Normative Sample Clauses

Normative. [1] ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems [2] OSHAS 1800 Safety Management Systems [3] Occupational Health and Safety Act and Regulations (85 of 1993) [4] 36-681_Generation Plant Safety Regulation [5] 240-62196227_Eskom Life Saving Rules [6] 32-95_Environmental, Occupational Health and safety Incident Management Procedure

Normative. [1] ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems. [2] OHS Act 83 of 1995: The Occupational Health and Safety Act 83 of 1995. [3] 240-53113685: Design Review Procedure

Normative. [1] ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems. [2] ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. [3] OHS Act No.85 of 1993 and the following regulations: • Construction regulations:2014 • Asbestos regulations:2001 • Noise-induced hearing loss regulations:2003 • Hazardous biological agents regulations:2001 • General safety regulations:2003 • Facilities regulations:2004 • General administrative regulations:2003 • Driven machinery regulations:2015 [4] Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act No.130 of 1993 [5] Basic Conditions of Employment Act No.75 of 1997 [6] BS 4485 Part 2: Cooling Tower Performance Testing. [7] Asbestos regulations :2001 GNR.155 of February 2002 [8] National Environmental Management Act: Waste Act 59 of 2008 - Regulations  Waste Classification and Management Regulations, 2013  Regulation for the prohibition of the use, manufacturing, importing and exporting asbestos and asbestos containing materials, 2008  National Waste Information Regulations, 2012 [9] National Environmental Management Act: Waste Act 59 of 2008 –Norms and Standards  National Norms and Standards for the assessment of waste for landfill disposal, 2013  National Norms and Standards for disposal of waste to landfill, 2013  National Norms and Standards for the remediation of contaminated land and soil quality in the Republic of South Africa, 2014  National Norms and Standards for the storage of waste, 2013 [10] National Road Traffic Act 93 of 1996 and Regulations [11] SANS 10228 – Identification and classification of dangerous goods [12] SANS 10230 – Transportation of dangerous goods – inspection requirements for roads vehicle [13] SANS 10265 – Labelling of dangerous goods [14] SANS 10232 -1 – Transportation of dangerous goods – Emergency Information System – Road Transport [15] SANS 10232 – 3 – Transportation of dangerous goods – Emergency Information – Emergency Response Guides [16] SANS 10234 -Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) [17] SANS 10160-2: Basis of structural design and actions for buildings and industrial structures Part 2: Self-weight and imposed loads [18] SANS 1200: Standardized specification for civil engineering construction [19] SANS 2001: Construction works [20] 240-123919938: Legionella Control and Management in Water Systems [21] 240-55864767: Chemistry and Microbiology Standard for Condenser Cooling Water. [22] 240-61227267 Hot tapping of Cooling Water System Ducts Standard [23] 240-99527377: Insp...

Normative. [1] ISO 9001: Quality Management Systems [2] 240-56358993: Standard for the Maintenance of Power Transformers [3] 240-56358900: Sampling and Testing of Mineral Insulating Oil for Power Transformers Within Generation Division Standard [4] 240-87435066: Kusile Power Station Power Transformer Maintenance Strategy

Normative. The following references are indispensable: [1] ANSI N18.2, Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Stationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plants, 1973. [2] ANSI/ANS N-18.2a ANS, Revision and addendum to nuclear safety criteria for the design of stationary Pressurised Water Reactor plants ANSI N18.2 (1973), 1975 [3] ANSI N45.2.11-1974, ANS, Quality Assurance Requirements for the Design of Nuclear Power Plants, 1974 [4] ANSI / ANS 51.1, ANS, Nuclear Safety Criteria for the Design of Stationary Pressurized Water Reactor Plants, 1983. (Replaced by ANS 58.14) [5] ANSI 57.2-1983, ANS, Design Requirements for Light Water Reactor Spent Fuel Storage Facilities at Nuclear Power Plants, 1983 – WITHDRAWN [6] ANSI/ANS 57.2, ANS, Design Requirements for Fuel Storage Facilities at Light Water Reactor Plants, 2000 (or latest approved revision) [7] ANSI/ANS 57.3 (Supersedes ANSI/ANS 57.2 for Dry Casks), ANS, Design Requirements for New Fuel Storage Facilities at Light Water Reactor Plants, 2018 [8] ANSI/ANS 58.14 (Supersedes ANSI N18.2 and 51.1), ANS, Safety and Pressure Integrity Classification Criteria for Light Water Reactors, 2011 [9] ANSI/ANS-58.8 ANS, Time response design criteria for safety-related operator actions, 1994. [10] ANSI/ANS-58.9 ANS, Single failure criteria for light water reactor safety-related fluid systems, 1981 [11] ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, 1971, and recent. [12] Eskom 238-8, Nuclear Safety and Quality Manual [13] Eskom DSG 238-107, Quality Requirements for the Procurement of Assets, Products and Services [14] Eskom 240-131416264, Eskom’s spent fuel management strategy [15] Eskom 240-134382460, SRA-III PSR Basis Document (3rd Periodic Safety Review for Koeberg Power Station) [16] Eskom 240-44174997, Long Term Records Preservation Standard [17] Xxxxx 00-000, Xxxxxxx Licensing Basis Document, Rev 2, 2019 [18] Eskom 331-2, Nuclear Engineering Management Manual [19] Eskom 331-64 (KGA-046), Guideline for Safety Issue Categorisation [20] IAEA G-2.3 IAEA, Modifications to Nuclear Power Plants, 2001 [21] XXXX X-0.0, XXXX Safety Guide, Core Management and Fuel Handling for Nuclear Power Plants, 2002. [22] IAEA GS-G-4.1, IAEA, Format and Content of the Safety Analysis report for Nuclear Power Plants, 2004 [23] IAEA GSG-9 IAEA General Safety Guide, Regulatory control of radioactive discharges to the environment [24] IAEA GSG-10 IAEA General Safety Guide, Prospective radiological impact assessment for facilities and activities [25] IAE...

Normative. [1] ISO 9001 Quality Management Systems. [2] Construction Regulations, 2014 [3] 32-727 - Eskom Safety, Health, Environment and Quality (SHEQ) Policy [4] Occupational Health and Safety Act No. 85 of 1993, [5] ENV/GEN/WI/12 – Waste Management

Normative i. The challenge The ANPDF’s growth-focused development strategy is grounded in well-established norms, such as the principles of inclusivity and equality. It highlights the Government’s commitment to ensuring fair and equitable geographic, gender, ethnic, and social balance in national policies and programmes. Through the ANPDF, the Government continues its progress on: eliminating poverty; supporting human capital; establishing the rule of law; and, ending corruption, criminality and violence – core areas that enable the full enjoyment of the constitutionally protected rights of every Afghan. In its work to achieve self-reliance and increase the welfare of every Afghan, the ANPDF articulates a commitment to equality, inclusivity, non-discrimination and social justice, fundamental rights that are well established in international norms, treaties and standards. The UN in Afghanistan supports the implementation of the ANPDF by working with the Government of Afghanistan to develop and ensure full implementation of legislation, policies and programmes which observe international norms and standards, including multilateral agreements. At the request of government, the UN in Afghanistan will continue its normative support, with particular focus on education; food security, nutrition and livelihoods; health; return and reintegration; rule of law; and human rights advocacy and protection. While UN normative support to the Government is not resource intensive, its impact on the country’s standing in the international community is extremely important, as it brings Afghanistan’s policy and legal frameworks into the membership of states that adhere to globally accepted human rights, including in the environmental, labour, development and international security domains. The UN pays attention, also, to gender equality and people living with disability. Norm and standard-setting and dissemination of public policy lessons and best practice are core responsibilities of the UN. There are universal norms that are mandatory for the Members States who ratified them as well as the UN itself, as well as sector-specific mandates for respective UN agency to act as custodians of specific norms. There are almost no alternatives or substitutes in other inter- governmental organizations (although some also developed human rights instruments) or in for profit providers (management consultancies and others) to the services provided by the UN in the field of normative work. All UN agenc...