Ocean. In situ marine observations in the Arctic are mainly made by Arctic countries (Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and USA) for national waters and by all countries with an interest in the Arctic and some international organizations for Arctic open waters. Depending on purpose and resource availability, some monitoring activities are regular, operational and sustainable (e.g. for purposes of operational services, environment and marine resource assessment and climate change) while the others are short term, irregular and less sustainable (e.g. for purposes of research and commercial interests). The observations are collected by leading institutes/scientists of projects and programs, national, regional and global oceanographic data centres. A non-exhaustive list of the Arctic in-situ data collectors are given below: Marine Environment Data, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇- ▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇ ECDS - Environment Climate Data Sweden. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ Ifremer Coriolis. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/ Russian Research institute of Hydrometeorological Information – World Data Centre, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ National Oceanographic Data Centre, USA. http//▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Norwegian Polar Data Centre at the Norwegian Polar Institute (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/home/ Chinese National Arctic and Antarctic data centre. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/index/ Korean Polar Data Centre ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/about/intro Arctic Data Archive System, Japan. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/ Arctic Office at British Antarctic Survey, UK. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/data/our-data/data- systems/ Oceanographic Databases, Bedford Institute of Oceanography. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/science/data-donnees/base/index-en.php ArcticNet: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/data-management The Greenland Ecosystem Monitoring (GEM) Database, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇-▇-▇.▇▇/ Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/en/consultancy/scienticdatacentres/ Data portal of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Centre. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/?site=home UDASH – Unified Database for Arctic and Subarctic Hydrography, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/id/eprint/47869/ Integrated Climate Data Center - ICDC. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/1/daten/ocean.html International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) Arctic Data Committee. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ JCOMM operational observations (JCOMMOPS). ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/board Norwegian Marine Data Centre, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇/UserInterface/#/ Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute and NIERSC St.-Petersburg, ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Arctic ▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ SeaDataNet, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ ICES, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ CMEMS INSTAC: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ EMODnet-European Marine Observation Data Network, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ IASC Network on Arctic Glaciology. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇/data The Global Sea Level Observing System (GLOSS). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ OceanSITES. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/data/index.html The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ The Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program (CBMP) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ The Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks (SAON) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Arctic Data – ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ European Ocean Biogeographic Information System - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Web-based Data Publisher for Earth and Environmental Science, PANGAEA, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ Arctic Portal. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/science/arctic-data NSF Arctic data centre. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/catalog/ The H2020 INTAROS project provided an assessment of current Arctic in-situ data availabilities, together with a gap analysis (INTAROS, 2018). Unfortunately, the assessment only covers in-situ data measured or collected by project partners, i.e., observations from Norway (NPI, IMR, NIVA, NORUT, UiB, UNIS, NERSC), Denmark (AU, DTU), Poland (IOPAN), France (EGO), Canada (SIO acoustic propagation experiment) and Germany (AWI, FRAM and UDASH). A large number of databases and data centres have not been included in the INTAROS assessment. The parameters evaluated are mainly water temperature, salinity, sea level, currents, acoustics, oxygen and chl-a. There are a few datasets which have phytoplankton and optical measurements but the are not sufficient to form a basis for evaluation. The CMEMS In Situ TAC (INSTAC) is the component of the Copernicus Marine Service which ensures a consistent and reliable access to a range of in situ data for the purpose of service production and validation. INSTAC has two main objectives: To collect multi-source, multi-platform, heterogenous data, perform consistent quality control, and to distribute it in a common format (NetCDF) in near-real-time (within 24 hours) to the CMEMS Marine Forecasting Centre’s (MFC) for assimilation into their numerical ocean models. To supply the MFCs and downstream users with re-processed 25-50-year products in delayed mode. In addition to the near-real-time products, these delayed-mode products are useful for model validation or assimilation in ocean reanalysis and climate studies INSTAC is a robust distributed system operated by professional centres that have been involved in in- situ data management activities for decades. The system has proven its reliability with a mean availability of the data better than 99% over the past 4 years both at global and regional scales. The establishment of a connection to national in situ data providers together with a close collaboration with EMODnet Physics has increased the number of available platforms at global scale, from 1000 per day in 2008 to around 3500 in 2018
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Framework Service Contract
Ocean. In situ marine observations in the Arctic are mainly made by Arctic countries (Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and USA) for national waters and by all countries with an interest in the Arctic and some international organizations for Arctic open waters. Depending on purpose and resource availability, some monitoring activities are regular, operational and sustainable (e.g. for purposes of operational services, environment and marine resource assessment and climate change) while the others are short term, irregular and less sustainable (e.g. for purposes of research and commercial interests). The observations are collected by leading institutes/scientists of projects and programs, national, regional and global oceanographic data centres. A non-exhaustive list of the Arctic in-situ data collectors are given below: • Marine Environment Data, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇- ▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇ • ECDS - Environment Climate Data Sweden. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ • Ifremer Coriolis. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/ • Russian Research institute of Hydrometeorological Information – World Data Centre, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ • National Oceanographic Data Centre, USA. http//▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ • Norwegian Polar Data Centre at the Norwegian Polar Institute (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/home/ • Chinese National Arctic and Antarctic data centre. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/index/ • Korean Polar Data Centre ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/about/intro • Arctic Data Archive System, Japan. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/ • Arctic Office at British Antarctic Survey, UK. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/data/our-data/data- systems/ • Oceanographic Databases, Bedford Institute of Oceanography. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/science/data-donnees/base/index-en.php • ArcticNet: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/data-management • The Greenland Ecosystem Monitoring (GEM) Database, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇-▇-▇.▇▇/ • Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/en/consultancy/scienticdatacentres/ • Data portal of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Institute (AWI) Helmholtz Centre. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/?site=home • UDASH – Unified Database for Arctic and Subarctic Hydrography, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/id/eprint/47869/ • Integrated Climate Data Center - ICDC. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/1/daten/ocean.html • International Arctic Science Committee (IASC) Arctic Data Committee. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ • JCOMM operational observations (JCOMMOPS). ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/board • Norwegian Marine Data Centre, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇/UserInterface/#/ • Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute and NIERSC St.-Petersburg, ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ • Arctic ▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ • SeaDataNet, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ • ICES, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ • CMEMS INSTAC: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ • EMODnet-European Marine Observation Data Network, ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ • IASC Network on Arctic Glaciology. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇/data • The Global Sea Level Observing System (GLOSS). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ • Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (PSMSL). ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ • OceanSITES. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/data/index.html • The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ • Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ • The Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program (CBMP) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ • Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇ • The Sustaining Arctic Observing Networks (SAON) - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ • Arctic Data – ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ • European Ocean Biogeographic Information System - ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ • Web-based Data Publisher for Earth and Environmental Science, PANGAEA, ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/ • Arctic Portal. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/science/arctic-data • NSF Arctic data centre. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/catalog/ The H2020 INTAROS project provided an assessment of current Arctic in-situ data availabilities, together with a gap analysis (INTAROS, 2018). Unfortunately, the assessment only covers in-situ data measured or collected by project partners, i.e., observations from Norway (NPI, IMR, NIVA, NORUT, UiB, UNIS, NERSC), Denmark (AU, DTU), Poland (IOPAN), France (EGO), Canada (SIO acoustic propagation experiment) and Germany (AWI, FRAM and UDASH). A large number of databases and data centres have not been included in the INTAROS assessment. The parameters evaluated are mainly water temperature, salinity, sea level, currents, acoustics, oxygen and chl-a. There are a few datasets which have phytoplankton and optical measurements but the are not sufficient to form a basis for evaluation. The CMEMS In Situ TAC (INSTAC) is the component of the Copernicus Marine Service which ensures a consistent and reliable access to a range of in situ data for the purpose of service production and validation. INSTAC has two main objectives: • To collect multi-source, multi-platform, heterogenous data, perform consistent quality control, and to distribute it in a common format (NetCDF) in near-real-time (within 24 hours) to the CMEMS Marine Forecasting Centre’s (MFC) for assimilation into their numerical ocean models. • To supply the MFCs and downstream users with re-processed 25-50-year products in delayed mode. In addition to the near-real-time products, these delayed-mode products are useful for model validation or assimilation in ocean reanalysis and climate studies INSTAC is a robust distributed system operated by professional centres that have been involved in in- situ data management activities for decades. The system has proven its reliability with a mean availability of the data better than 99% over the past 4 years both at global and regional scales. The establishment of a connection to national in situ data providers together with a close collaboration with EMODnet Physics has increased the number of available platforms at global scale, from 1000 per day in 2008 to around 3500 in 2018
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Framework Service Contract