CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS Sample Clauses

CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. The designated Government representative is required to complete an Interagency Mobile Shower Facility Services Performance Evaluation Form (See Section J, Form 1276-F) prior to leaving each incident or prior to team transitions. The designated Government representative is required to distribute the completed copies of the evaluation as instructed on the form. (Do not send copies of the evaluation form to the Albuquerque Service Center). The form, in addition to other performance information which may become available, will be utilized to facilitate the Contractor’s annual performance report. The CO will provide the Contractor 30 calendar days to respond to any negative performance information received.
View SourceView Similar (5)
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. A. The Contractor, by entering the Construction Contract, consents to the evaluation of its performance by the Department and/or the Department’s designee and understands that any such evaluation may be used in future procurements to determine Contractor’s responsibility. The Department and/or the Department’s designee shall provide the Contractor with written notice of any unsatisfactory evaluations and the reasons therefore. Contractor shall be entitled to submit a reply.
View SourceView Similar (3)
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. CalRecycle will evaluate the Contractor’s performance within sixty days of the completion of this Agreement and shall remain on file by CalRecycle for a period of thirty-six months. If the Contractor does not satisfactorily perform the work or service specified in this Agreement, CalRecycle will submit a copy of the negative evaluation to the Department of General Services (DGS), Office of Legal Services, within five (5) working days of the completion of the evaluation. Upon filing an unsatisfactory evaluation with the DGS, CalRecycle shall notify and send a copy of the evaluation to the Contractor within fifteen days. The Contractor shall have thirty days to prepare and send a written response to CalRecycle and the DGS. CalRecycle and the DGS shall file the Contractor's statement with the evaluation. (PCC §10369).
View SourceView Similar (2)
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. For IT Services over $500,000, within sixty (60) days after the completion of the Contract, the Program Manager shall complete a written evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract. A copy of the STD 971 must be emailed to the State Department of Technology at and shall remain in the contract file for 36 months. If the Contractor did not satisfactorily perform the work, a copy of the evaluation form will be sent to the Contractor within fifteen (15) working days of the completion of the evaluation. (PCC 12102.3). You may view the form here: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/dgs/fmc/pdf/std971.pdf
View Source
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. For IT Services over $500,000, within sixty (60) days after the completion of the Contract, the Program Manager shall complete a written evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract. A copy of the STD 971 must be emailed to the State Department of Technology at and shall remain in the contract file for 36 months. If the Contractor did not satisfactorily perform the work, a copy of the evaluation form will be sent to the Contractor within fifteen (15) working days of the completion of the evaluation. (PCC 12102.3). You may view the form here: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇▇/dgs/fmc/pdf/std971.pdf EDD Contract No. M53787-7100 Am 2 EDD/Deloitte Consulting LLP This Contract is valid and enforceable only if (1) sufficient funds are made available by the State Budget Act of the appropriate State Fiscal Year(s) covered by this Agreement for the purposes of this program; and (2) sufficient funds are made available to the State by the United States Government or by the State of California for the Fiscal Year(s) covered by this Contract for the purposes of this program. In addition, this Contract is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations or conditions established by the United States Government and/or the State of California, or any statute enacted by the Congress and Legislature, which may affect the provisions, terms or funding of the Contract in any manner. The parties mutually agree that if the Congress and/or Legislature does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall be amended to reflect any reduction in funds.
View Source
CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS. Pursuant to PCC Sections10367 and 10369, each contractor providing consultant services of $5,000 or more shall be advised in writing on the standard contract that the performance will be evaluated. One Contract/Contractor Evaluation, form STD 4, must be prepared within 60 days of the completion of the contract. The form shall be uploaded into FI$Cal and kept as part of the procurement file. The agency shall document the performance of the contractor in doing the work or in delivering the services for which the contract was awarded. The evaluations shall remain on file by the agency for a period of 36 months. If the contractor did not satisfactorily perform the work or service specified in the contract, the agency conducting the evaluation shall place one copy of the evaluation form in a separate agency contract file and send one copy of the form to DGS/OLS within five working days of the completion of the evaluation. (SCM Volume 1, section 3.02.5) On filing an unsatisfactory evaluation with DGS/OLS, the state agency shall notify and send a copy of the evaluation to the contractor within 15 days. The contractor shall have 30 days to prepare a statement defending his or her performance under the contract and to send it to the agency and the department. The contractor's statement shall be filed with the evaluation in the agency's separate contract file and in DGS/OLS's files. The evaluations and contractor responses on file with the agencies and DGS/OLS are not public records; they should be maintained in a separate file.
View Source

Related to CONTRACTOR EVALUATIONS

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 6.1 Administrators will meet with new employees to discuss their job description within one (1) month of hire. The Administrator and new employee will sign off on the job description and it will be forwarded to the Human Resources Department for inclusion in the employee‘s personnel file. The Human Resources Department will compile and distribute a list showing each employee‘s evaluator prior to November 1st of each year. Bargaining unit job descriptions will be made available via the District‘s web site. 6.2 Evaluations will transpire as follows for employees that are receiving satisfactory ratings: a. New hires—regular part-time (school year employees) will be evaluated at three (3) and six (6) working months. b. New hires—full time (12 month employees) will be evaluated at three (3), six (6) and twelve (12) months. c. After the initial year of employment, each employee shall be evaluated at least once annually by March 31st. 6.3 Criteria for evaluating bargaining unit members will be based on the performance categories outlined on the evaluation form as related to the job description of their specific position assignment. 6.4 Evaluation reports shall include feedback regarding strengths and weaknesses (if any) demonstrated by the employee. Prior to an employee receiving a rating less than “Meets Expectations,” the employee shall be advised of the performance concern and provided with a clear statement of any deficiency and a statement defining acceptable performance. This shall occur within a reasonable time prior to the final evaluation to allow the employee a chance to demonstrate improvement. 6.5 In the event an employee is evaluated overall as “Does Not Meet Expectations,” the district, in consultation with the employee and the Association, will provide the employee a written plan of improvement (See Employee Plan of Improvement form in Appendix). The plan shall clearly define all areas of deficiency, provide clear and attainable performance goals, and outline supports (if any) to be given, including any necessary training at the District’s expense. The employee will be given a reasonable amount of time, not to exceed sixty (60) working days, to meet job performance expectations. During the improvement period, feedback will be provided through a minimum of three scheduled meetings. Following the completion of the plan, the supervisor shall notify the employee in writing of the outcome. Failure to demonstrate satisfactory improvement may constitute grounds for termination. 6.6 The bargaining unit member shall be given a copy of their evaluation, and any data collection sheets (with the submitters name excluded) used in the evaluation. 6.7 Under the law there is no right to Association Representation at evaluation conferences. 6.8 Any information shared with the evaluating administrator for the evaluation process shall be recorded on Data Collection Sheet(s), with the exception of those unit members that have supervising teachers. Supervising teachers will work directly with the evaluating administrator to share performance information for inclusion in the unit member‘s evaluation. 6.9 Employees shall have the right to respond to evaluations in writing. Such written response shall be attached to the evaluation if received within 5 days. 6.10 No bargaining unit member shall be required to sign a blank or incomplete evaluation form.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. The administration will be evaluating the teacher’s performance within the time of formal responsibility. The evaluation process and form will be shared with the Association Building Representatives at the beginning of each school year. (a) Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least two (2) times a year. The first evaluation will be completed prior to December 1st and the second prior to April 15th. Each evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations, on the performance of other duties and responsibilities and the goals developed in the Individualized Development Plan (IDP). The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at anytime prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the probationary teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. (b) Tenured teachers will be evaluated on a rotating schedule, but no less than once every three- (3) years. The administration reserves the right to evaluate a tenured teacher more often. The evaluation will be based upon announced, unannounced, informal observations and on the performance of other duties and responsibilities. The announced and unannounced observations should be a minimum of thirty (30) minutes in length. The observations may occur at any time prior to the development of the written evaluation, but at least one of them must be planned in consultation with the tenured teacher. The results of formal observations will be discussed with the teacher in a timely manner. The information gathered during the observations will be used to write the evaluations. 2. The administrator shall prepare and submit a written evaluation and recommendations to the teacher prior to May 30th of the year they are evaluated. The administrator shall hold a conference with the teacher to discuss the written evaluation and recommendations. 3. Upon receipt of the evaluation the teacher will sign the form indicating his/her receipt of the report. The signature on the form does not constitute his/her approval unless specifically noted. 4. Teachers involved with the instruction of Advanced Placement courses will be evaluated. This evaluation in the first year will be made part of the formal evaluation only at the request of the teacher. B. A teacher who disagrees with the content or procedure of evaluation may submit a written answer which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation in question and/or submit any complaints through Level 4 of the grievance procedure. C. If an administrator believes a teacher is doing unacceptable work, the reasons shall be set forth in specific terms. Included will be examples of specific ways in which the teacher is to improve and assistance may be given by the administrator and other staff members. In subsequent conferences it shall be the responsibility of the individual teacher to inquire whether adequate improvement has taken place. D. Monitoring and observation of the work performance of the teacher shall be conducted openly. The public address or audio system or similar types of communications will not be used for the purpose of evaluation. E. The Board and the Association recognize that the ability of pupils to progress and mature academically is a combined result of the school, home, economic and social environment and that teachers alone cannot be held accountable for all aspects of the academic achievement of the pupil in the classroom. Test results of academic progress of students shall not be used as the sole determinant or in isolated instances to evaluate the quality of a teacher's service or fitness for retention. F. All communications, including evaluations by Milan Administrators, commendations, and documented complaints directed toward the teacher which are to be included in the personnel file shall be made available for review of the teacher prior to placement in the file; a copy of any such communication will be provided to the teacher at this time. Pre-placement information such as confidential credentials, letters of reference from universities, individuals, or previous employers are exempt from such review. A written statement for inclusion in the personnel file may then be made by the teacher in regard to materials that were not signed by the teacher. A representative of the Association may accompany the teacher. G. Ordinarily, observations of teachers shall not be for less than a full class period or for the duration of a particular teaching lesson.