Questionnaire design Sample Clauses

Questionnaire design. CUSC-CCREU surveys run on a three-year cycle, targeting a different group of undergraduate Baccalaureate students each year. Starting in 2014, CUSC-CCREU redesigned the surveys with a core set of questions that are common to all three surveys and questions that are specific to each group of students. The final questionnaire for the 2016 First-Year Student Survey can be found in Appendix A.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (20)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Questionnaire design. Questionnaires are designed from a base of general questions followed by more specific questions. In this way the respondent should better understand the purpose and the aim of the research. The questions are mostly closed form to allow the respondent to give a clear definitive response. Moreover, as Bell states “the more structured a question, the easier it will be to analyse” (Xxxx, 2005, p137). Other advantages of closed questions are that they are easy to process, time-efficient and increase the validity of the information (since it reduces the variability in recording the answers) (Xxxxxx, 2004, p148). At the same time, the benefit of open-ended questions is taken into account in terms of capturing information not expected by the
Sample 1
Questionnaire design. The Contractor shall offer advice on questionnaire design.
Sample 1
Questionnaire design. To measure the clinicians‟ perception of the EMR alerting service, a user perception questionnaire was created. It will be an important way to measure whether and to what extent the EMR alerting service prototype meet stakeholders‟ objectives. The whole EMR alerting team, including team leader, technical leader, project manager, and system developer, were engaged to create and modify the content and expression of the questionnaire. In addition, suggestions and comments of persons who have experience in questionnaire design, as well as some clinicians who may have similar medical backgrounds as our intended users were received. The design started with detailed questions or statements, measuring clinicians‟ perception of each project objective. Nineteen questions were firstly created. The modification process helped to update the questionnaire to be more meaningful for evaluation objectives and more relevant to potential responders. Many questions or statements were deleted because it may not relate to clinicians, such as “Alerts have helped me identify public health events” and “The alert system disseminated public health information more efficiently than regular approaches”. Or, they were deleted because respondents may not be the best reviewer of the characteristic of the system and some more objective measures may be better, such as “How often was an alert relevant” and “Alerts have helped to improve health care quality”. Moreover, the respondents‟ perceptions about the statements or questions should be measurable or answerable. For example, “How many minutes did you spend on checking the alert” may be difficult to answer. In addition, many questions or statements were modified because they may not be appropriate. For example, “I find the public health alerts that EMR system provided were helpful,” is not appropriate because the EMR alerting system will be integrated with the clinical decision supporting system, and what a clinician will view will be an “alerts available” icon and several alerts instead of a new EMR alerting system. In this case, the statement that “I find the public health alerts that EMR system provided were helpful,” will be much better as it describes exactly the situation. The final version (table 3) consists of two parts: (1) nine fixed-choice questions; (2) one open response question. Nine questions will be used to measure clinicians' perception in six aspects: overall usability, integration with workflow, relevance, informativene...
Sample 1
Questionnaire design. CUSC-CCREU surveys run on a three-year cycle, targeting a different group of undergraduate Baccalaureate students each year. Starting in 2014, CUSC-CCREU redesigned the surveys with a core set of questions that is common to all three surveys and questions that are specific to each group of students. The questions for the new 2014 Survey of Middle-Years Students were tested by PRA in focus groups with university students in December 2013 to determine areas where students had difficulty answering questions or did not interpret the question correctly or consistently. This resulted in wording and scale changes to several questions. The final questionnaire for the 2014 Survey of Middle-Years Students can be found in Appendix A. A summary of question topics by survey year can be found in Appendix B.
Sample 1

Related to Questionnaire design

  • QUESTIONNAIRE (1) (a) Full Legal Name of Selling Securityholder:

  • Questionnaires All information contained in the questionnaires (the “Questionnaires”) completed by the Company and the Sponsor and, to the knowledge of the Company, the Company’s officers, directors and director nominees and provided to the Underwriters, is true and correct and the Company has not become aware of any information that would cause the information disclosed in the Questionnaires completed by the Company, the Sponsor or the Company’s officers, directors and director nominees to become inaccurate and incorrect.

  • D&O Questionnaires To the Company’s knowledge, all information contained in the questionnaires (the “Questionnaires”) completed by each of the Company’s directors and officers immediately prior to the Offering (the “Insiders”) as supplemented by all information concerning the Company’s directors, officers and principal shareholders as described in the Registration Statement, the Pricing Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, as well as in the Lock-Up Agreement (as defined in Section 2.24 below), provided to the Underwriters, is true and correct in all material respects and the Company has not become aware of any information which would cause the information disclosed in the Questionnaires to become materially inaccurate and incorrect.

  • Underwriters’ Questionnaire Your acceptance of the Invitation Wire for an Offering or your participation in an Offering as an Underwriter will confirm that you have no exceptions to the Underwriters’ Questionnaire attached as Exhibit A hereto (or to any other questions addressed to you in any Wires relating to the Offering previously sent to you), other than exceptions noted by you In Writing in connection with the Offering and received from you by us before the time specified in the Invitation Wire or any subsequent Wire.

  • REGISTRATION STATEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE In connection with the preparation of the Registration Statement, please provide us with the following information:

  • Investor Questionnaire The undersigned represents and warrants to the Company that all information that the undersigned has provided to the Company, including, without limitation, the information in the Investor Questionnaire attached hereto or previously provided to the Company (the “Investor Questionnaire”), is correct and complete as of the date hereof.

  • Conflict of Interest Questionnaire Requirement - Form CIQ - Continued If you responded "No, Vendor does not certify - VENDOR HAS CONFLICT" to the Conflict of Interest Questionnaire question above, you are required by law to fully execute and upload the form attachment entitled "Conflict of Interest Questionnaire - Form CIQ." If you accurately claimed no conflict above, you may disregard the form attachment entitled "Conflict of Interest Questionnaire - Form CIQ." Have you uploaded this form if applicable? Not Applicable

  • Conflict of Interest Questionnaire Requirement Vendor agrees that it has looked up, read, and understood the current version of Texas Local Government Code Chapter 176 which generally requires disclosures of conflicts of interests by Vendor hereunder if Vendor:

  • Conflict of Interest Questionnaire Chapter 176 of the Texas Local Government Code requires contractors contracting or seeking to contract with H-GAC to file a conflict of interest questionnaire (CIQ) if they have an employment or other business relationship with an H-GAC officer or an officer’s close family member. The required questionnaire and instructions are located on the H-GAC website or at the Texas Ethics Commission website xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/forms/CIQ.pdf. H-GAC officers include its Board of Directors and Executive Director, who are listed on this website. Respondent must complete and file a CIQ with the Texas Ethics Commission if an employment or business relationship with H-GAC office or an officer’s close family member as defined in the law exists.

  • Exhibit C Litigating Subdivisions List12

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.