Common use of Microsoft Silverlight Clause in Contracts

Microsoft Silverlight. The requirements in this section ‎8 only apply if the Microsoft Silverlight product is used to provide the Content Protection System. Microsoft Silverlight is approved for streaming if using Silverlight 2 or later version. When used as part of a streaming service only (with no download), Playready licenses shall only be of the the SimpleNonPersistent license class. Within 6 months of the commercial launch of Silverlight 4, Licensee shall migrate to Silverlight 4 and be in full compliance with all content protection provisions herein or;. Within 6 months of the commercial launch of Silverlight 4, Licensee shall migrate to alternative, Licensor-approved DRM/streaming protection technology in full compliance with content protection requirements herein. Protection Against Hacking Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Licensor acknowledges that the approved Content Protection System for the Licensed Cable Service is a proprietary system which is owned and controlled by Scientific Atlanta for the Province of Ontario and Motorola for the Atlantic Provinces. Each vendor’s tamper-resistant technology within the hardware and software components is not within the public domain. Licensor deems the conditional access systems of Scientific Atlanta and Motorola to comply with the tamper resistant techniques outlined in subsection 9.4 below. The Content Protection System shall be designed, as far as is commercially and technically reasonable, to be resistant to “break once, break everywhere” attacks. The Content Protection System shall employ tamper-resistant software. Examples of tamper resistant software techniques include, without limitation: Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.

Microsoft Silverlight. The requirements in this section ‎8 9 only apply if the Microsoft Silverlight product is used to provide the Content Protection System. Microsoft Silverlight is approved for streaming if using Silverlight 2 or later version. When used as part of a streaming service only (with no download), Playready licenses shall only be of the the SimpleNonPersistent license class. Within 6 months of the commercial launch of Silverlight 4, Licensee shall migrate to Silverlight 4 and be in full compliance with all content protection provisions herein or;. Within 6 months of the commercial launch of Silverlight 4, Licensee shall migrate to alternative, Licensor-approved DRM/streaming protection technology in full compliance with content protection requirements herein. Protection Against Hacking Playback licenses, revocation certificates, and security-critical data shall be cryptographically protected against tampering, forging, and spoofing. The Content Protection System shall employ industry accepted tamper-resistant technology on hardware and software components (e.g., technology to prevent such hacks as a clock rollback, spoofing, use of common debugging tools, and intercepting unencrypted content in memory buffers). Licensor acknowledges that the approved Content Protection System for the Licensed Cable Service is a proprietary system which is owned and controlled by Scientific Atlanta for the Province of Ontario and Motorola for the Atlantic Provinces. Each vendor’s tamper-resistant technology within the hardware and software components is not within the public domain. Licensor deems the conditional access systems of Scientific Atlanta and Motorola to comply with the tamper resistant techniques outlined in subsection 9.4 below. [TJW: can we accept this system for early window content?] The Content Protection System shall be designed, as far as is commercially and technically reasonable, to be resistant to “break once, break everywhere” attacks. The Content Protection System shall employ tamper-resistant software. Examples of tamper resistant software techniques include, without limitation: Code and data obfuscation: The executable binary dynamically encrypts and decrypts itself in memory so that the algorithm is not unnecessarily exposed to disassembly or reverse engineering.