Individual level Sample Clauses
The 'Individual level' clause defines the scope of obligations, rights, or actions as they pertain to each individual party or participant under the agreement. In practice, this means that responsibilities, benefits, or requirements are assessed and enforced separately for each person, rather than collectively for a group. For example, compliance or eligibility might be determined on a per-person basis, ensuring that each individual's circumstances are considered independently. This clause ensures fairness and precision by preventing group-based assumptions and clarifying that each individual is treated according to their own situation.
Individual level. 2.2.a: Universal Individual Behavioral Factors
Individual level a series of three questions investigated how often the respondent was supportive, resistant, and angry/violent towards condom use. Response options were „often‟, „sometimes‟, and „never‟. A composite variable was created by identifying individuals who responded positively to all three questions (i.e. „never angry‟, „never resistant‟, and „often supportive‟) versus those that did not. Partner-level: a similar series of three questions investigated the respondent‟s perception of how often their partner‟s behavior had been supportive, resistant, and angry/violent towards condom use. Response options and creation of the partner-level composite variable were the same as for the individual-level variable. Couple-level: With the respondent‟s self-report of supportiveness and their partner‟s perception of their supportiveness, we were able to compare these responses to identify couples in which both partners were found to be supportive and their spouses perceived them as supportive versus couples in which non-supportiveness was reported by at least one partner (alpha=0.76). This couple-level variable served as the dependent variable for bivariate and multivariate analyses. Retrieved from the parent study‟s demographic data, measures included respondent‟s sex, current age (continuous), years of cohabitation (continuous), years since enrollment (continuous), country of residence (Zambia or Rwanda), and direction of infection (who is the HIV positive and negative partner in the relationship). When appropriate, variables that were not dichotomous were collapsed to contrast the response options that are protective towards HIV infection and not protective. Sexual behavior questions included perceived risk of HIV transmission to the negative partner, occurrence of condom breakage, condom skills, and desire for children. Each is described below. Perceived risk: One item assessed the chance that the negative partner would become HIV positive in the next 12 months based upon condom use in the last 12 months (or since study enrollment if it had been less than 12 months). Response options were „very high chance‟, „somewhat high chance‟, or „low chance‟. The categories „low chance‟ and „somewhat high/high chance‟ were used for the analysis. Condom breakage: One item was used to assess condom breakage in the last three months (yes/no). Condom skills assessment scale: Respondents demonstrated how to put a male condom onto a model penis and verbally reported how the condom would ...
Individual level. The greatest mobility of the employee is in the interest of both the employer and the employee. On the basis of this mutual interest, the employer is responsible for making sure the employee can actually participate in training by providing facilities for his development.
Individual level. 2.4.1 The concept of research. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (1993) stated that although research has become an important part of university life, there is no universal definition of this term. It is interesting to note that in his study the participants were dissatisfied with “their inability to define ‘research’ appropriately” because they were afraid to provide too general or too narrow definition due to its complexity (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 1993, p. 100). Nevertheless, he was able to identify three main constituents of research such as new knowledge generation, enquiry, and “the dissemination of research results” (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 1993, p. 108).
Individual level. Change Pattern(): the individual selected by the household change pattern by moving between its pattern and a new one with a probability determined by a FEASIBILITY MATRIX and the AVAILABILITY of the new pattern.
3.1. Example 1: change of activity pattern The individuals move between activity patterns with a probability determined by a feasibility matrix and the availability of the new pattern. Let's consider 3 different types of activities: Sector Activity Symbol Farm x owner Owner of a small farm FS Owner of a big farm FB Service General services with medium revenue SM The total number p of possible activity patterns is: p = 1 + 3 + (3x2)/2 = 7 In this case, the possible activity patterns for an individual are: P0 = (0 0 0) : unemployed P1 = (1 0 0) : worker as a owner of a small farm P2 = (0 1 0) : worker as a owner of a big farm