Expressions Sample Clauses
The 'Expressions' clause defines how certain words, phrases, or mathematical formulas are to be interpreted within the contract. It typically clarifies the meaning of specific terms, symbols, or calculations that are used throughout the agreement, ensuring that all parties have a shared understanding. For example, it may specify how interest rates are calculated or how particular terms are to be construed in context. This clause is essential for preventing ambiguity and disputes by providing clear guidance on the interpretation of key expressions used in the contract.
Expressions. Expressions defined in the Agency Agreement and in the sets of terms and conditions of the Notes as set out in the Prospectus and not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the same meanings in this Agreement, except where the context otherwise requires.
Expressions. Expressions defined elsewhere in this Agreement shall have the meanings so indicated. Expressions defined in the Dealer Agreement and the sets of Terms and Conditions and not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the same meanings in this Agreement, except where the context otherwise requires.
Expressions. The expressions “the Developer” and “the Council” shall where the context so requires and admits include their respective successors in title and assigns
Expressions. Expressions have not been a part of EAST-ADL, but fit well in the EAValue framework. The timing- related extensions to EAST-ADL that were provided by the TIMMO project contained a solid basis for such an expression concept. The main effort in MAENAD was to integrate these expression in the EAST-ADL core. The below figure shows, how EAExpressions were integrated as special subclasses of EAValue.
Expressions normal-expression non-terminal, previously introduced in the syntax specification “literal-expression” exact wording or notation to be used in a BRAWL expression bold-expression Non-terminal, defined further on in the syntax specification Specification:
Expressions. Capitalised expressions which are not defined in this clause but which have a defined meaning in the GST Law have the same meaning in this clause. In this Contract:
Expressions. Expressions used in this Agreement without definition that are defined in or defined by reference in the Facilities Agreement shall have the same meanings when used in this Agreement.
Expressions. The expressions “Grantor” and “
Expressions. ■ Share with each other statements of vision and mission for greater understanding of one another. ■ Continue to embrace and practice transparency and mutual accountability in our ongoing relationship as partners. ■ Be “walking partners” with one another as we pray for each other weekly. ■ Be alert to the needs of each other as we communicate regularly through e-mail, newsletters and visits. ■ Encourage congregations of each synod to become “companion congregations” as a means to grow in relationship with one another. Begin with 10 congregational partnerships. ■ Develop exchange programs with mutually agreed upon scheduled visits to focus on: ¤ healthcare; ¤ education, both secular and theological; ¤ youth; and ¤ women to women. ■ Consider support of project possibilities, such as Rural Development and the NELC Don Bosco School, evaluating long-term sustainability. ■ Explore possibilities for marketing weavings and tea through fair trade. ■ Create a second devotional booklet with submitted writings from both the NELC and SCSW. ■ Review annually this covenant as an expression of our developing relationship. Initiated at the Joint Synod Consultation, Chennai, India, October 11–12, 2005: NORTHERN EVANGELICAL SOUTH CENTRAL SYNOD LUTHERAN CHURCH IN INDIA (NELC) OF WISCONSIN (SCSW-ELCA) Bishop_ Bishop_ _ _ 74 Companion Synod Handbook Application for Companion Delegation Trip BASIC DATA _ _ _ _ Last name First MI _ _ _ _ Address _ _ _ _ City State Zip Code _ _ _ _ Home Phone Work Phone E-mail _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Spring 2010 75 Our companion synod relationship is one of accompaniment, i.e. walking together. Please share your ideas about examples of how this accompaniment might be expressed with our brothers and sisters in _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ General health _ _ _ _ □ Excellent □ Good □ Fair Allergies? Dietary restrictions? Physical challenges? Emotional challenges? If yes, explain: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ □ Yes □ No If yes, please explain and list medications _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ □ Yes □ No □ Yes □ No If yes, please list: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Expressions. A VDM program variable x pairs a name (xn ∈ VarId) with a type (xτ ∈ Tsl). The state of a program σ is a finite partial function from variable names to values Σ ¾ {f : VarId →› › Usl | ∀ x • f (x) : xτ }. A VDM-SL expression of type τ is then modelled as a partial sl function from state bindings to values, that is E τ ¾ {f : Σ → Usl | ∀ σ • f (σ) ∈ ¢τ ¢sl}. This semantic characterisation of expressions means we can give semantics to expression operators by lifting corresponding functions of the underlying logic, such as Isabelle/HOL. We thus define combinators for expression liftings. ⊥sl = ∅ lit(v) = {σ ›→ v | σ ∈ Σ} { ›→ | ∈ ∧ ∈ } uop(f , e) = σ f (e(σ)) σ dom(e) e(σ) dom(f ) (e (σ), e (σ)) ∈ dom(f )1 ▇ ▇▇▇(▇ , ▇▇, ▇▇) = .▇ ›→ ▇ (▇▇(▇), ▇▇(▇)). σ ∈ dom(e1) ∩ dom(e2) ∧ ▇ ▇▇▇▇(▇ , ▇▇, ▇▇, e3) = σ ›→ f e2(σ), . (e1(σ), e2(σ), e3(σ)) ∈ dom(f ) e1(σ), . σ ∈ dom(e1) ∩ dom(e2) ∩ dom(e3) ∧ e3(σ) ∈ ⊥ Expression sl is the undefined expression. Expression lit(v) takes a value in the un- derlying logic, v W, and constructs a literal expression; it is constant for every state. Combinators uop(f ), bop(f ), and trop(f ) construct unary, binary, and ternary expressions