Common use of Parcels Clause in Contracts

Parcels. incorporate the provisions of this agreement into their RMP and/or place designated incorporate the provisions of this plan into permits and budgets. Within 1 year BLM will Within 3 months of the signature date of the CCA, BLM will  The BLM will incorporate the provisions of this CCA or the latest amendments to this CCA into its Resource Management Plan, permitting requirements, agency planning documents and budgets. conservation areas into an ACEC.  The Conservation Team will provide an annual report on the implementation of this agreement to USFWS and the conservation team. The report will also include monitoring results and adaptive management recommendations.  All designated conservation areas on non-federal lands will be placed into a conservation easement within 1 year, and/or will be subject to county ordinance or state regulations or similar legal protection as approved by USFWS within 3 months of signing this conservation agreement.  Conservation areas on private land will only be designated for conservation with landowner agreement as a signatory to this agreement.  Uintah County will enact an ordinance with associated enforcement protocols and penalties that protect designated conservation areas from surface disturbance or other adverse impacts to the species on non-federal and non-state lands within 3 months after the signing of this CCA.  The State Institutional Trust Lands Administration (▇▇▇▇▇) will enact a regulation within 3 months after the signing of this CCA that will protect designated conservation areas from surface disturbance or other adverse impacts to the species on ▇▇▇▇▇ lands  BLM will retain all land where ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ and White River beardtongues are present including sites that may become extirpated.  Non-federal landowners will report plant losses due to surface disturbance or other impacts outside of designated conservation areas to the Conservation Team which will in turn incorporate in an annual report to the USFWS. Comment [JLB47]: I don’t think USFWS really wants this (don’t have the staff). Rather, I think a benefit to both agencies would be to have the BLM track activities in habitat and mitigation, and report this to USFWS once or twice a year, with the possible exception that if plants are expected to be lost, we will contact USFWS. Or we could just say “plants won’t be directly destroyed.” Comment [T48]: OK Comment [MGS49]: I presume this refers to the more stringent fed protections vs. state/private? Could be problematic… Comment [MGS50]: BLM will incorporate CA provisions into permitting immediately, but this will not rise to the level of amending the RMP (creating an ACEC is a planning action)…suggest it state “at the next planning cycle” instead of 1 year. Comment [T51]: When is the next planning cycle? And can you elaborate on what other regulatory mechanisms BM can provide other than permitting? Comment [MGS52]: In consultation with? Comment [T53]: We just need an appropriate regulatory mechanism. Comment [JLB54]: Unclear what this means. Comment [T55]: We are under the assumption that the private landowners will be signatories to this agreement so we want to make sure they are aware of what is being designated on their lands. Although now Enefit said that the energy companies were not going tossing the agreement but would follow county ordinance. Comment [MGS56]: Different than two bullets above? Suggest consolidating… Comment [T57]: OK Comment [MGS58]: Inconsistent with bullet 3 above. Suggest consolidating… Comment [T59]: We still want BLM to retain lands. Bullet 3 is for cases where it is congressionally mandated. I will clarify. Comment [MGS60]: I presume this refers to CA signatories? Acres or number of plants? Comment [T61]: Both  The Conservation team will track the loss of plants and habitat on non-federal lands as a result of surface disturbance and report this amount the USFWS annually.

Parcels. incorporate the provisions of this agreement into their RMP and/or place designated incorporate the provisions of this plan into permits and budgets. Within 1 year BLM will Within 3 months of the signature date of the CCA, BLM will  The BLM will incorporate the provisions of this CCA or the latest amendments to this CCA into its Resource Management Plan, permitting requirements, agency planning documents and budgets. Within 3 months of the signature date of the CCA, BLM will incorporate the provisions of this plan into permits and budgets. Within 1 year BLM will incorporate the provisions of this agreement into their RMP and/or place designated conservation areas into an ACEC.  The Conservation Team will provide an annual report on the implementation of this agreement to USFWS and the conservation team. The report will also include monitoring results and adaptive management recommendations.  All designated conservation areas on non-federal lands will be placed into a conservation easement within 1 year, and/or will be subject to county ordinance or state regulations or similar legal protection as approved by USFWS within 3 months of signing this conservation agreement.  Conservation areas on private land will only be designated for conservation with landowner agreement as a signatory to this agreement.  Uintah County will enact an ordinance with associated enforcement protocols and penalties that protect designated conservation areas from surface disturbance or other adverse impacts to the species on non-federal and non-state lands within 3 months after the signing of this CCA.  The State Institutional Trust Lands Administration (▇▇▇▇▇) will enact a regulation within 3 months after the signing of this CCA that will protect designated conservation areas from surface disturbance or other adverse impacts to the species on ▇▇▇▇▇ lands  BLM will retain all land where ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ and White River beardtongues are present including sites that may become extirpated.  Non-federal landowners will report plant losses due to surface disturbance or other impacts outside of designated conservation areas to the Conservation Team which will in turn incorporate in an annual report to the USFWS. Comment [JLB47]: I don’t think USFWS really wants this (don’t have the staff). Rather, I think a benefit to both agencies would be to have the BLM track activities in habitat and mitigation, and report this to USFWS once or twice a year, with the possible exception that if plants are expected to be lost, we will contact USFWS. Or we could just say “plants won’t be directly destroyed.” Comment [T48]: OK Comment [MGS49]: I presume this refers to the more stringent fed protections vs. state/private? Could be problematic… Comment [MGS50]: BLM will incorporate CA provisions into permitting immediately, but this will not rise to the level of amending the RMP (creating an ACEC is a planning action)…suggest it state “at the next planning cycle” instead of 1 year. Comment [T51]: When is the next planning cycle? And can you elaborate on what other regulatory mechanisms BM can provide other than permitting? Comment [MGS52]: In consultation with? Comment [T53]: We just need an appropriate regulatory mechanism. Comment [JLB54]: Unclear what this means. Comment [T55]: We are under the assumption that the private landowners will be signatories to this agreement so we want to make sure they are aware of what is being designated on their lands. Although now Enefit said that the energy companies were not going tossing the agreement but would follow county ordinance. Comment [MGS56]: Different than two bullets above? Suggest consolidating… Comment [T57]: OK Comment [MGS58]: Inconsistent with bullet 3 above. Suggest consolidating… Comment [T59]: We still want BLM to retain lands. Bullet 3 is for cases where it is congressionally mandated. I will clarify. Comment [MGS60]: I presume this refers to CA signatories? Acres or number of plants? Comment [T61]: Both  The Conservation team will track the loss of plants and habitat on non-federal lands as a result of surface disturbance and report this amount the USFWS annually.