Final Validation Taskleader Sample Clauses

Final Validation Taskleader. UNIPD The selected suppliers will carry out the testing and validation activities for the three software prototypes developed in WP6. Testing and validation will be based on the use of the data sets provided by the memory institutions. Each memory institution will prepare testing data sets extracted from their own repositories. The data sets will include data and metada covering the different media types addressed by the three software prototypes, i.e. documents, images and audiovisual material. One demonstration will be organised by the suppliers at the end of the testing period to present the result of the work done. The location of the demonstration will be agreed with the suppliers. Participant number 10 Participant short name 11 Person-months per participant 1 RA 2.00 6 UNIPD 2.00 7 BEELD EN GELUID 1.00 8 KIK-IRPA 2.00 9 GFC 2.00 10 LGMA 1.00 11 SPK 2.00 12 AJGI 2.00 ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Kultuuriministeerium 1.00 14 KUNGLIGA BIBLIOTEKET (NATIONAL LIBRARY O 2.00 Participant number 10 Participant short name 11 Person-months per participant Total 17.00 Delive- rable Number 61 Deliverable Title Lead benefi- ciary number Estimated indicative person- months Nature 62 Dissemi- nation level 63 Delivery date 64 Total 0.00 Schedule of relevant Milestones Milestone number 59 Milestone name Lead benefi- ciary number Delivery date from Annex I 60 Comments MS24 Testing completed 6 42 The testing phase is completed and final report on the implementation of the tender is delivered Project Number 1‌ 619568 Project Acronym 2 PREFORMA One form per Work Package Work package number 53 WP8 Type of activity 54 COORD Work package title Competitive Evaluation and Monitoring of the RTD work Start month 11 End month 42 Lead beneficiary number 55 6 Objectives WP8 has the following objectives: - to establish the competitive evaluation strategy to be used at the end of the Design phase 1 to chose the suppliers who continue the implementation of the tender - to support and monitor the execution of the tender, including its 3 phases (design, prototyping and testing) - to carry out the final assessment of the results of the tender Description of work and role of partners This WP8 is composed by 4 tasks: Task 8.1 Evaluation strategy Task Leader: UNIPD This task will define the evaluation strategy for comparing the results of the suppliers, at the end of the design phase. The evaluation framework will be defined by UNIPD, Fraunhofer and HS, while the memory institutions will add detailed ...
View Source

Related to Final Validation Taskleader

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

  • Office of Supplier Diversity The State of Florida supports its diverse business community by creating opportunities for woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises to participate in procurements and contracts. The Department encourages supplier diversity through certification of woman-, veteran-, and minority-owned small business enterprises and provides advocacy, outreach, and networking through regional business events. For additional information, please contact the Office of Supplier Diversity (OSD) at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.

  • Office of Supplier Development The State of Florida supports its business community by creating opportunities for business enterprises to participate in procurements and contracts. The Department encourages supplier development through certain certifications and provides advocacy, outreach, and networking through regional business events. For additional information, please contact the Office of Supplier Development (OSD) at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) (eff. Apr. 1, 2025, Section 544.0106, pursuant to House Bill 4611, Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S.) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Project Monitoring by the State The State may conduct on-site or off-site monitoring reviews of the Project during the term of this Grant Agreement and for up to ninety (90) days after it expires or is otherwise terminated. The Grantee shall extend its full cooperation and give full access to the Project site and to relevant documentation to the State or its authorized designees for the purpose of determining, among other things: A. whether Project activities are consistent with those set forth in Exhibit A, the Grant Application, and the terms and conditions of the Grant Agreement; B. the actual expenditure of state, local and/or private funds expended to date on the Project is in conformity with the amounts for each Budget line item as set forth in Exhibit B and that unpaid costs have been properly accrued; C. that Grantee is making timely progress with the Project, and that its project management, financial management and control systems, procurement systems and methods, and overall performance are in conformance with the requirements set forth in this Grant Agreement and are fully and accurately reflected in Project reports submitted to the State.