Common use of for Promotion Clause in Contracts

for Promotion. All recommendations concerning faculty promotions are forwarded by the University Rank and Tenure Committee to the Chancellor of the University, who in turn makes a final decision. The Chancellor may elect not to grant promotion to candidates recommended at earlier levels. However, if the Chancellor fails to promote a candidate who has received positive recommendations from at least three of the previous levels and two of the previous levels for unit members from the College of Education, the Chancellor shall advise the candidate in writing of the decision. The candidate is then entitled to a hearing with the Chancellor. The Chancellor may not promote any candidate who has not received positive recommendations at three review levels or two in the case of unit members from the College of Education. In the event a candidate receives three or more positive reviews or two in the case of a unit member from the College of Education, and the Chancellor does not grant promotion, the Chancellor shall provide specific written reasons to the candidate for that decision. It is understood that written reasons must include concerns in relation to the specific criteria for promotion provided for within the Agreement. It is further understood that where promotion and tenure are concerned the Department/College committees, Deans/Director and the University Rank and Tenure Committee shall submit written reasons for their respective decisions whether positive or negative.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement

for Promotion. All recommendations concerning faculty promotions are forwarded by the University Rank and Tenure Committee to the Chancellor of the University, who in turn makes a final decision. The Chancellor may elect not to grant promotion to candidates recommended at earlier levels. However, if the Chancellor fails to promote a candidate who has received positive recommendations from at least three of the previous levels and two of the previous levels for unit members from the College of Education, the Chancellor shall advise the candidate in writing of the decision. The candidate is then entitled to a hearing with the Chancellor. The Chancellor may not promote any candidate who has not received positive recommendations at three review levels or two in the case of unit members from the College of Education. In the event a candidate receives three or more positive reviews or two in the case of a unit member from the College of Education, and the Chancellor does not grant promotion, the Chancellor shall provide specific written reasons to the candidate for that decision. It is understood that written reasons must include concerns in relation to the specific criteria for promotion provided for within the DocuSign Envelope ID: 46917469-4676-4CEF-85A2-BAE71CCBECE1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E84AD11-7BE4-4203-8004-8334FF2AC26C Agreement. It is further understood that where promotion and tenure are concerned the Department/College committees, Deans/Director and the University Rank and Tenure Committee shall submit written reasons for their respective decisions whether positive or negative.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement

for Promotion. All recommendations concerning faculty promotions are forwarded by the University Rank and Tenure Committee to the Chancellor of the University, who in turn makes a final decision. The Chancellor may elect not to grant promotion to candidates recommended at earlier levels. However, if the Chancellor fails to promote a candidate who has received positive recommendations from at least three of the previous levels and two of the previous levels for unit members from the College of Education, the Chancellor shall advise the candidate in writing of the decision. The candidate is then entitled to a hearing with the Chancellor. The Chancellor may not promote any candidate who has not received positive recommendations at three review levels or two in the case of unit members from the College of Education. In the event a candidate receives three or more positive reviews or two in the case of a unit member from the College of Education, and the Chancellor does not grant promotion, the Chancellor shall provide specific written reasons to the candidate for that decision. It is understood that written reasons must include concerns in relation to the specific criteria for promotion provided for within the Agreement. Agreement.‌‌‌‌ It is further understood that where promotion and tenure are concerned the Department/College committees, Deans/Director and the University Rank and Tenure Committee shall submit written reasons for their respective decisions whether positive or negative.

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement