Negation Sample Clauses

Negation. Licensee acknowledges that, before the effective date of this License Agreement, Licensee controlled the Intellectual Property, and that it is therefore reasonable for Licensor to not provide any representations or warrantees with respect to the Intellectual Property or the licenses granted in this License Agreement. LICENSOR THUS PROVIDES ALL RIGHTS GRANTED LICENSEE UNDER THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT AS IS, AS AVAILABLE, WHERE IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS. Among other things, Licensor disclaims any and all warranties, whether express or implied, including by not limited to any implied warranty of merchantability, of fitness for a particular purpose, of title, of non-infringement or arising out of any course of dealing.

Negation. 16.1 The Owner does not warrant that the Equipment hired by the Customer is of merchantable quality or fitness for the purpose required by the Customer, either express or implied, other than as provided by the statute. 16.2 The Owner does not warrant that the Equipment is free from defect. 16.3 The Owner does not warrant anything which extends the description on the face of the hire agreement.

Negation. Sellers make no representation or warranty except as and to the extent set forth in this Agreement and any Appendices and Schedules attached hereto and any certificate or other document required to be delivered pursuant to Section 3.2. Except to the extent provided for in this Agreement and any Appendices and Schedules attached hereto or any certificate or other document required to be delivered pursuant to Section 3.2, Sellers shall not be liable (whether in contract, in tort or otherwise howsoever) for any covenant, representation, warranty, opinion, advice or statement which may have been made in any document or instrument relative hereto, or otherwise communicated to the Metso Canada Buyer or Metso Canada in any manner. The Metso Canada Buyer and Metso Canada confirm that they have only relied on the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement and any certificate or other document required to be delivered pursuant to Section 3.2 and any Appendices and Schedules attached hereto and not on any other covenants, representations or warranties. The Metso Canada Buyer and Metso Canada acknowledge and confirm that they have performed their own due diligence and, except for reliance on the representations and warranties contained in this Agreement and any Appendices and Schedules attached hereto and any certificate or other document required to be delivered pursuant to Section 3.2, have relied, and will continue to rely, upon their own analysis and investigations.

Negation. The emergence of various forms of negation (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et. al. 2007; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al., in press) through the mechanisms of communicative social interaction is considered to have been an extremely important qualifier in the emergence of symbolic representation capabilities. Very early in the language development of children negative speech acts emerge, such as the rejective and holophrastic “No!”, e.g. to refuse certain food or a particular activity. Other functions of negation in early child language include nonexistence, prohibition, denial, inability, failure, ignorance, expressing the violation of a norm, and inferential negation (▇▇▇▇, 1988). The mentioned examples show that the various functions of early negation are not necessarily related to each other and that the term encompasses a set of functions that is remarkably larger in scope than the well known negation of propositions in particular. Which function a particular case of negation has is obviously highly context-dependent in more than one sense. It depends on the linguistic context on one hand but also on the situational context. An artificial agent that is supposed to appropriate negative humanlike speech acts therefore cannot derive the meaning of these utterances through a simple lexical analysis. It has to take into account the situation in which the dialogue takes place (joint attentional frame). Current models either choose the representation of objects (▇▇▇, 2005b) or actions (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 2007) as basic representational building blocks. Different functions of negation tend to operate on the other hand more on objects (nonexistence) or more on actions (rejection, prohibition), which suggests that the support for certain forms of negation may be rather weak in each of these existing models. Thus, for achieving the emergence of the full range of early negation, ways have to be found to bypass these difficulties. (1) Which features must be supported by frameworks for grounded language learning and imitative learning to enable the representation and production of speech acts that involve negation? (2) To what degree and in which form must motivation in the robotic platform be modeled for this purpose, as the majority of early negative speech acts are acts of volition and not acts of description? (3) Can negation emerge as purely syntactical construction or is it necessary to modify the underlying grounding mechanism?

Negation. Negation in Mayan languages is generally formed with particles that are cognates beginning with ma. Nevertheless, micro-variation within this language family is shown regarding number of particles and their functions, and micro-variation can also be observed within Chuj. This was the most significant difference that I observed regarding the morphosyntax of Chuj. In this section I will discuss negation in the two varieties of Chuj, comparing my data to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ paper (1995) on SMI Chuj. I will begin with SSC Chuj, which generally has a simpler system than SMI Chuj.

Negation. (a) The Vendor and Seagull Corporation make no representation or warranty except as and to the extent set forth in Sections 3.1, 3.2, and 3.

Negation. This removes phrases governed by words that reverses the meaning of the answer. For example, if a candidate chunk “cancer” is extracted from a sentence “the patient has no history of cancer”, “cancer” would not be included.

Negation. Generally, sentential negation in Hindi-Urdu is always adjacent to a verb.