Common use of Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions Clause in Contracts

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX Holdings, nor any NYMEX Holdings Subsidiary, nor any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (a) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Law, (b) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts or (c) violated or operated in noncompliance with any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX Holdings.

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX Holdingsthe Company, nor any NYMEX Holdings Subsidiaryof its Subsidiaries, nor any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (ai) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 1977 or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Lawlaw, (bii) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts or (ciii) violated violated, or operated not in noncompliance with compliance with, any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in laws and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX Holdingsregulations.

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX Holdings, the Company nor any NYMEX Holdings Subsidiaryof its Subsidiaries, nor any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (a) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Law, (b) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts or (c) violated or operated in noncompliance with any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX Holdingsthe Company.

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX HoldingsSince October 31, 2008, neither the Company nor any NYMEX Holdings Company Subsidiary, nor any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (a) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Law, (b) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts or (c) violated or operated in noncompliance with any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in and would notnot reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX HoldingsEffect.

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX Holdingsthe Company, nor any NYMEX Holdings Company Subsidiary, nor any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (ai) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Law, (bii) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts or (ciii) violated or operated in noncompliance with any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in and would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX HoldingsEffect.

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX HoldingsNone of the Sold Entities nor, nor any NYMEX Holdings Subsidiaryto the Knowledge of the Sellers and the Blocker Sellers, nor any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (a) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, 1977 or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Law, (b) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts or (c) violated or operated in noncompliance with any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in and would notnot reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX HoldingsEffect.

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX Holdings, nor any NYMEX Holdings SubsidiaryNone of the Company Group, nor any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf of a member of the Company Group has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (ai) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Law, (bii) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts gifts, or (ciii) violated or operated in noncompliance with any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in and would notas, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not reasonably be expected to result in have a Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX Holdingsthe Company Group.

Foreign Corrupt Practices and International Trade Sanctions. Neither NYMEX Holdings, the Company nor any NYMEX Holdings Company Subsidiary, nor to the knowledge of the Company, any of their respective directors, officers, agents, employees or any other Persons acting on their behalf has, in connection with the operation of their respective businesses, (a) used any corporate or other funds for unlawful contributions, payments, gifts or entertainment, or made any unlawful expenditures relating to political activity to government officials, candidates or members of political parties or organizations, or established or maintained any unlawful or unrecorded funds in violation of Section 104 of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or any other similar applicable foreign, federal or state Law, (b) paid, accepted or received any unlawful contributions, payments, expenditures or gifts or (c) violated or operated in noncompliance with any export restrictions, anti-boycott regulations, embargo regulations or other applicable domestic or foreign Laws, in each case, except as has not resulted in and would notnot reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect on NYMEX HoldingsEffect.