Information Resources. A. It means the procedures, equipment, and software that are employed, designed, built, operated, and maintained to collect, record, process, store, retrieve, display, and transmit information, and associated personnel including consultants and contractors.
Information Resources. From the Closing Date until the date that is three months thereafter, Seller shall provide Buyer with access to Seller's mainframe computer only to the extent reasonably necessary to enable Buyer to use the PPMIS and MMS (in read only mode) systems and applications solely in connection with the Auctioned Assets. Buyer agrees that it will not use any such access for any purpose other than for the use of the PPMIS and MMS systems and applications solely in connection with the Auctioned Assets. Buyer acknowledges that, as long as it retains access to Seller's mainframe computer, Seller, its employees and third parties may have access to Buyer's information resources systems and applications (including the PPMIS and MMS systems and applications served by Seller's mainframe computer). Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 10.01, Buyer agrees that Seller shall have no liability or obligation whatsoever with respect to the matters contemplated by this Section 7.09, and Buyer agrees to hold each Seller Indemnitee harmless from and against all loss or damage or Indemnifiable Losses, and to indemnify each Seller Indemnitee from and against all loss or damage or Indemnifiable Losses incurred, asserted against or suffered as a result of Buyer's access to Seller's mainframe computer pursuant to this Section 7.09, in each case, except to the extent any such loss or damage or Indemnifiable Loss results in whole or in part from the gross negligence or wilful or wanton acts or omissions to act of any Seller Indemnitee (or any contractor or subcontractor of Seller).
Information Resources. 48 SECTION 7.10.
Information Resources. It applies equally to all individuals that use any Northwest LTC Information Resources.
Information Resources. 3.1 Each Party undertakes to publish logos with links of the official websites of the Parties for mutual promotion within 15 calendar days after signing this Memorandum.
Information Resources. The information sources used to develop this project summary include (1) the FPA for the MA DEP XL project; (2) a draft of a user’s guide for government agencies entitled, The Massachusetts Environmental Results Pro- gram (November 2001); (4) Learning from Inno- vations in Environmental Protection, Research Paper Number 1, Evaluation of the Massachusetts Environmental Results Program (June 2000) by Xxxxx Xxxxx and Xxx Xxxxxxx of Xxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx & April, Inc., prepared for the National Academy of Public Administration; (5) the Janu- ary 2000 Project XL Progress Report MA Depart- ment of Environmental Protection (EPA 100-R-00-013); and (6) The Project XL 2000 Com- prehensive Report, Volume 2: Directory of Project Experiments and Results, November 2000. 134 M xxxx & Company, Inc. FINAL PROJECT AGREEMENT SIGNED DECEMBER 15, 1997 Background The Project Sponsor: Merck & Company, Inc., is a worldwide, research-intensive, health products company that discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets human and animal health products. Merck’s Stonewall plant near Elkton, Virginia, was established in 1941. The plant employs more than 900 people in a range of pharmaceutical manufac- turing activities such as fermentation, solvent ex- traction, organic chemical synthesis, and finishing and packaging operations. The Stonewall plant is located 1.5 miles from the Shenandoah National Park, which has experienced substantial air qual- ity degradation and related resource impacts over the past several decades. The Experiment: Because of its proximity to Shenandoah National Park, Merck has volunteered to convert its coal-burning powerhouse to natural gas, a much cleaner-burning fuel, at the Merck Stonewall plant. The company’s conversion to natural gas has significantly reduced emission lev- els for sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), pollutants associated with visibility impair- ment and acid deposition, which have been ob- served in nearby Shenandoah National Park. In this XL project, the Virginia Department of Envi- ronmental Quality (VADEQ) has issued a site-spe- cific permit for Merck’s Stonewall plant. Merck’s air quality permit includes a site-wide cap on the facility’s total emissions of criteria air pollutants [volatile organic compounds (VOCs) as a surro- gate for ozone, particulate matter-10 (PM-10), car- bon monoxide, SO2, and NOx]. The permit also contains individual pollutant emission caps on SO2, NOx, and PM-10. As long as emissions remain below...
Information Resources. Tomskgeomonitoring Regional Center. URL: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx [in Russian]. Received: December 27, 2019 Xxxxxxxxxx X. CHURUKSAEVA (Candidate of Physics and Mathematics, Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation). E-mail: xxx.xx@xxxx.xx
Information Resources. The information in this summary comes from the following sources: (1) the FPA for the Ortho-XxXxxx Pharmaceutical Project, signed September 22, 2000; and (2) the 2000 Project XL Comprehensive Report, Volume 2: Directory of Project Experiments and Results, November 2000. 168
Information Resources. The information in this summary comes from the following sources: (1) the FPA for the Pennsylvania Department of Envi ronmental Protection XL project, signed Septem ber 22, 2000; and (2) the 2000 Project XL Comprehensive Report, Volume 2: Directory of Project Experiments and Results, November 2000. Project Status and Results PP G Industries, Inc. FINAL PROJECT AGREEMENT SIGNED SEPTEMBER 14, 2000 Background The Project Sponsor: PPG Industries, Inc., (PPG) is a leading global supplier of coating, continu ous-strand fiberglass, flat and fabricated glass, and chemicals. As a technological leader for 116 years, PPG has introduced many new products and pro cess innovations, especially in the area of new chemical development. These new chemical sub- stances are developed in PPG’s research and de velopment (R&D) facilities located in Monroeville, Xxxxxxx Park, and Harmarville, Pennsylvania, in the greater Pittsburgh area. 172 The Experiment: EPA’s Pollution Prevention (P2) Framework is a new screening methodology, based on a set of computerized risk screening tools, to assist in characterizing the fate and hazards likely to arise from the manufacture, use, and disposal of new chemicals. The P2 Framework, developed by EPA’s Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, was created to calculate or estimate important risk-related properties based on analy ses of chemical structures and to design safer chemicals, reduce waste generation, and identify other pollution prevention opportunities. In chemi cal manufacturing, companies invest substantial resources into new product development before seeking EPA approval, which is necessary under the Toxics Substances Control Act (TSCA) for new industrial chemicals. As a result, chemical prod uct developers would like to minimize costs and risks associated with worker exposure, reporting, testing, recalls, and product liability. Recogniz ing the potential environmental and economic ben efits, EPA is making the P2 Framework methodologies available to the chemical manufac turing industry to help promote the selection and application of safer chemicals and processes dur ing the early stages of decision making regarding chemical development. Applying the P2 Frame- work, PPG will incorporate environmental and health information into the early stages of its chemical development operations, as well as iden tify opportunities for pollution prevention. In ad dition, PPG believes that many other companies can dev...
Information Resources. The information in this summary comes from the following sources: (1) the Project XL FPA for the PPG Industries, Inc., Project, September 14, 2000; and (2) the 2000 Project XL Comprehensive Report, Volume 2: Di- rectory of Project Experiments and Results, No vember 2000. 175 Project Status and Results Progressive A uto Insurance Company FINAL PROJECT AGREEMENT SIGNED JULY 27, 2000 Background The Project Sponsor: Progressive Auto Insur ance is the fourth largest auto insurer in the United States, insuring more than 5 million people and operating more than 350 offices nationwide. In August 1998, Progressive began a limited market ing test in Houston, Texas, of a new product, AutographSM, which bases auto insurance premi ums in part on when, where, and how much a ve hicle is driven. In August of 1999, the company expanded the test throughout the State of Texas. Progressive has piloted this voluntary insurance policy using AutographSM to determine a consumer’s auto insurance rate. With the use of a global positioning system installed in the consumer’s vehicle, actual vehicle usage, includ ing when and how much the vehicle is driven, can easily be monitored.
