Office Allocation Sample Clauses

Office Allocation. Section 321 of the Planning Code requires that projects over 25,000 gsf must seek review and approval by the Planning Commission under the Office Development Limitation.

Office Allocation. As described above, each employee will choose a work track. That track will determine the priority of need in relation to office space as follows: • Employees who have chosen the in-person work track will take priority for private, windowed offices. • Employees who have chosen the hybrid work track will get a secondary choice of office space. This may mean that these folks will share office space with others. • Employees who have chosen remote work will primarily work in communal spaces when working from the office. The ACLU of Kentucky will provide two bookable rooms for those that share an office space with others and for those who need to work from the office and are remote otherwise. Bookable rooms include the Suzy Post meeting room and the former Finance office. Employees will have the opportunity to schedule time in the Suzy Post Room in 1-hour increments. For meetings exceeding 1-hour, employees will be required to reserve consecutive time blocks. Other arrangements can be coordinated with the Admin Team. If a staff member is required to house confidential documents within their office space, but their work track does not constitute a private office, those confidential files will be housed in the private office space of a member from the same team. If feasible, this should be the department manager’s office. If an employee does not follow their work track without modifying their schedule according to Sections 1 or 2, their work track will be considered changed. This will impact office allocation as described above. The employee may not re-modify their work track until the beginning of the next fiscal year.

Office Allocation. Section 321 establishes standards for San Francisco’s Office Development Annual Limit. In determining if the proposed Cathedral Hill Campus MOB would promote the public welfare, convenience and necessity, the Commission considered the seven criteria established by Code Section 321(b)(3), and finds as follows: a. APPORTIONMENT OF OFFICE SPACE OVER THE COURSE OF THE APPROVAL PERIOD IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN A BALANCE BETWEEN ECONOMIC GROWTH ON THE ONE HAND, AND HOUSING, TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC SERVICES, ON THE OTHER.

Office Allocation. Section 321 establishes standards for San Francisco’s Office Development Annual Limit. In determining if the proposed Project would promote the public welfare, convenience and necessity, the Commission considered the seven criteria established by Code Section 321(b)(3), and finds as follows: