Panel Composition Clause Samples
The Panel Composition clause defines how the members of a decision-making or adjudicative panel are selected and structured. Typically, it outlines the number of panelists, their qualifications, and the process for their appointment, such as each party choosing one member and jointly selecting a third. This clause ensures a fair and balanced panel, reducing the risk of bias and providing clarity on the dispute resolution process.
Panel Composition. 3.13.1 Testing procedures defined as “routine screen” shall include the following drugs to be tested:
1. Amphetamine (Methamphetamine)
2. Heroin (6 MAM) 3. Opiates (Codeine) / (Morphine)
Panel Composition. 1. If there are two disputing Parties, the following procedures shall apply:
(a) The panel shall comprise five members.
(b) The disputing Parties shall endeavor to decide on the chair of the panel within 15 days of the delivery of the request for the establishment of the panel. If the disputing Parties are unable to decide on the chair within this period, the disputing Party chosen by lot shall select within five days as chair an individual who is not a citizen of that Party.
(c) Within 15 days of selection of the chair, each disputing Party shall select two panelists who are citizens of the other disputing Party.
(d) If a disputing Party fails to select its panelists within that period, those panelists shall be selected by lot from among the roster members who are citizens of the other disputing Party.
2. If there are more than two disputing Parties, the following procedures apply:
(a) The panel shall comprise five members.
(b) The disputing Parties shall endeavor to decide on the chair of the panel within 15 days of the delivery of the request for the establishment of the panel and, if the disputing Parties are unable to decide on the chair within this period, the Party or Parties on the side of the dispute chosen by lot shall select within 10 days a chair who is not a citizen of that Party or those Parties.
(c) Within 15 days of selection of the chair, the responding Party shall select two panelists, one of whom is a citizen of a complaining Party, and the other of whom is a citizen of another complaining Party and the complaining Parties shall select two panelists who are citizens of the responding Party.
(d) If a disputing Party fails to select a panelist within that period, that panelist shall be selected by lot in accordance with the citizenship criteria of subparagraph (c).
3. A panelist shall normally be selected from the roster. A disputing Party may exercise a peremptory challenge against an individual not on the roster who is proposed as a panelist by a
Panel Composition. The Grievance Panel shall be composed of two (2) Association members selected by the Association and two (2) members selected by the University.
Panel Composition. 1. In this Section, the “Receipt Date” means the date on which the written notification by one Party for the establishment of a panel referred to in Article 21.6.1 is received by the other Party.
2. The panel shall be composed of three members.
3. Within 30 days after the Receipt Date or 10 days in cases of motor vehicles, each Party shall appoint a panellist and propose up to four candidates, who are neither nationals of either Party nor have their usual place of residence in the territory of either Party, to serve as the chair of the panel (hereinafter referred to as “the chair”).
4. Each Party shall notify the other Party in writing of its panel member appointment and its proposed candidates to serve as the chair. If a Party fails to appoint a panellist in accordance with this Article, the panellist shall be selected by lot from the candidates proposed by each Party to serve as the chair in accordance with paragraph 3.
5. Within 60 days after the Receipt Date or 15 days in cases of motor vehicles, the Parties shall endeavour to agree on and appoint the chair from among the candidates proposed. If the Parties are unable to agree on the chair within this time period, within an additional period of seven days, or within an additional period of four days in cases of motor vehicles, the chair shall be selected by lot from the candidates proposed by each Party in accordance with paragraph 3.
6. If a panellist appointed by a Party is unable to serve, withdraws or is removed, a replacement shall be appointed by that Party within 30 days, or within 10 days in cases of motor vehicles, failing which the replacement shall be appointed in accordance with paragraph 4. If the chair is unable to serve, withdraws or is removed, the Parties shall promptly agree on the appointment of a replacement, failing which the replacement shall be appointed by a selection by lot from among the remaining candidates previously proposed by each Party to serve as the chair in accordance with paragraph 3. If there are no remaining candidates, each Party shall propose up to three additional candidates satisfying the criteria set out in paragraph 3 and the chair shall be selected by lot from among them. In any such case, any time period applicable to the proceeding is suspended for a period beginning on the date the panellist or the chair is unable to serve, withdraws or is removed and ending on the date the replacement is selected.
7. Each panellist shall:
(a) have expertise or experience...
Panel Composition. The Panel shall comprise the following persons (each a Panel Member):
Panel Composition. The Panel shall consist of fourteen (14) members – six (6) appointed by the Federation President, six (6) appointed by the Superintendent, and two (2) appointed by the University ▇▇▇▇.
Panel Composition. The Inuvialuit Game Council (IGC) will nominate member(s) to the review panel, and the panel members appointed by the Minister will include IGC nominee(s). The Minister will consult the Inuvialuit on the appointment of the chairperson.
Panel Composition. The Panel shall consist of six (6) members – three (3) appointed by the Federation President, three (3) appointed by the Superintendent.