Mechanical Integrity Sample Clauses
Mechanical Integrity. This test applies only to a REESS intended for installation in vehicles of categories M1 and N1. At the manufacturer’s choice, the test may be performed as, either:
(a) Vehicle based tests in accordance with paragraph 6.4.2.1. of this Regulation, or
(b) Component based tests in accordance with paragraph 6.4.2.2. of this Regulation.
Mechanical Integrity. The Commission may allow the use of a test to demonstrate mechanical integrity other than those listed in the Class VI UIC Program description. Any alternative mechanical integrity test must receive written approval from the EPA Administrator prior to implementation and be consistent with the requirements of 40 CFR §146.89(e).
Mechanical Integrity. To Seller’s Knowledge and except as set forth on Schedule 6.13, the ▇▇▇▇▇ set forth on Schedule 6.13 have maintained mechanical integrity and are capable of passing any mechanical integrity tests mandated by Law.
Mechanical Integrity. To the best of Seller’s knowledge the disposal and injection w▇▇▇▇ set forth on Schedule 5.19, have maintained mechanical integrity and are capable of passing any mechanical integrity tests mandated by state regulations upon transfer.
Mechanical Integrity. LDNR may allow the use of a test to demonstrate mechanical integrity other than those listed in the Class VI UIC Program description. Any alternative mechanical integrity test must receive written approval from the EPA Administrator prior to implementation and be consistent with the requirements of 40 CFR § 146.89(e).
Mechanical Integrity. (a) After the Closing until the date that is 12 months after the Closing Date, Purchaser may notify Seller in writing upon the discovery of any Mechanical Integrity Failure (each such notice, a “
Mechanical Integrity. Ammonia Piping Insulation Damage, Corrosion and Icing
Mechanical Integrity. Section 68.73(d)(2) of the RMP Regulations requires owners and operators of stationary sources to ensure that inspections and tests are performed on process equipment, including pressure vessels and piping systems, and that the inspections and tests follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. 40 C.F.R. § 68.73(a)(1)-(2), (d)(2). Further, Section 68.73(e) of the RMP Regulations requires owners and operators of stationary sources to correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits before further use, or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means are taken to assure safe operation. 40 C.F.R. § 68.73(e). The term “recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices” for purposes of the design and maintenance of the caprolactam manufacturing process at the Facility includes the following five industry standards: 1 The 2017 RMP listed 32,850 lbs of flammable mixture. Otherwise, the amounts of chemicals listed in the two risk management plans were identical. • MSS SP-58, Pipe Hangers and Supports-Materials, Design, Manufacture, Selection, Application and Installation (2006) (MSS SP-58); • American Petroleum Institute 570, Piping Inspection Code: In-service Inspection, Rating, Repair, and Alteration of Piping Systems, 3rd ed. (November 2009) (API 570); • American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 574, Inspection Practices for Piping System Components, 3rd ed. (November 2009) (API RP 574); • National Association of Corrosion Engineers SP0294, Standard Practice - Design, Fabrication, and Inspection of Storage Tank Systems for Concentrated Fresh and Process Sulfuric Acid and Oleum at Ambient Temperatures (2006) (▇▇▇▇ SP0294); and • National Association of Corrosion Engineers Publication 6G197/SSPC-TU 229, Design, Installation, and Maintenance of Coating Systems for Concrete Used in Secondary Containment- Information Report and Technology Update (February 1997) (▇▇▇▇ 6G197/SSPC-TU 229).
