Issue Resolution and Corrective Action Sample Clauses

Issue Resolution and Corrective Action summary of issue resolution. Issues are raised at the work-unit level and the stakeholders within the work unit will meet to attempt to resolve the concern. Issues unresolved at the work-unit level are reviewed by the local Partnership team. If the concern remains unresolved, the issue may be referred to the senior union and management regional strategy group, council or equivalent for resolution. Issue Resolution is an alternative to, but does not replace, the Grievance Procedure. summary of CorreCtive aCtion. Corrective Action is designed to be a non- punitive process. It is divided into two phases. The first phase, problem solving, follows a joint discovery process. Problem solving consists of levels one and two, which are neither adversarial nor disciplinary in nature. The goal of this phase is to determine the root cause of the problem by identifying all of the issues affecting performance and to collaboratively develop options to resolve them. The first phase is informal, with no documentation in the personnel file. The second phase, containing levels three through five, constitutes discipline. While there is no punishment, such as suspension without pay, the consequences of failure to resolve the issues may ultimately result in termination of employment. An employee who disputes any action at any level under this procedure shall have the right to file a grievance. An Issue Resolution/Corrective Action User’s Guide is available through the OLMP to provide a thorough orientation on successful utilization of the procedures for all covered employees. Upon ratification of this Agreement and the local agreements, a small group will meet to problem solve issues of concern relative to the design and overall effectiveness of the Issue Resolution and Corrective Action provisions. The group will include representatives from the national Issue Resolution Implementation Team, as well as representatives from operations and those with knowledge of these issues and concerns. If these issues have not been addressed to the satisfaction of all parties by January 1, 2006, the issues will be submitted to the Strategy Group for resolution. The Strategy Group can choose to address the issues as a full group, appoint a sub-group and/or submit the issue(s) to a panel under Section 1 of the Agreement.
Issue Resolution and Corrective Action. A copy of the Issue Resolution and Corrective Action Procedures can be obtained from your local union representative or Human Resources.
Issue Resolution and Corrective Action. Summary of Issue Resolution. Issues are raised at the work unit level and the stakeholders within the work unit will meet to attempt to resolve the concern. Issues unresolved at the work unit level are reviewed by the local Partnership team. If the concern remains unresolved, the issue may be referred to the senior union and management regional strategy group, coun- cil, or equivalent for resolution. Issue Resolution is an alternative to, but does not replace, the Grievance Procedure.
Issue Resolution and Corrective Action. An effective means of resolving issues is in the interests of all parties. Solving workplace concerns quickly and by those most directly involved is essential to reducing conflicts and grievances and creating a more constructive work environment. To that this procedure has two components: • A system for raising and quickly resolving workplace issues using interest-based problem solving by those directly involved with the issue. • A method of resolving performance and behavior issues in a non-punitive fashion in which employee, supervisor and Union representatives work together to identify the problem and craft the solution. Issues are raised at the work unit (team) level and the stakeholders within the work unit will meet in a timely manner to attempt to resolve the concern. If the concern continues to remain unresolved the parties will discuss and mutually agree on any next steps to follow. Issue resolution is an alternative to, but does not replace the Grievance Procedure. If the concern is generated from the employee to the Union ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or Representative, the Union shall notify the supervisor. If the concern is generated by the supervisor or by the employee to the supervisor, the supervisor shall notify the Union ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or Representative about the need for a meeting. DALF and DNG agree to attempt resolution through informal discussion so that the submission of a written grievance may not be necessary. The dialogue shall focus on resolving the issue to the satisfaction of all parties on an informal, amicable basis. Facts surrounding the issue(s) shall be presented, reviewed, and options discussed. Issues(s) must be addressed within a reasonable period of time. The Corrective Action Plan has five levels: Oral Reminder, Individual Action Plan, Corrective Action Plan, Day of Decision and Termination. The first two steps are informal with no documentation in the personnel file. There are no warning letters or suspensions. The goal is to jointly correct the performance or conduct, rather than punish the employee. An employee who disputes any action at any level under this procedure shall have the right to file a grievance. All discussion starts with Joint Objective Discovery. Level 1 – Oral Reminder Manager, employee and union representative (unless employee refuses representation) meet privately to o Identify the root cause o Develop solutions o Work together to solve problem o Write up a summary detailing each party’s commitment (placed in manager’s file ...

Related to Issue Resolution and Corrective Action

  • Implementation of Corrective Action Plan After the Corrective Action Plan is finalized, the Purchasers shall use reasonable best efforts to implement the finalized Corrective Action Plan on the timeline set forth therein and provide periodic reports (as provided for therein) to the Sellers on the status of their implementation of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Mitigation and Corrective Action Business Associate shall mitigate, to the extent practicable, any harmful effect that is known to it of an impermissible use or disclosure of PHI, even if the impermissible use or disclosure does not constitute a Breach. Business Associate shall draft and carry out a plan of corrective action to address any incident of impermissible use or disclosure of PHI. If requested by Covered Entity, Business Associate shall make its mitigation and corrective action plans available to Covered Entity. Business Associate shall require a Subcontractor to agree to these same terms and conditions.

  • Proposal of a Corrective Action Plan In addition to the processes set forth in the Term Contract (e.g., service level agreements), if the Customer or the Department determines that there is a performance deficiency that requires correction by the Contractor, then the Customer or the Department will notify the Contractor. The correction must be made within a timeframe specified by the Customer or the Department. The Contractor must provide the Customer or the Department with a corrective action plan describing how the Contractor will address all performance deficiencies identified by the Customer or the Department.

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.

  • Proposed Corrective Action Plan Simultaneously with the submission of the Audit, the District will submit to OCR for its review and approval a proposed Corrective Action Plan to address all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the District’s Audit. The proposed Corrective Action Plan will set out a detailed schedule for: (1) addressing problems, taking into account identified priorities, with all corrective actions to be completed within 18 months of the date OCR approved the Corrective Action Plan; (2) setting up systems of accountability and verifying claims of accessibility by vendors or open sources; and setting up a system of testing and accountability to maintain the accessibility of all online content and functionality on an ongoing basis. In its Corrective Action Plan, the District will acknowledge that if all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the Audit is not removed or made accessible on a timely basis, the District will be in violation of this Agreement, Section 504, and Title II and OCR may initiate administrative enforcement or judicial proceedings to enforce the specific terms and obligations of the Agreement.