Future Possibilities Sample Clauses
The "Future Possibilities" clause outlines how the parties will address potential changes, developments, or unforeseen circumstances that may arise after the agreement is executed. Typically, this clause sets forth procedures for discussing, negotiating, or amending the contract to accommodate new opportunities, technologies, or regulatory changes that could impact the agreement. Its core function is to provide flexibility and a framework for adapting the contract to evolving situations, thereby reducing the risk of disputes and ensuring the agreement remains relevant over time.
Future Possibilities. Partner and SFDC will maintain an ongoing, open and collaborative communications channel during the implementation of, and throughout the duration of, the partnership. Based upon the mutual success of the partnership, SFDC and Partner will explore extending the partnership in various ways. The parties plan to discuss partnership progress and extension possibilities approximately every four (4) months.
Future Possibilities. Mobile-Ad-hoc-Networks is a very active research field: several projects in the domain are done at this moment in the EU, in USA and in Japan/Asia. However, most of these projects deal with theoretical aspects of MobileMAN and will lead at best to computer simulations and models. MobileMAN deal instead with both the theoretical and practical aspects of MobileMAN; this will enable some unique future possibilities: • In the scientific-technique domain, the project result will give access to a new effective technology for MobileMAN. This will open the way to the study and realisation of a whole new class of algorithms and technologies: Internetworking for MobileMAN, Quality-of-Service for MobileMAN, Ergonomics for MobileMAN, Applications for MobileMAN, etc ... • In the economic domain, the high potential of the MobileMAN, due to the novelty of the approach, will give a strong stimulus to the creation of new companies (or to the expansion of existing companies), as explained above. Not only new hardware should be provided, but also low-level software, middleware and above all a whole new class of applications and services. Service providers will for instance have the opportunity to create new business channels reviving their stagnating Internet operations. • In the social domain, MobileMAN relies on high interplay between technology and social life. This goes in the direction of reducing traditional barriers between technology and customers, making possible the creation of a new class of network users that is also “part of the network”.
Future Possibilities. Since the Davidson decision, the issue is no longer whether prohibition on reverse engineering can be a term of a contract in a ▇▇▇▇, as it clearly can be, but rather how far courts will go to uphold the rights of publishers in a ▇▇▇▇ and where, if ever, they will find the agreement to be unconscionable. Consumers often do not understand how limiting EULAs are on their rights. Undoubtedly, online agreements are valid contractual agreements and parties are free to contract out of legal rights, but at what point will the courts see that consumers have no other option but to agree to the contract? In today’s marketplace, if consumers wish to use software, there is no real meaningful choice; they must assent to the terms of the ▇▇▇▇, and in their current state, these agreements are severely limiting consumers’ rights. It should be noted that the Davidson Court may have lacked a true understanding of the gaming community. The Court disproved of the fact that bnetd was not created for commercial purposes since the defendants did not attempt to profit financially from their creation.36 The defendant’s goal is common in the gaming world; they created a product to improve the gaming experience. They were simply frustrated with the poor service provided on the Blizzard server. It was not mentioned in the case, but the decision seems to infer that since there was no commercial purpose, the defendants were engaged in a malicious act directed towards Blizzard in an attempt to cut into their market share. That seems to be the only logical explanation as to why the Court would even point out the fact that the server was not created for commercial purposes. This appears to be one example of how out of touch the Court was with the video game world and the purpose of creating modifications. Viewed from another standpoint, this leaves open the possibility that future cases may be decided differently, providing more protection to the end user, as the legal 36 Supra note 3 at 18. community increases their understanding of modifications and the gaming community as a whole. The Davidson ruling also seems to leave open some possibility that future cases may hold certain terms of a ▇▇▇▇ to be unconscionable, particularly where the user is an “unwitting member of the general public”.37 In most situations, the ▇▇▇▇ will not affect average consumers or influence their purchasing decisions, nor will it have any lasting effect on their lives. This presents the current problem that publ...
Future Possibilities. 2.8.1 Investigate options for NRAHD growth.
Future Possibilities. We have made a Gateway with at most ten possible connections between the Advant Control Builder and Matlab/Simulink. The desirable way to expand the Gateway should be to have the possibility to choose as many connections as desired. There are a lot of questions around such Gateway but we think that it is possible. The user interface where for example the connections should be chosen is one problem to solve. The Connections dialog, which shows the number of used connections, must be designed to expand depending on how many connections the user desires. Another interesting question is how many connections that are realistic. Future development of our Gateway could be the possibility to save all settings made during the configuration of the Gateway to a file. It should then be possible to make the same connection from the saved settings. This file should perhaps have a unique extension for the system to know that it is a correct file. This could also be connected to a question in a dialog window that asks if the user wants to save the used settings before the Gateway is shut down. To get more use of the Gateway a lot of processes, to be simulated, have to be built in Simulink. This can either be done by connecting different smaller blocks in Simulink or by writing S-functions. For identification of processes Mathworks provides a toolbox to Matlab. This toolbox is called System Identification Toolbox. It provides tools to generate a mathematical model of a dynamical system. The identification is based on observed input/output data. There are some more desirable extensions to be made to the Gateway program. To show in the main window all the settings that were made during the configuration and what the program has performed is one of them. It should also be possible to print out what is shown in the main window. Another extension should be to add a browser in the Choose ACB-Project dialog window. This will make it easier to find the function block instances in the Application in the Advant Control Builder. The problem that the communication between the Gateway and Matlab is locked when Matlab is suspended must be solved. Either by making it possible for the Gateway to access Matlab even if Simulink is suspended, or by synchronizing the Gateway so that it is only accessing Matlab when the thread is not suspended. It is always desirable to get the communication to work faster. The way from the Advant Control Builder to Matlab/Simulink includes a lot of different ...