IDI. SDI and the IDI Lenders now desire to compromise, settle and fully resolve any and all obligations, contingent or otherwise, of IDI and SDI to the IDI Lenders under the 2002 IDI Settlement Agreement, including, without limitation, obligations under Section 5 thereof.
IDI agrees to continue to employ you in a full-time capacity, at your current compensation rate and with the same benefits, until such time as you and the Board of Directors agree otherwise. Your employment will be at-will. This means that either you or IDI may terminate your employment at any time, for any reason or no reason.
IDI. It) tI.-f)it: lilt IfJ!fs Mliftg '" AJIIC,,,,ing ~' -,. if Jl=~((L (bl ClimfJrrS '"t111nDf '" .tJ", ()II ."" .h", 1M, tlr, nDI "f1i.1i'rt'd, ",(fI "S fJI'Ilf1t1t1l1'S" "",,'&1•••
IDI. Industrial Developments International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, an indirect owner of Seller.
IDI. Store (D (1) , sk, pk) Store (D (2) , pk) User Ui / DAi : Secure channel : Secure channel : Insecure channel Fig. 2: System model User Ui / DBi
IDI mod q as the other key share, where tion, we can have the following: rIDi · −r IDi ≡ 1 mod q. r D(2)
IDI. D(1) = rID ( 1 )P can violate the user to server into the list L . Finally, C returns (ID , v , P , D ) to t s+h1(IDt) authentication with a non-negligible probability ε1. Then, we A. Ω C A
IDI as principal underwriter, hereby appoints Broker-Dealer to distribute the Contracts.
IDI. Her iki skorlama sistemi için iki okuyucu arasındaki uyum “iyi” düzeydeydi. Kappa değerleri PI-RADSv2 için 0,600, PI-RADSv2.1 için 0,624 idi. Doksan-sekiz (%48,5) olguda KAK görüldü. PI-RADSv2 ve v2.1 skorlama sistemi için EAA değerleri okuyucu 1 için sırasıyla 0,861 ve 0,851, okuyucu 2 için sırasıyla 0,873 ve 0,883 idi. Sonuç: Okuyucular arası uyum mpMRG’de “iyi” olup PI-RADSv2.1 ile hafif artmıştır. Her iki sistemin tanısal performansı neredeyse eşittir. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx: Xxxxxxx, görüntüleme eşliğinde biyopsi, multiparametrik MRG, prostat kanseri Corresponding (İletişim): Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Department of Radiology, Health Science University Dr. Behçet Uz Child Disease and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey E-mail (E-posta): xx.xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx Received (Geliş Tarihi): 07.12.2020 Accepted (Kabul Tarihi): 25.12.2020 INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer of men in Turkey.[1] The incidence is higher in developed countries, reflecting a greater use of screening and diagnostic tools. [2] Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is popular in diagnosing and local staging.[3] The publication of the prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) guideline introduced a standardization in acquisition and reporting.[4] The guideline was revised in 2019 and the current version 2.1 (v2.1) has been published.[5] ThemainproblemintheevaluationofmpMRIwasinconsistency among readers.[6-9] The reason is subjective signal definitions as "mild, moderate, marked" in PI-RADSv2.[6] These qualitative definitions facilitate use of mpMRI while it causes differences among readers in interpretation.[7,9] The current PI-RADSv2.1 presents minor revisions.[5] For example, the addition of “a more pronounced signal change than any other focus in the same zone” provides a more detailed definition of category 4 in peripheral zone (PZ).[3] These updates in signal description propose to increase the compatibility between readers.[5] The purpose of this study is to compare PI-RADSv2 with v2.1 in terms of interreader agreement. Additionally, the PI-RADS scores were also compared with each other in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSCa).
IDI. Industrial Developments International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, the parent company of ID International (Texas), Inc., a Georgia corporation, Seller’s managing general partner.
