CPM. Critical Path Scheduling. The CPM will list work tasks, their durations, milestones and their dates, and State/Local review periods.
CPM. 10.1 You acknowledge that our ability to deliver CPM is subject to audience delivery variations across all Activity. We will use our reasonable endeavours to maintain CPM within a 10% tolerance of the CPM specified in the Booking Order.
CPM. The Contractor shall prepare in a format and with a level of detail acceptable to the Owner (as described in Exhibit J attached), a detailed CPM schedule incorporating the following:
CPM. The Schedule shall include a critical path method (“CPM”) diagram schedule showing the sequence of activities, the interdependence of each activity and identifies the critical path. The CPM diagram schedule shall be in calendar days and indicate duration, earliest and latest start and finish dates for all activities, and total float times for all activities except critical activities. The CPM diagram shall be presented in a time scaled graphical format for the Project as a whole.
CPM. The critical path method giving a detailed scheduling method used to allocate the time required for a construction project, and a means of controlling costs and manpower that has been reviewed by the Engineer and accepted by the Owner.
CPM. 8.1 Advertiser acknowledges that NETWORK 10’s ability to deliver CPM is subject to audience delivery variations across all the booking. NETWORK 10 will use its reasonable endeavours to maintain CPM within a 10% tolerance of the CPM specified in the applicable Booking Document.
CPM. The CPM was implemented as a single PEIS component. The main tuple-based interface of the CPM was as follows. • Goals were accepted by the CPM subscribing to service request tuples, like: ⟨ ⟩ service.463.request.type, LOAD_LAUNDRY These were typically produced by the web server PEIS. • Commands to any entity (e.g., robots, web server, elevator) were queued by sending out a set of tuples to that entity, like: ⟨ doro1.moveto.77.parameters, (5.14 -2.15 1.57) ⟩ ⟨ doro1.moveto.77.input, NONE ⟩ ⟨ doro1.moveto.77.command, IDLE ⟩ • A queued command was put in execution by setting the corresponding command tuple to ON, like: ⟨ doro1.moveto.77.command, ON ⟩ • The status of a command in execution was provided by the corresponding state tuple, like: ⟨ ⟩ doro1.moveto.77.state, COMPLETED The CPM accessed this status by subscribing to this state tuple from the relevant entity. • Information about the current context was provided by the CAM by publishing tuples of the form ⟨ ⟩ context.user.location.topological, L1_C1 The CPM accessed this information by subscribing to the relevant context tuples from the CAM.
CPM. The Ad Quality monitoring will isolate and block ad impressions that do not meet industry standards. Platform Integration Cost: WAIVED Net Revenue: Revenue attributable to Publisher less BPA and third-party fees. Optional Consulting Services: • Yield, inventory, and viewability audit/optimizations – One-time $2,000 flat fee per site • Ad server and ad tech development support- $175 per hour • Ad Ops, PMP, or data operations support - $175 per hour TERMS AND CONDITIONS
CPM of assessed rivers and estuaries with healthy aquatic communities This information is readily available in Ecology’s CWA 305b reports.
CPM. List the state priority waters/watersheds that are impaired or in need of special protection that have been identified (e.g., through a 303(d) listing or Unified Watershed Assessment or through a basin planning and management process); and, for those waters indicate whether or not: (1) action strategies have been developed that include actions needed to attain Water Quality Standards; and (2) measurable environmental improvements have occurred in the last two years (phase in 1 and 2 in FY2000). This core performance measure, related to the 303d list of impaired water bodies, is reported to EPA. The requirements of sub-part 1 will begin to be addressed through implementation of the TMDL settlement agreement and the agreed upon schedule of 15 years for conducting TMDLs for waters on the 1996 303d list. (See Activity III.A.1. Below.) The recently developed water quality index and environmental indicators for water quality will satisfy the requirements of sub-part 2.
