Outside Assessments Clause Samples
Outside Assessments. 9.03.5.4.1 In the event an Employee's competence in his or her area(s) of scholarly activity is in question, it shall solicit opinions of specialists in the area(s) of scholarly activity from outside the University;
9.03.5.4.2 In the case of making a recommendation for the rank of Professor, assessments shall be obtained from two (2) outside specialists who hold the rank of Professor, or did before retirement, and who are expert in the area(s) of the candidate's scholarly activity. Assessors shall be chosen by the committee with due regard to the area(s) of scholarly activity and theoretical orientation specified by the candidate. One (1) assessor shall be selected from a list composed of three (3) names submitted by the candidate. One (1) assessor shall be selected from a list of three (3) names submitted by the Departmental committee. The Departmental committee may consult with the candidate as to the names on the list. Outside assessors will be required to examine relevant documentation from each of the categories of achievement outlined in the statement of standards, i.e., scholarship, teaching, and service. The candidate shall be given the opportunity to review the materials to be sent out for assessment, in order to ensure that no materials essential to the case have been omitted. The candidate will not have the right to have material withheld, nor to add material not previously considered by the Departmental committee.
9.03.5.4.3 In soliciting opinions under Article 9.03.5.4.1 or in obtaining assessments under Article 9.03.5.4.2 the CAPT shall specify that these assessments will be shown to the candidate with all identifying marks removed.
Outside Assessments. III.8.4.10.1 If the University Librarian determines that the evidence already available does not suffice to make a reasonable judgment, outside assessments may be secured in connection with the recommendation for promotion. A statement of the University Librarian's reasons for seeking such outside assessments shall be submitted to the Library Personnel Committee in every case.
III.8.4.10.2 The Library Personnel Committee may also request that the University Librarian secure such outside assessments.
III.8.4.10.3 Where such outside assessments are to be sought, the University Librarian shall give the candidate the opportunity to name one (1) of such outside assessors.
Outside Assessments. 9.03.5.4.1 In the event an Employee's competence in his or her area(s) of scholarly activity is in question, it shall solicit opinions of specialists in the area(s) of scholarly activity from outside the University;
9.03.5.4.2 In the case of making a recommendation for the rank of Professor, assessments are to be obtained from two (2) outside specialists who hold the rank of Professor, or did before retirement, and who are expert in the area(s) of the candidate's scholarly activity. Assessors are to be chosen by the committee with due regard to the area(s) of scholarly activity and theoretical orientation specified by the candidate. One (1) assessor shall be selected from a list composed of three (3) names submitted by the candidate and up to three
Outside Assessments. If the University Librarian determines that the evidence already available does not suffice to make a reasonable judgment, outside assessments may be secured in connection with the recommendation for promotion. A statement of the University Librarian's reasons for seeking such outside assessments shall be submitted to the Library Personnel Committee in every case. The Library Personnel Committee may also request that the University Librarian secure such outside assessments. Where such outside assessments are to be sought, the University Librarian shall give the candidate the opportunity to name one (1) of such outside assessors. shall review all the submissions and recommendations pertaining to the promotion in the light of the criteria set out in Appendix A, and shall have access to all materials tabled in the Library Personnel Committee. by formal vote, shall make its recommendation to the University Librarian. The University Librarian shall not vote. A recommendation against promotion which contradicts the recommendation of the Library Personnel Committee must be communicated to the Chair of the Library Personnel Committee, in writing by the University Librarian. The University Librarian shall provide the Chair with a summary of reasons for its recommendation, including the weight given in that recommendation to outside assessments. The University Librarian shall also indicate if considered any additional evidence to that considered by the Library Personnel Committee. If such evidence was considered by the University Librarian shall submit copies of it to the Library Personnel Committee. The Chair of the Library Personnel Committee, shall discuss the University communication with the Library Personnel Committee, and may ask to reconsider its recommendation. The University Librarian shall, in the case of a positive decision, so recommend to the President, who in turn shall make a recommendation to the Board. In the case of a negative decision, the University Librarian shall communicate that decision in writing to the candidate, and provide a full report on the procedure followed and the reasons for the negative decision, including the weight given to outside assessments.