Evidence. In any prosecution under this Part an averment in the prosecution notice — (a) that the place at or in respect of which a contravention of this Part is alleged to have occurred was, or was within, a designated area; or (b) that a place was a controlled access point for a specified purpose; or (c) that a person was at a material time a security officer, shall be deemed to be proved in the absence of proof to the contrary.
Appears in 63 contracts
Sources: Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement, Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement, Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement
Evidence. In any prosecution under this Part an averment in the prosecution notice complaint —
(a) that the place at or in respect of which a contravention of this Part is alleged to have occurred was, or was within, a designated area; or
(b) that a place was a controlled access point for a specified purpose; or
(c) that a person was at a material time a security officer, shall be deemed to be proved in the absence of proof to the contrary.
Appears in 4 contracts
Sources: Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 1981, Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 1981, Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement Act 1981
Evidence. In any prosecution under this Part an averment in the prosecution notice —
(a) that the place at or in respect of which a contravention of this Part is alleged to have occurred was, or was within, a designated area; or
(b) that a place was a controlled access point for a specified purpose; or
(c) that a person was at a material time a security officer, shall be deemed to be proved in the absence of proof to the contrary. [Section 24 amended by No. 84 of 2004 s. 79.]
Appears in 4 contracts
Sources: Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement, Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement, Diamond (Argyle Diamond Mines Joint Venture) Agreement