Common use of Factual Basis for Guilty Plea Clause in Contracts

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offenses to which the defendant is pleading guilty are as follows: In early 2008, the DEA and KCMOPD began an investigation into a loosely affiliated crack distribution ring operating in Kansas City, Missouri. That investigation eventually lead to a number of arrests and indictments and resulted in several cooperators. In the Spring and Summer of 2009, one of those cooperators began buying crack and powder cocaine from their Hispanic sources within the Western District of Missouri. Eventually, the cooperator worked up to buying direct from defendant XXXX XXXXXX, a/k/a CASPER. Over the course of several months sufficient probable cause was obtained to initiate Title III wire interceptions on XXXXXX’x phone in November 2009, and May and June of 2010. This indictment is a result of that investigation. XXXXXX was determined to be the main supplier for most of the indictees herein and XXXXXX had one main source, co-defendant XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX, and a few smaller, as needed, suppliers. While XXXXXX was mainly an ounce cocaine (crack and powder) supplier and pound marijuana supplier, he would try to accommodate whatever anyone wanted, with varying results.

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offenses to which the defendant is pleading guilty are as follows: In early 2008, the DEA and KCMOPD began an investigation into a loosely affiliated crack distribution ring operating in Kansas City, Missouri. That investigation eventually lead to a number of arrests and indictments and resulted in several cooperators. In the Spring and Summer of 2009, one of those cooperators began buying crack and powder cocaine from their Hispanic sources within the Western District of Missouri. Eventually, the cooperator worked up to buying direct from defendant XXXX XXXXXX, a/k/a CASPER. Over the course of several months sufficient probable cause was obtained to initiate Title III wire interceptions on XXXXXX’x phone in November 2009November, 2009 and May and June of 2010. This indictment is a result of that investigation. XXXXXX was determined to be the main supplier for most of the indictees herein and XXXXXX had one main source, co-defendant XXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXX, and a few smaller, as needed, suppliers. While XXXXXX was mainly an ounce cocaine (crack and powder) supplier and pound marijuana supplier, he would try to accommodate whatever anyone wanted, with varying results.