Common use of HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Clause in Contracts

HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES. Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 6307(1) .....6307(2) ..... 41:508. 41:501(note). Feb. 3, 1978, Pub. L. 95–224, § 9, 92 Stat. 6.Feb. 3, 1978, Pub. L. 95–224,§ 10(d), 92 Stat. 6; Apr. 1,1982, Pub. L. 97–162, 96 Stat. 23. In clause (2), the word ‘‘exempt’’ is substituted for ‘‘except’’ for consistency.

Appears in 7 contracts

Samples: www.govinfo.gov, www.govinfo.gov, www.govinfo.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES. Revised Section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) 6307(1) .....6307(2) ..... 41:5088702 ............ 41:53. 41:501(note)Mar. 8, 1946, ch. Feb. 80, § 3, 1978, 60Stat. 37; Pub. L. 95–22486–695, § 9Sept. 2, 92 1960, 74 Stat. 6.Feb. 3, 1978, 740; Pub. L. 95–224,§ 10(d99–634, § 2(a), 92 Nov. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 6; Apr. 1,1982, Pub. L. 97–162, 96 Stat. 233524. In clause paragraph (23), before subparagraph (A), the word words ‘‘exemptdirectly or indirectly’’ is substituted for ‘‘except’’ for consistencyare omitted as unnecessary.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: www.govinfo.gov, www.govinfo.gov, www.govinfo.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.