Guidelines for assessment Sample Clauses

Guidelines for assessment. (a) Candidates for tenure and promotion will be assessed using the Standards for Tenure and Promotion for Faculty under the NU/NUFA Collective Agreement as approved by the University and the Association through the JCAA. The Standards and this Article (25.14) serve as guides to evaluators of what is to be expected of candidates for tenure and promotion; they are not a rigid set of rules to be applied mechanically. (b) The diversity of academic and professional disciplines at Nipissing University make inequitable if not impractical any single evaluation scheme for promotions. Evaluators must be flexible in their assessment and weighting of the candidate’s accomplishments, especially for promotions to the rank of Associate Professor. This includes acknowledging diverse career paths, ways of knowing, and forms of communicating knowledge. Greater conformity to a norm is expected for promotions to Professor. (c) In order to meet expectations in the category of research, scholarly and/or creative activities, candidates for tenure must have developed a research program that goes beyond the requirements for the terminal degree.
Guidelines for assessment. 3.1 When preparing the final terms of reference under section 46(1)(b) of the Environmental Protection ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, the Chief Executive must ensure that the final terms of reference meets the criteria mentioned in Schedule 1, Item 4.03 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000.
Guidelines for assessment. 3.1 In preparing the terms of reference for an EIS, the Coordinator-General must ensure that the EIS will meet the requirement of sub-section 35(1) of the State Development and Public Works Organisation Regulation 2010 and that the terms of reference are designed to ensure that the EIS: (a) assesses all relevant impacts that the action has, will have or is likely to have; (b) provides enough information about the action and its relevant impacts to allow the Commonwealth Environment Minister to make an informed decision whether or not to approve the action under Part 9 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇; and (c) addresses the matters mentioned in Division 5.2 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 for an EIS. 3.2 Where the assessment is by IAR and the Commonwealth Environment Minister has made a request under clause 17.4 of this Agreement in connection with that assessment, the Coordinator-General must issue to the proponent written guidelines for the preparation of an IAR that are designed to ensure that the IAR addresses the matters mentioned in schedule 1 to the State Development and Public Works Organisation Regulation 2010 (as if a reference in that schedule to an EIS were a reference to an IAR) and: (a) assesses all relevant impacts that the action has, will have or is likely to have; (b) provides enough information about the action and its relevant impacts to allow the Commonwealth Environment Minister to make an informed decision whether or not to approve the action under Part 9 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇; and (c) addresses the matters mentioned in Division 5.2 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 for an EIS.
Guidelines for assessment. 3.1 A proponent for an action covered by the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 under Part 6, section 32 must apply to the Chief Executive for terms of reference for an environmental impact statement for a development. In accordance with sections 691 or 692 of the Sustainable ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, the Chief Executive must prepare terms of reference that allow the purposes of the EIS to be achieved for the development. In accordance with the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, the terms of reference are designed to ensure that the assessment: (a) assesses all the relevant impacts of the action; (b) provides enough information about the action and its relevant impacts to allow the Commonwealth Environment Minister to make an informed decision whether to approve the action; and (c) addresses the matters mentioned in Division 5.2 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 for an environmental impact statement. 3.2 The proponent must have: (a) been provided with submissions made by the public during the period that the draft EIS is released for public comments; and (b) prepared a written response for inclusion in the EIS, which summarises or takes into account the issues raised by the public in submissions.
Guidelines for assessment. 3.1 A proponent for an action covered by the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 under Part 6, section 32 must apply to the Chief Executive for terms of reference for an environmental impact statement for a development. In accordance with sections 691 or 692 of the Sustainable ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, the Chief Executive must prepare terms of reference that allow the purposes of the EIS to be achieved for the development. In accordance with the Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009, the terms of reference are designed to ensure that the assessment: (a) assesses all the relevant impacts of the action; (b) provides enough information about the action and its relevant impacts to allow the Commonwealth Environment Minister to make an informed decision whether to approve the action; and (c) addresses the matters mentioned in Division 5.2 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 for an environmental impact statement.
Guidelines for assessment. The Commission must prepare written guidelines for the preparation of an environmental impact statement that are designed to ensure that the environmental impact statement: assesses all relevant impacts of the proposed action; contains enough information about the proposed action and its relevant impacts to allow the Commonwealth Minister to make an informed decision whether or not to approve the action; and addresses the matters (if any) prescribed for the purposes of section 102(2)(b) of the EPBC Act relating to the preparation of guidelines for a draft environmental impact statement under that Act. The Commission will, if it considers it appropriate to do so, having regard to the objects and purposes of the EPBC Act and any comments from the Commonwealth Minister, publish draft guidelines for the preparation of the environmental impact statement and seek public comment on the draft guidelines.
Guidelines for assessment. The assessment guidelines prepared by the Panel for the preparation of a project impact statement must be designed to ensure that the project impact statement: assesses all relevant impacts of the proposed action; contains enough Information about the project and its relevant impacts to enable the Commonwealth Minister to make an informed decision whether or not to approve the proposed action; and addresses the matters (if any) prescribed for the purposes of paragraph 102(2)(b) of the EPBC Act relating to the preparation of guidelines for a draft environmental impact statement under that Act. In the preparation of the guidelines the Panel will publish draft guidelines and seek public comments if the Panel considers it appropriate to do so, having regard to the objects and purposes of the EPBC Act and any comments from the Commonwealth Minister. A project impact statement must be prepared by the proponent in accordance with the guidelines mentioned in Item 5.2 of this Schedule 1, and must be released for public exhibition and comment for a period of at least 28 days. When the public is invited to comment on the draft project impact statement documentation or draft guidelines referred to in Items 5.2 or 5.3, the invitation must be published in a daily newspaper that circulates throughout Australia and a daily newspaper that circulates in Tasmania. The advertisements must include:
Guidelines for assessment. The Board must prepare guidelines for the preparation of the development proposal and environmental management plan. The guidelines must ensure that the development proposal and environmental management plan: assesses all relevant impacts of the proposed action; contains enough Information about the proposed action and its relevant impacts to allow the Commonwealth Minister to make an informed decision whether or not to approve the action; and addresses the matters (if any) prescribed for the purposes of section 102(2)(b) of the EPBC Act relating to the preparation of guidelines for a draft environmental impact statement under that Act. The Board will, if it considers it appropriate to do so, having regard to the objects and purposes of the EPBC Act and any comments from the Commonwealth Minister, publish draft guidelines for the preparation of the development proposal and environmental management plan and seek public comment on the draft guidelines. A development proposal and environmental management plan must be prepared in accordance with the guidelines mentioned in Item 4.3 of this Schedule 1, and released for public comment for a period of at least 28 days. Prior to or at the commencement of the public comment period, notice must be given by public advertisement of the availability of copies of the development proposal and environmental management plan and the opportunity for the public to provide comments. When the public is invited to comment on the development proposal and environmental management plan or guidelines mentioned in Item 4.3 and 4.4 of this Schedule 1, the invitation must be published in a daily newspaper that circulates throughout Australia and a daily newspaper that circulates in Tasmania. The advertisements must include: