Comparison Min Sample Clauses

Comparison Min max model and Lead-time model In this section the models are compared; the similarities and differences are discussed. In the Min-max model, a percentage of the parts gets a higher priority in the repair shop because the inventory level, INi, in the warehouse is below the minimum level. In the Lead-time model, almost the same effect can be reached. In this case some parts get a shorter lead-time which is indirectly also a higher priority, because in this case these parts are repaired earlier. The number of parts which get priority in both models must be almost equal to make a fair comparison. In the Min-max model the priority assignment is based on the inventory level of Ready- For-Use parts. Which is equal to the turn-around stock minus the number of parts in repair. The formula for the inventory level is given in Formula 6.1. The assignment of parts in the Lead-time model is based on the number of parts which are in repair and do not have a due-date which is within the emergency lead-time. This is related to the inventory level of Ready-For-Use parts. The formula for the inventory level in case of the Lead-time model is given in Formula 6.2. In both formulas the turn-around stock is fixed. In the case of Lead-time model the priority assignment is based on N1i. Therefore, the number of parts which are in the repair shop and have a due-date within the emergency lead-time (N2i) are not taken into account. In the Min-max situation these are included in Xi. INi = Si − Xi (6.1) 1 INi = Si − Ni − Ni (6.2) To make the difference in priority assignment even more clear, we will express the priority assignment of the Min-max model in a similar manner as in Lead-time model. When the number of parts in repair is greater or equal to the threshold, a part get priority in case of the Min-max model. In case of the Lead-time model, a part get an emergency lead-time, when the number of parts which do not have a due-date within the emergency lead-time is greater or equal to the threshold. A difference between the models is the number of priority levels. The repair shop in de Min-max model uses six different priority levels. This means that on six different places in the queue, a part can be inserted. In the Lead-time model there are only two options in the priority assignment; a regular lead-time and an emergency lead time. This means that in the Lead-time model there is less flexibility in the priority assignment. A difference between the models is of course the content of...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Comparison Min max As-Is - Lead-time As-Is In this section the Min-max As-Is situation is compared with the Lead-time As-Is situation. This comparison shows which interface agreement works better in case the actual parameter values for the turn-around stock and the minimum level are used. The investment cost are in this case equal to €9,119,108.3 In Appendix L, Table L.1 until L.4 all characteristics of the KPIs and other indicators of the two situations are displayed. In this section first, the performance of the main KPIs, EBO, Fill rate and Minrate are discussed, after this the performance of other indicators is mentioned. Expected backorders In Figure 7.1a the EBO for the two situations is displayed. From the figure it becomes clear that the EBO is the lowest in the Min-max As-Is situation for all different utilizations. Only for an utilization of 0.86 (C=95) the difference in EBO is not significant. The EBO, in case of the Min-max As-Is situation is almost the same for all utilizations. This can be explained by the choice of the model assumptions made in the repair shop. There is chosen to include the routings and SRU delays in the repair time. To reach a sufficient utilization the amount of servers needed is quite high. Apparently the priority rule in the Min-max model, responds quite adequate to the decreasing inventory at all different utilization rules. However the assumptions made with respect to the capacity are simplified extremely due to unavailability of data. Therefore the effect that the EBO remains stable for different utilization rate might be a slightly less in the real situation. However, it still indicates that the Min-Max Interface agreement is less sensitive to capacity changes. Fill rate In Figure 7.1b the fill rate for the two situations is displayed. The Min-max As-Is situation also has a higher fill rate in comparison to the Lead-time situation. This difference is always statistically significant except for a utilization of 0.86. Just as in case of the EBO, the fill rate is also almost stable for different utilization rates. The explanation for this is the same as in case of the EBO.
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Comparison Min

  • Mileage Measurement Where required, the mileage measurement for LIS rate elements is determined in the same manner as the mileage measurement for V&H methodology as outlined in NECA Tariff No. 4.

  • Revenue Metering The Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering will be located on the generator side of the 115kV breaker at the Xxxxx Solar Collector Substation and will consist of: • three (3) combination current/voltage transformer (“CT/VT”) units (manufacturer and model ABB/Xxxxxxx KXM-550, GE Grid Solutions KOTEF 000.XX, or other equivalent specified by Connecting Transmission Owner); and • one (1) revenue meter. The ratios of the CTs and VTs will be provided by Connecting Transmission Owner upon its review of the Interconnection Customer’s design documents. (Note: Connecting Transmission Owner’s revenue metering CTs and VTs cannot be used to feed the Interconnection Customer’s check meter.) SERVICE AGREEMENT NO. 2556

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Performance Expectation Provided the conditions are met under 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 proceeding, ALLTEL’s performance expectation is to provide 100% due dates met within reporting month. If service levels fall below 95% of the performance expectation within a reporting month, root cause analysis and joint problem resolution will be implemented within thirty (30) days.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Usage Measurement Usage measurement for calls shall begin when answer supervision or equivalent Signaling System 7 (SS7) message is received from the terminating office and shall end at the time of call disconnect by the calling or called subscriber, whichever occurs first.

  • Measurement Should the State terminate this contract as herein provided, no fees other than fees due and payable at the time of termination shall thereafter be paid to the Engineer. In determining the value of the work performed by the Engineer prior to termination, the State shall be the sole judge. Compensation for work at termination will be based on a percentage of the work completed at that time. Should the State terminate this contract under paragraph (4) or (5) above, the Engineer shall not incur costs during the thirty-day notice period in excess of the amount incurred during the preceding thirty days.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Temperature Measurement Temperature will be measured by the nearest automatic Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology Monitoring Station for example (but not limited to): Melbourne, Moorabbin, Dunns Hill, Melbourne Airport, Frankston, and Point Xxxxxx. At the commencement of each project, the onsite management and employee representatives shall agree which is to be the applicable automatic weather monitoring station.

  • Baseline For purposes of measuring a reduction in net tax revenue, the interim final rule measures actual changes in tax revenue relative to a revenue baseline (baseline). The baseline will be calculated as fiscal year 2019 (FY 2019) tax revenue indexed for inflation in each year of the covered period, with inflation calculated using the Bureau of Economic Analysis’s Implicit Price Deflator.163 FY 2019 was chosen as the starting year for the baseline because it is the last full fiscal year prior to the COVID– 162 See, e.g., Tax Policy Center, How do state earned income tax credits work?, https:// xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxx-xxxx/xxx-xx- state-earned-income-tax-credits-work/ (last visited May 9, 2021).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.