Facility Review Clause Samples
The Facility Review clause establishes the right of one party, typically a lender or lessor, to periodically assess the condition, use, or compliance of a facility or asset covered by an agreement. This review may involve scheduled inspections, audits, or the submission of reports by the party in possession of the facility. By enabling regular oversight, the clause helps ensure that the facility is maintained according to agreed standards and that any issues are identified and addressed promptly, thereby protecting the interests of the party granting the facility and mitigating potential risks.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 3 times
Facility Review. 7.1 All existing and future Moorhead BES Facilities and other facilities under this Procedure to be operated or controlled by WAPA-UGPR shall be reviewed by WAPA-UGPR to ensure they meet WAPA-UGPR’s interconnection requirements.
7.2 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ BES Facilities and other facilities not currently meeting WAPA- UGPR’s interconnection requirements shall be modified or upgraded as soon as practical, but no later than two years from the effective date of this Procedure. Moorhead will provide notification to WAPA-UGPR upon completion of activities.
7.3 All Transmission Elements operated at 100-kV or higher, as well as Real Power and Reactive Power resources connected at 100-kV or higher are considered BES, unless modified by inclusion or exclusion from the BES, in accordance with the NERC definition effective July 1, 2014. Moorhead will provide BES self- determination or BES exclusion documentation for all BES Facilities and other facilities excluded from the BES under this Procedure for the purpose of clearly delineating facilities that shall be considered part of the BES.
7.4 Prior to upgrade or modification to an existing Moorhead BES Facility or other facility or building a new BES Facility or other facility, for which WAPA-UGPR will have dispatching jurisdiction or operational control, Moorhead agrees to provide WAPA-UGPR with preliminary information for review as outlined in Section 8.2.
Facility Review. A facility review of this directive shall be conducted annually.
Facility Review a. The state reserves the right to conduct a review of any facility that is proposed for use or actually used by the Contractor under this contract. Facility reviews may be conducted at any Primary Receiving and Final Recycling, Treatment, Storage, Disposal Facility (RTSDF) and includes but not limited to transfer, consolidation, storage facilities, and transportation companies in which dangerous waste will be managed under this contract.
b. Contractor shall be responsible for the costs associated with on-site facility reviews and obtaining documentation for facility reviews. The Facility Review committee members shall receive agency travel authorization, and pay all their travel related expenses costs of obtaining documents for facility reviews through their agencies related to any facility reviews. All facility review costs incurred will originally be paid by the review committee’s respective agency. The facility review committee member’s agency shall submit a travel expense report and document cost record to the DES Procurement Coordinator. All travel expenses and related forms are subject to State of Washington Office of Financial Management guidelines related to travel (▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/resources/travel.asp). DES shall invoice the Contractor for the amount of the travel expense report and cost of obtaining documents, and then the Contractor shall have thirty (30) calendar days to pay DES. DES shall reimburse the facility review committee member’s agency within thirty (30) calendar days of receiving the facility review expense report by means of a state warrant or electronic payment.
Facility Review. The Local Program shall provide the facility no more than 30 days to review the draft permit prior to the start of the public comment period.
Facility Review. A review of facilities may be initiated by the Bank from time to time and Borrower shall be requested to supply additional information to facilitate such review. The next review is scheduled for July 1997. As this facility has been extended on an uncommitted basis, the above mentioned review process does not imply a renewal, and the facility shall at all times be subject to satisfactory review at least annually.
Facility Review. Contractor shall conduct Facility reviews on all Primary Care provider Service Sites as part of the Credentialing procedures using the May 24, 2000 DHS approved document entitled “Healthy San Diego Facility Evaluation Policy and Procedure Resource Manual”, as may be amended or superceded, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Facility Review