Common use of Evaluation Activities Clause in Contracts

Evaluation Activities. The evaluation process used by the committee must include the following activities: A. Completion by the probationer of required orientation activities, including reviews of (a) the duties and responsibilities of instructors, (b) guidelines for probationary review committees, and (c) departmental objectives, the probationer’s job description, and teaching and/or work assignment. B. The teaching effectiveness professional development plan (see Appendix H) or the work plan (see 811.1) includes a set of long-range and quarterly goals with supporting activities, that are mutually agreed upon by the probationer and the probationary review committee. If mutual agreement cannot be reached, the vice president of instruction will make the final decision. In cases where major revision is desired, the goals and objectives should be re-submitted for approval. It is the responsibility of the committee to determine when an adjustment requires resubmission. C. The collection and evaluation of quarterly Student Appraisals of Instruction using district evaluation forms developed under Article 803.1 or, in the case of non- teaching faculty, appraisal data collected from clients served; D. Observations of probationer teaching in classroom, lab, online, hybrid, and/or clinical settings or, for non-teaching faculty, carrying out their duties; E. Peer evaluations by the members of the probationer’s department, collected at least annually, utilizing a form mutually agreed upon by the District and the LCCFAHE. Faculty, staff, and other individuals may be added to the group participating in the probationer’s peer evaluation provided that they have sufficient interaction with the probationer, and a majority of the review committee members approve of the additions. F. Attendance at one of each of the following committee or council meetings: Curriculum Committee, Instructional Assessment Committee, Academic Standards Committee, Instructional Council, Governance Council, and the College Board of Trustees. Meeting minutes listing the probationer’s name as a guest are suggested as a method of documenting progress. G. Assessment by the probationer’s supervisor, reported at review committee meetings, reviewing general aspects of the probationer’s performance. H. An annual written self-evaluation by the probationer assessing evaluation data, summarizing progress towards goals and objectives, and summarizing actions taken or contemplated in order to address areas of concern. Additional evaluation methods and activities may be mutually developed by the probationer and the committee and used to evaluate performance.

Evaluation Activities. The evaluation process used by the committee must include the following activities: A. Completion by the probationer of required orientation activities, including reviews of (a) the duties and responsibilities of instructors, (b) guidelines for probationary review committees, and (c) departmental objectives, the probationer’s job description, and teaching and/or work assignment. B. The teaching effectiveness professional development plan (see Appendix H) or the work plan (see 811.1) of a Teaching Effectiveness Plan/Professional Development Plan that includes a mutually agreed-to set of long-range and quarterly goals with supporting activities, that are mutually agreed upon by subject to approval of the Vice President of Instruction. The probationary committee and the probationer may mutually agree to adjust goals and objectives after the probationary review committee. If mutual agreement canVice President of Instruction has approved them, provided that the adjustments do not be reached, significantly alter the vice president main direction of instruction will make the final decisionprobationer’s efforts. In cases where major revision is desired, the goals and objectives should be re-submitted for approval. It is the responsibility of the committee to determine when an adjustment requires resubmission. C. The collection and evaluation of quarterly Student Appraisals of Instruction using district evaluation forms developed under Article 803.1 or, in the case of non- teaching faculty, appraisal data collected from clients served; D. Observations of probationer teaching in classroom, lab, online, hybrid, and/or clinical settings or, for non-teaching faculty, carrying out their duties; E. Peer evaluations by the members of the probationer’s department, collected at least annually, utilizing a form mutually agreed upon by the District and the LCCFAHE. Faculty, staff, and other individuals may be added to the group participating in the probationer’s peer evaluation provided that they have sufficient interaction with the probationer, and a majority of the review committee members approve of the additions. F. Attendance at one of each of the following committee or council meetings: Curriculum Committee, Instructional Assessment Committee, Academic Standards Committee, Instructional Council, Governance Council, and the College Board of Trustees. Meeting minutes listing the probationer’s name as a guest are suggested as a method of documenting progress. G. Assessment by the probationer’s supervisor, reported at review committee meetings, reviewing general aspects of the probationer’s performance. H. An annual written self-evaluation by the probationer assessing evaluation data, summarizing progress towards goals and objectives, and summarizing actions taken or contemplated in order to address areas of concern. Additional evaluation methods and activities may be mutually developed by the probationer and the committee and used to evaluate performance.

Evaluation Activities. The evaluation process used by the committee must include the following activities: A. Completion by the probationer of required orientation activities, including reviews of (a) the duties and responsibilities of instructors, (b) guidelines for probationary review committees, and (c) departmental objectives, the probationer’s job description, and teaching and/or work assignment. B. The teaching effectiveness professional development plan (see Appendix H) or the work plan (see 811.1) includes a set of long-range and quarterly goals with supporting activities, that are mutually agreed upon by the probationer and the probationary review committee. If mutual agreement cannot be reached, the vice president of instruction will make the final decision. In cases where major revision is desired, the goals and objectives should be re-submitted for approval. It is the responsibility of the committee to determine when an adjustment requires resubmission. C. The collection and evaluation of quarterly Student Appraisals of Instruction using district evaluation forms developed under Article 803.1 or, in the case of non- teaching faculty, appraisal data collected from clients served; D. Observations of probationer teaching in classroom, lab, online, hybrid, and/or clinical settings or, for non-teaching faculty, carrying out their duties; E. Peer evaluations by the members of the probationer’s department, collected at least annually, utilizing a form mutually agreed upon by the District and the LCCFAHE. Faculty, staff, and other individuals may be added to the group participating in the probationer’s peer evaluation provided that they have sufficient interaction with the probationer, and a majority of the review committee members approve of the additions. F. Attendance at one of each of the following committee or council meetings: Curriculum Committee, Instructional Assessment Committee, Academic Standards Committee, Instructional Council, Governance Council, and the College Board of Trustees. Meeting minutes listing the probationer’s name as a guest are suggested as a method of documenting progress. G. Assessment by the probationer’s supervisor, reported at review committee meetings, reviewing general aspects of the probationer’s performance. H. An annual written self-evaluation by the probationer assessing evaluation data, summarizing progress towards goals and objectives, and summarizing actions taken or contemplated in order to address areas of concern. Additional evaluation methods and activities may be mutually developed by the probationer and the committee and used to evaluate performance.