment OR (2) Statement from the relevant public authority that the latter is not needed for the specific activities OR (3) Approved by the relevant authorities Environment Impact Assessment; Certified that is a true copy If the supporting documents are not provided before the set deadline (5 calendar days from the receipt of the letter sent by the Contracting Authority), the application may be rejected. Based on the verification of the supporting documents by the Evaluation Committee it will make a final recommendation to the Contracting Authorities which will decide on the award of grants.

Related to Positive Decision

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • Hearing Decision The decision of the Board shall be in writing and shall contain findings of fact and the personnel action approved, if any. The findings may reiterate the language of the pleadings or simply refer to them. The decision of the Board shall be certified to the Superintendent or designee who recommended the personnel action, and he/she shall enforce and follow this decision. A copy of the decision shall be delivered to the appellant or his/her designated representative personally or by registered mail. The decision of the Board shall be final.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Disagreement on Decision Should the parties disagree as to the meaning of the Board's decision, either party may apply to the Chairperson of the Board of Arbitration to reconvene the Board to clarify the decision, which it shall do within five (5) days.

  • Shared Decision Making 33-1 Purpose The purpose of a shared decision making program is to create an atmosphere in which decision making is a collegial, shared, process that fosters an exchange of ideas and information necessary for effective professional practice and for improved student performance. The Association and District agree to continue pursuing jointly the implementation of legitimately recognized school councils as a foundation of a shared decision-making program. All provisions of this Agreement shall continue to be in full force and effect throughout the process.

  • Positive Test Result Where there has been a positive test result in a confirmatory test and in any confirmatory retest (if the employee requested one), the Employer will do the following unless the employee has furnished a legitimate medical reason for the positive test result:

  • Positive Test results for Antibiotics AFTER Milk is collected and has caused the TANKER TO RETURN A POSITIVE RESULT . UPON CUSTOMER RISK ASSESSMENT , MILK IS ACCEPTED. Supplier will not be paid for this Milk as it has tested positive for antibiotics and is deemed to be in breach of ACM Food Safety Program (see part 6.1 for details) and Milk Quality Standards (see Table 3.1). For all positive samples (vat or Tanker) Milk collection will be suspended until a negative sample is achieved. Any subsequent positive vat samples taken during this process will not be paid for. Only after a negative sample is achieved, will ACM schedule Milk for collection. Supplier will be required to complete a CAR (Corrective Action Report) which is a requirement of ACM’s Food Safety Program. Refer to section 4.3 Management of Non‐Conformance ‐ Incident Report in the ACM Food Safety Program manual.

  • Arbitrator’s Decision 27.3.3.1 The arbitrator's decision and award shall be in writing and shall state concisely the reasons for the award, including the arbitrator's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

  • Positive Test Results In the event an employee tests positive for drug use, the employee will be provided, in writing, notice of their right to explain the test results. The employee may indicate any relevant circumstance, including over the counter or prescription medication taken within the last thirty (30) days, or any other information relevant to the reliability of, or explanation for, a positive test result.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.