General Protocols Clause Samples

General Protocols. C.5.1.1. Review Teams must embody a range of expertise and must include at least one academic and one industrial representative. According to the Accord Rules and Procedures, the Committee must select at least three members for the Review Team. In selecting the Review Team the Committee will give consideration to the following: • The review team normally comprises two academic persons and one industry person each from different jurisdictions. • The review team leader, who is selected by the Committee, should desirably have been a member of a previous international review or evaluation team. • The team should desirably cover a range of disciplines. Essential Criteria: • Experienced in the relevant national accreditation or competence assessment in their own jurisdiction • Possesses good communication skills including being able to communicate in English • Understands protocols for working in different cultures • Able to work collaboratively in a self-managed international peer group, noting that the team produces its report without secretarial assistance • Has time available (including 7-14 days for a review visit or a number of shorter reviews over a 3 year period) without remuneration • Familiar with the IEA review requirements and exemplars • Prepared to contribute feedback to improve the review process Desirable Criteria • Been a Visit Chair of accreditations and/or served on the Accreditation Board or equivalent decision making body in their own jurisdiction • Has previous experience as a review team member of the relevant IEA Accord • Able to communicate in the language of the jurisdiction being reviewed • Available to act as a team member for at least three years
View SourceView Similar (4)
General Protocols. C. 5.2.1 Review Teams must embody a range of expertise in undertaking competence assessment and quality assuring the results of competence assessment processes. According to the Accord Rules and Procedures, the Committee must select at least three members for the Review Team. (see Guidelines Annex 2)
View SourceView Similar (3)
General Protocols. Review Teams must embody a range of expertise and must include at least one academic and one industrial representative. According to the Accord Rules and Procedures, the Committee must select at least three members for the Review Team.
View Source
General Protocols. Upon receipt of a call, the CSR opens the conversation with a friendly introduction. CSRs are trained to fully listen to the customer’s request, ask clarifying questions, and then repeat the details back to the customer. Once the CSR has verified that they understand the nature of the call, they propose a solution. Once the issue has been resolved to the customer’s satisfaction, the CSR then inputs all appropriate details into the customer service software system. The backbone of CONTRACTOR’s solution for maintaining collection performance, route management, and customer service systems is one developed specifically for the waste industry and heavily used throughout CONTRACTOR affiliate companies and comes with strong support. Ensuring customers are satisfied with services nearly eliminates customer concerns and unnecessary phone calls. In order to increase overall program effectiveness, customer satisfaction and interaction is key. The software application we use integrates all aspects of collection, routing and billing operations to seamlessly and efficiently provide excellent customer service. This enables CONTRACTOR to collect data that allows us to itemize specific issues for the operations team so they can monitor issues and ensure that any operational issues are handled and remedied quickly. A few examples of the issues and resolutions that we experience and specifically track include the three most common, described below: Accessibility to the CSR database for off‐site users is managed through terminal services. Network access is granted and users of the system are assigned access rights, which are limited based on department and position. Appropriate staff will be assigned a user ID with access rights to view real‐time work orders, current account data, service levels, notes, numbers and types of complaints and/or compliments, and collection days.
View Source
General Protocols. The sediment along the northern bank of Fishkill Creek will be probed in order to visually inspect for the presence of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) or other contaminants. The area adjacent to the historic mineral oil tanks located between buildings B-4 and B-2 will be of special focus during this inspection.
View Source
General Protocols. Test pits will be excavated in the far western portion of the Site, (Figure 7, Appendix A). The purpose of the test pits is to observe the extent of debris and fill material in this area of the Site. During the extension of test pits, observations will be recorded on the material encountered, PID readings, total depth of test pit and any other significant information.
View Source
General Protocols. C.5.2.1. Review Teams must embody a range of expertise in undertaking competence assessment and quality assuring the results of competence assessment processes. According to the Accord Rules and Procedures, the Committee must select at least three members for the Review Team. (see Guidelines Annex 2) C.5.2.2. In selecting the Review Team, the Executive Committee as well as the Secretariat must be cognisant of any activities that may impede individuals from participating due to conflict of interest. C.5.2.3. In establishing the extent of review activities to be carried out on the ground in the jurisdiction the Review Team is expected to take into account: • Whether the jurisdiction is a signatory of the relevant Accord, and • The extent to which the Authorized Member has previously been visited by a review team, and • The quality and sufficiency of information supplied by the Authorized Member under review to confirm that the relevant standards, systems, and processes conform to the requirements and exemplars, and • Whether there have been substantial changes to education criteria or competence assessment standards, processes or systems of the Authorized Member since it was last reviewed. C.5.2.4. Protocols to be observed for non-English speaking organisations where the Review Team members are not fluent in the language of the jurisdiction being reviewed: • English translations shall be provided of the key parts of the pre-visit documents for each visit that is to be observed and must include sufficient information for the observers to become familiar with the observed institutions, programs, and visiting teams. • A single translator shall be provided. The organisation being reviewed should be responsible for that selection, but should select individuals who, in addition to having good language skills and a knowledge of the processes and systems, agree to hold a neutral position with regard to the observation process C.5.2.5. The Final Report may follow the example set out in Guideline Annex 3 and shall include: • An executive summary outlining major system characteristics and citing recommended action with the appropriate action statement. • An overall introduction to the system under review and its standards • Information on policies / procedures and criteria for the system under review, including a comprehensive analysis of how the system addresses marginal, difficult conditional actions • A brief description of the types of assessment observed. • Inform...
View Source
General Protocols. All encountered soils will be properly characterized in the field and findings will be recorded in logbooks. Material selected for sampling will be obtained in a manner consistent with NYSDEC sample collection protocols. Decontaminated stainless steel trowels and dedicated gloves will be used at each sample location to place the material into laboratory-supplied glassware. Prior to and after the collection of each material sample, the sample collection instrument will be properly decontaminated to avoid cross-contamination between samples. Soils selected for sampling purposes will be composite or grab samples from discreet four-foot core intervals, grab samples from soils exposed in test pits, or grab samples from surface locations. Soil sampling will be biased towards surface soils (0 to 2 inches below ground surface after removal of the vegetative cover), soils at the groundwater interface, and any soils with elevated PID readings, unusual odors, discoloration, or, any other field evidence of contamination.
View Source
General Protocols. C.5.1.1 Review Teams must embody a range of expertise and must include at least one academic and one industrial representative. According to the Accord Rules and Procedures, the Committee must select at least three members for the Review Team. C.5.1.2 In selecting the Review Team, the Committee as well as the secretariat must be cognisant of any activities that may impede individuals from participating due to conflict of interest. C.5.1.3 The chair of the Review Team must be appointed by the Committee at the time of notification of the team composition. C.5.1.4 The management of reviews shall conform with any policy approved by the International Engineering Alliance in regard to risks to the safety and security of Review Team members. C.5.1.5 After appointment of a Review Team, the signatories from which the Review Team are drawn shall each have the responsibility to prepare the Review Team member from their jurisdiction for the task by familiarisation with the Rules and relevant guidelines, and sharing of any relevant previous knowledge or experience of good accreditation/ recognition practice. C.5.1.6 The Committee shall brief the Review Team leader on what is expected of the Review Team, and the manner in which the Review Team must report. C.5.1.7 The following protocols are to be observed for non English speaking organisations where the Review Team members are not fluent in the language of the jurisdiction being reviewed: a. English translations shall be provided of the key parts of the pre-visit documents for each visit that is to be observed and must include sufficient information for the observers to become familiar with the observed institutions, programs, and visiting teams.
View Source

Related to General Protocols

  • Cooperation on forestry matters and environmental protection 1. The aims of cooperation on forestry matters and environmental protection will be, but not limited to, as follows: (a) establishing bilateral cooperation relations in the forestry sector; (b) developing a training program and studies for sustainable management of forests; (c) improving the rehabilitation and sustainable management of forest with the aim of increasing carbon sinks and reduce the impact of climate change in the Asia-Pacific region; (d) cooperating on the execution of national projects, aimed at: improving the management of forest plantations for its transformation for industrial purposes and environmental protection; (e) elaborating studies on sustainable use of timber; (f) developing new technologies for the transformation and processing of timber and non-timber species; and (g) improving cooperation in agro-forestry technologies. 2. To achieve the objectives of the Article 149 (Objectives), the Parties may focus, as a means of cooperation and negotiations on concluding a bilateral agreement on forestry cooperation between the two Parties. Such collaboration will be as follows: (a) exchanges on science and technology as well as policies and laws relating the sustainable use of forest resources; (b) cooperation in training programs, internships, exchange of experts and projects advisory; (c) advice and technical assistance to public institutions and organizations of the Parties on sustainable use of forest resources and environmental protection; (d) facilitating forest policy dialogue and technical cooperation under the Network of Sustainable Forest Management and Forest Rehabilitation in Asia- Pacific Region, initiated at the 15th Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Meeting; (e) encouraging joint studies, working visits, exchange of experiences, among others; and (f) others activities mutually agreed.

  • Health and Safety Standards Contractor shall abide by all health and safety standards set forth by the State of California and/or the County of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ pursuant to the Injury and Illness Prevention Program. If applicable, Contractor must receive all health and safety information and training from County.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • Office of Supplier Diversity The State of Florida supports its diverse business community by creating opportunities for woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises to participate in procurements and contracts. The Department encourages supplier diversity through certification of woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises and provides advocacy, outreach, and networking through regional business events. For additional information, please contact the Office of Supplier Diversity (OSD) at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.

  • Information Technology Accessibility Standards Any information technology related products or services purchased, used or maintained through this Grant must be compatible with the principles and goals contained in the Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards adopted by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794d), as amended. The federal Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards can be found at: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/508.htm.