Final Score. The scores for the award criteria will be added up. The procurement contract will be awarded to the tenderer with the highest final score, after the contracting authority has verified the accuracy of the Declaration on honour of this tenderer and provided the control shows that the Declaration on honour corresponds with reality.
Final Score. “Potential for Harm” The scores of the three factors are added to provide a Potential for Harm score for each violation or group of violations. In this case, a final score of 6 was calculated. The total score is then used in Step 2 below.
Final Score. With respect to the purchase by the Issuer of Dealer Loans and related Seller Property on each Distribution Date during the Revolving Period, on each such Distribution Date, immediately after giving effect thereto, the weighted average of the Final Scores of all Contracts transferred on such Distribution Date is 665 or greater.
Final Score. Final Score = KRA Score (%) + CMC Score (%) = 54.6% + 24.3% = 79% SECTION D SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF THE PMDS 49 Checked by Moderation Committee for compliance end of April Performance Agreement Employee Supervisor Performance Management and Development System Level 1: Performance Agreement Level 2: Performance Assessment Moderated by Moderation Committee Mid-Term (July- Sept) Formal Review in writing 3rd Quarter (Oct-Dec) Informal / Oral Review. In writing if performance is unsatisfactory or needs to 1st Quarter (April-June) Informal / Oral Review. In writing if performance is unsatisfactory or needs to Annual Assessment (Jan- Mar) Performance Review and Assessment Cycle 50 Grievances / Disagreements Agreement Discuss to resolve Supervisor and Employee Disagreement Disagreement Moderation Committee Moderation Committee Discrepancy Agreement Disagreement Referred back to supervisor & employee Process ends Dispute resolution procedures Agreement Disagreement Process ends Dispute resolution procedures
Final Score. The final weighted scores from the quality evaluation and the final weighted scores from the price evaluation should be added together for each Supplier and Suppliers should be ranked based on their final total score; You may award the contract to the highest scoring/ranking Supplier, provided that they have passed any showstopper questions and they do not breach any quality thresholds you have stipulated within Attachment 2 – How to Bid; In Contract Award outcome letters, it is best practice to provide transparency as to the consensus scores and rationale statements each Supplier has achieved whether they were successful or not and their price ranking (i.e. 2nd/4th ); and You may also wish to include the relative advantages of the winning tender if you have decided to include a standstill period prior to Contract Execution. Contract Award Issue outcome letters to all successful and unsuccessful Suppliers including an overview of evaluation outcome as detailed above; Issue populated contract to successful Supplier (populate the Order Form and Schedules as appropriate with the winning Supplier’s price and quality submissions and where placeholders were left in place for information at contract award stage); Contract Execution - Stipulate a deadline for the Order Form to be signed and how this is to be carried out (e.g. in person; and Organise, as applicable, a Meeting of Principles, Introduction meetings and mobilisation kick-off workshop with your successful Supplier. Issue contract award notice via Contracts Finder; Provide feedback to unsuccessful Suppliers if requested; and Notify CCS of contract award and the date your services commence so that we can monitor spend and management information. To notify us, please submit the form entitled ‘RM6089 Contract Award Notification – For Mandatory Completion’ via xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx with email subject: ‘RM6089 Contract Award Notification’. Contact Us Email xxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx and reference ‘RM6089 Facilities Management Marketplace’ in the subject line.
Final Score o The final weighted scores from the quality evaluation and the final weighted scores from the price evaluation should be added together for each Supplier and Suppliers should be ranked based on their final total score; o You may award the contract to the highest scoring/ranking Supplier, provided that they have passed any showstopper questions and they do not breach any quality thresholds you have stipulated within Attachment 2 – How to Bid;
Final Score. The Final Score (NF) will be obtained by means of the formula below, using two decimal places: NF = N1 + N2 + N3 Where: • NF = Final score • N1 = Score of Required Experience and Equipment • N2 = Score of Technical Proposal The technical documents of each proponent will be evaluated and will be assigned an "evaluation score", ranging from 0 (zero) to 100 (one hundred) points. The proponent who obtain a zero score in any article (criterion), or even a score of less than 70 (seventy) points in the sum of the articles, will be disqualified.
Final Score. The final score of the candidate will be calculated by the sum of the score under the Educational and Professional Background and the Economic Proposal Final Score = (Technical Capabilities) + (Economic Proposal)
Final Score. Further, the final testing score shall be the arithmetic average of the written test and the oral examination. Scores, ranking and information from written tests, oral boards, etc. will be accessible to the appointing officer to assist in his evaluation of candidates for promotion.
Final Score. Harm or Potential Harm to Beneficial Uses The sum of the above scores is 7. This value is used in Step 2 as the “Potential for Harm” score.
