Common use of Factual Basis for Guilty Plea Clause in Contracts

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offense to which he is pleading guilty are as follows: Beginning about February 2005 and continuing through about May 21, 2007, at Xxx’x Summit and Raymore, in the Western District of Missouri, and elsewhere, defendant Xxxxx conspired with others including co-defendants Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, and others including Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, to obtain money from mortgage lenders and title companies, and to retain the money obtained, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and by the concealment of material facts, and in the execution of the scheme to commit the offenses of interstate transportation of funds obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.§§ 1343 and 2. The defendant does not dispute that as part of the scheme, the co-conspirators:

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offense to which he is pleading guilty are as follows: Beginning about February 2005 April 2006 and continuing through about May 21, 2007, at Xxx’x Summit and Raymore, in the Western District of Missouri, and elsewhere, defendant Xxxxx Xxxxxxx conspired with others including co-defendants Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, and others including Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, to obtain money from mortgage lenders and title companies, and to retain the money obtained, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and by the concealment of material facts, and in the execution of the scheme to commit the offenses of interstate transportation of funds obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.§§ 1343 and 2. The defendant does not dispute that as As part of the scheme, the co-conspiratorscoconspirators:

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offense to which he is pleading guilty are as follows: Beginning about February 2005 and continuing through about May 21, 2007, at Xxx’x Summit and Raymore, in the Western District of Missouri, and elsewhere, defendant Xxxxx conspired with others including co-defendants Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, and others including Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, to obtain money from mortgage lenders and title companies, and to retain the money obtained, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and by the concealment of material facts, and in the execution of the scheme to commit the offenses of interstate transportation of funds obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.§§ 1343 and 2. The defendant does not dispute that as As part of the scheme, the co-conspiratorscoconspirators:

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offense to which he is pleading guilty are as follows: Beginning about February 2005 and continuing through about May 21, 2007, at Xxx’x Summit and Raymore, in the Western District of Missouri, and elsewhere, defendant Xxxxx conspired with others including co-defendants defendant Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, and others including Xxxxx XxxxxxxXxxxxxx and Xxxx Xxxxxx, to obtain money from mortgage lenders and title companies, and to retain the money obtained, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and by the concealment of material facts, and in the execution of the scheme to commit the offenses of interstate transportation of funds obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.§§ 1343 and 2. The defendant does not dispute that as As part of the scheme, the co-conspirators:

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offense to which he is pleading guilty are as follows: Beginning about February 2005 and continuing through about May 21, 2007, at Xxx’x Summit and Raymore, in the Western District of Missouri, and elsewhere, defendant Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx conspired with others including co-defendants Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, and others including Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, to obtain money from mortgage lenders and title companies, and to retain the money obtained, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and by the concealment of material facts, and in the execution of the scheme to commit the offenses of interstate transportation of funds obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.§§ 1343 and 2. The defendant does not dispute that as As part of the scheme, the co-conspiratorscoconspirators:

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offense to which he is pleading guilty are as follows: Beginning about February in 2005 and continuing through about May 21, 2007ending in 2006, at Xxx’x Summit and RaymoreSummit, in the Western District of Missouri, and elsewhere, defendant Xxxxx Xxxxxx, a mortgage loan officer at Midwest Equity Mortgage, conspired with others including co-defendants Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx XxxxxxXxxxx Xxxxxxx, and others including Xxxxx XxxxxxxXxxxxxx Xxxxx, and others, to obtain money from mortgage lenders and title companies, and to retain the money obtained, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and by the concealment of material facts, and in the execution of the scheme to commit the offenses of interstate transportation of funds obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.§§ 1343 and 2. The defendant does not dispute that as As part of the scheme, the co-conspiratorsXxxxxx:

Factual Basis for Guilty Plea. The parties agree that the facts constituting the offense to which he she is pleading guilty are as follows: Beginning about February 2005 and continuing through about May 21, 2007, at Xxx’x Summit and Raymore, in the Western District of Missouri, and elsewhere, defendant Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx conspired with others including co-defendants Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx (her husband) and Xxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, and others including Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, to obtain money from a mortgage lenders lender and title companiescompany, and to retain the money obtained, by means of material false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, and by the concealment of material facts, and in the execution of the scheme to commit the offenses of interstate transportation of funds obtained by fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2314 and 2, and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.§§ 1343 and 2. The defendant does not dispute that as As part of the scheme, the co-conspirators: