OVERALL EVALUATION Sample Clauses

OVERALL EVALUATION. Proposals will be evaluated in two phases: a technical evaluation to determine the acceptability of the offer to the solicitation technical requirements; and a price evaluation to determine the total evaluated price proposed by each offeror. The "total evaluated price" is the cumulative total of the base year insurance plus all option years for the total estimated quantity specified in Section B. The Government will make a responsibility determination by analyzing whether the apparent successful offeror complies with the requirements of FAR subpart 9.1, including: • Adequate financial resources or the ability to obtain them; • Ability to comply with the required performance period, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments; • Satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics; • Necessary organization, experience, and skills or the ability to obtain them; • Necessary equipment and facilities or the ability to obtain them; and • Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
OVERALL EVALUATION. Proposals will be evaluated in two phases: a technical evaluation to determine the acceptability of the offer to the solicitation technical requirements; and a price evaluation to determine the total evaluated price proposed by each offeror. The "total evaluated price" is the cumulative total of the base year insurance plus all option years for the total estimated quantity specified in Section B. The “total evaluated price” will not include any Rider pricing. The Government will make a responsibility determination by analyzing whether the apparent successful offeror complies with the requirements of FAR subpart 9.1, including: • Adequate financial resources or the ability to obtain them; • Ability to comply with the required performance period, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments; • Satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics; • Necessary organization, experience, and skills or the ability to obtain them; • Necessary equipment and facilities or the ability to obtain them; and • Be otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.
Sample 1Sample 2
OVERALL EVALUATION. At least one (1) overall evaluation of professional performance will be made and discussed by the teacher and the building Principal, Assistant Principal, or Program Director. The teacher shall have the right to make written comment on the report. Copies of the evaluation signed by the Principal, Assistant Principal or Program Director the evaluator and the teacher shall be prepared for the teacher, Principal and personnel folder.
Sample 1
OVERALL EVALUATION. After compilation of the individual scores for the criteria "Price" and "Quality", the Contract- ing Authority will multiply the score obtained for each criterion with the weighting of the criterion in question, and then add the results for the two criteria to arrive at the total, overall score.
Sample 1
OVERALL EVALUATION. Recommendation (Contract Employees Only): 2nd Year Contract Employee (Art. 12.3.5.2): 4th Year Contract Employee (Art. 12.3.5.3):
Sample 1
OVERALL EVALUATION. It is mandatory to meet each of the following criteria in order to pass certification  Projects are completed and submitted on time as per the deadlines – if a person does not complete and submit all of their projects they will not pass certification  The project deliverable is satisfactory and complete, as per review and feedback from the Certification Committee members and the business owners who donate a project. (specifics are outlined for each project as per below)  An understanding of the entrepreneur and a willingness to work with them from that place (vs. resisting or pushing back on their request) – if someone is highly resistant to the Certification process and is unwilling to participate they will not pass certification  Asking clarifying questions –in order to clarify expectations and ensure that you have all of the information that you need to successfully complete a project you will need to ask questions of the client. It may not be mandatory in all cases BUT we do require that you actively submit questions at least once in the certification process.  Offering suggestions and ideas to the client throughout the projects, as a demonstration of applying marketing mindset and being willing to “think on behalf of their business.”  Presenting solutions (not just options) to the client, being clear on what you recommend and why you are making that recommendation.
Sample 1
OVERALL EVALUATION. The evaluation of the cooperation agreement in the prepress area is considered satisfactory overall after almost three years of operation. Integrating graphic design into the respective Publications Units of the two Committees facilitated the political objective of furthering each Committee's graphic profile and brand image. Structural and operational adjustments were necessary to ensure that the new system functioned smoothly. In spite of some loss of synergy, the decentralisation of prepress activities to the two Committees' Publication Units has made it possible to focus on the particular needs of each Committee. Both CoR and EESC graphic teams strongly recommend not replacing the MAC server with a PC environment since such a change would be detrimental in terms of quality and performance and would bring only minor financial savings. To improve synergies and be able to cope with exceptionally heavy workload periods, deepening cooperation between the two Committees' design teams could be envisaged, as provided for under point 2.4 of the cooperation agreement.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
OVERALL EVALUATION. At the bottom of the evaluation report the evaluator shall indicate a composite or total evaluation of the unit member by checking one of two ratings:
Sample 1

Related to OVERALL EVALUATION

  • JOB EVALUATION The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.