Common use of CONTINGENCY REPORTING Clause in Contracts

CONTINGENCY REPORTING. a. A report shall be made by telephone of any seepage from the disposal area immediately after it is discovered. A written report shall be filed with the Board within five days thereafter. This report shall contain the following information: 1) a map showing the location(s) of discharge; 2) approximate flow rate; 3) nature of effects; i.e., all pertinent observations and analyses; and 4) corrective measures underway or proposed. b. A report shall be made in writing to the Board within seven days of determining that a statistically significant increase occurred at a point of compliance (between a down gradient sample and a WQPS). Notification shall indicate what WQPS(s) has/have been exceeded. The discharger shall immediately re-sample at the compliance point where this difference has been found and reanalyze. c. If re-sampling and analysis confirms the earlier finding of a statistically significant increase between monitoring results and WQPS(s), the discharger must submit to the Board an amended Report of Waste Discharge as specified in Section 2550.8(k)(5) for establishment of an Evaluation Monitoring Program (EMP) meeting the requirements of Section 2550.4 of Chapter 15. d. Within 180 days of determining statistically significant evidence of a release, submit to the regional board an engineering feasibility study for a Corrective Action Program (CAP) necessary to meet the requirements of Section 2550.10. At a minimum, the feasibility study shall contain a detailed description of the corrective action measures that could be taken to achieve background concentrations for all constituents of concern.

CONTINGENCY REPORTING. a. A report shall be made by telephone of any seepage see page from the disposal area immediately after it is discovered. A written report shall be filed with the Board within five days thereafter. This report shall contain the following information: 1) a map showing the location(s) of discharge; 2) approximate flow rate; 3) nature of effects; i.e., all pertinent observations and analyses; and 4) corrective measures underway or proposed. b. A report shall be made in writing to the Board within seven days of determining that a statistically significant increase occurred at a point of compliance (between a down gradient sample and a WQPS). Notification shall indicate what WQPS(s) has/have been exceeded. The discharger shall immediately re-sample at the compliance point where this difference has been found and reanalyze. c. If re-sampling and analysis confirms the earlier finding of a statistically significant increase between monitoring results and WQPS(s), the discharger must submit to the Board an amended Report of Waste Discharge as specified in Section 2550.8(k)(5) for establishment of an Evaluation Monitoring Program (EMP) meeting the requirements of Section 2550.4 2550.9 of Chapter 15. d. Within 180 days of determining statistically significant evidence of a release, submit to the regional board an engineering feasibility study for a Corrective Action Program (CAP) necessary to meet the requirements of Section 2550.10. At a minimum, the feasibility study shall contain a detailed description of the corrective action measures that could be taken to achieve background concentrations for all constituents of concern2550.