Course Evaluation Sample Clauses
The Course Evaluation clause establishes the process and criteria for assessing the effectiveness and quality of a course. Typically, this involves collecting feedback from participants through surveys or assessments, and may require instructors or administrators to review and analyze the results. By formalizing how course performance is measured, this clause ensures continuous improvement and accountability in educational programs.
Course Evaluation. For every UW course, Teachers will assist in informing students about the online UW end-of- course evaluations, which are to be completed by students registered for UW credit. The evaluation results will be shared with the appropriate UW academic department and the Teacher.
Course Evaluation. An evaluation of the course after its completion may be required.
Course Evaluation. Peers or administrators with online or hybrid teaching expertise, appointed by the appropriate ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ oversee development and evaluation of new online or hybrid classes in the first year of offering.
Course Evaluation. Course evaluation results shall now be available in electronic format only.
Course Evaluation. As part of a comprehensive teaching evaluation system, a ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ develop, administer, and use appropriate student course/instructor evaluation forms, following consultation in committee. The Faculty Association and the University agree that student course/instructor evaluations are intended to solicit student learning experiences. These evaluations do not constitute unequivocal measures of teaching effectiveness, and may be affected by bias. These evaluations may only be used as part of a more comprehensive teaching evaluation system which may include other measures of student impact, peer evaluation, and reflective thought from the member. Such a system, if developed, shall be created in consultation with the academic staff members of the appropriate Faculty and included in the faculty Criteria Documents. When the information from student course/instructor evaluations is used, it will be in an aggregated or summarized form. Anonymous student comments gathered in the course/instructor evaluation process shall not be included in the aggregated or summarized forms. It is the member’s choice to provide students’ comments, but if they choose to do so, they must provide the complete set of students’ comments from the course. An academic staff member who does not wish to use the form which is in current use may make a written proposal to the ▇▇▇▇ suggesting an alternative method of student course/instructor evaluation.
Course Evaluation. VAR shall survey all students upon completion of the course. Survey results will be shared with all Participant(s).
Course Evaluation. As a part of the final assessment each students make a written course evaluation and each study-group meet the assessment co-ordinator for an oral course evaluation. Pass or fail.
Course Evaluation. 8.1. The Facility must provide each Trainee with an opportunity to provide formative written feedback on the course and the instruction within the first 16 hours of the course, so that feedback may be used by the Trainer to adjust the course, as needed, to support the learning needs of the Trainees.
8.2. The Facility must provide each Trainee with an opportunity to anonymously evaluate the total course, and the instruction, so that feedback may be used by the Facility for continual improvement and/or to monitor customer satisfaction.
Course Evaluation. The results of any course evaluation are shared with the employee and placed on his files remain available electronically.