Climate Services Clause Samples
Climate Services. The term ‘climate services’ is relatively new and as such has no set definition. This report, as will the other deliverables of the EU-MACS project, will use the European Commission’s definition, which de- scribes climate services as: “the transformation of climate-related data—together with other relevant in- formation—into customised products such as projections, forecasts, information, trends, economic analysis, assessments (including technology assessment), counselling on best practices, development and evaluation of solutions and any other service in relation to climate that may be of use for the society at large. As such, these services include data, information and knowledge that support adaptation, mitigation and disaster risk management (DRM).” (DG for Research and Innovation 2015) Figure 2 visualises this definition. “In it, climate data services, referring to climate data records, projections, forecasts, and climate models, are separated from adaptation, mitigation, and disaster risk management services, which include vulnerability and risk analyses, recommendations for climate change action, and more refined information. The dotted line around the two boxes in the middle is meant to symbolise the fluidity of the CS boundaries.” (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 2017: 12)
Climate Services as niche phenomenon in its innovation context
Climate Services. The EU R&I landscape and the role of H2020 market research projects. MARCO & EU-MACS Kick-off meeting Paris, 23 November 2016. At: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇-▇▇▇▇.▇▇/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/MARCO_EU_MACS_ KO_APietrosanti_V1.pdf [1 September 2017] Pilniok, A. 2011. Governance im europäischen Forschungsförderverbund. Eine rechtswissenschaftliche Analyse der Forschungspolitik und Forschungsförderung im Mehrebenensystem. Tübingen: ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. 2016. Afterword. In: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇./▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇./▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, N. (eds.) 2016. The New Production of Users. Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies. London: Routledge, 325-334 Poessinouw, M. 2016. Initial definition, taxonomy, and report. Deliverable 2.1 for the MARCO (Market Research for a Climate Service Observatory) project (submitted to the European Commission; unpublished). ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇, M. 2009. Participatory Paradoxes. Facilitating Citizen Engagement in Science and Technology From the Top- Down? In: Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 4, 325-342 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇./▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇./▇▇▇▇▇▇, P. (eds.) 2015. Ending the fossil fuel era. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Pröpper, M. 2015. Emerging markets for nature and challenges for the ecosystem service approach. In: Development and Change, 46, 2, 247-268 PWC 2016. Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. 2016 Global Industry 4.0 Survey: What we mean by Industry 4.0 / Survey key findings / Blueprint for digital success. At: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇/▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇.▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇.▇-▇▇▇▇▇- ing-your-digital-enterprise-april-2016.pdf [21 October 2017] ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. 2011. Postnormal Science and the maturing of the structural contradictions of modern European science. In: Futures, 43, 2, 142-148 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, S. 2015. Knowledge brokerage designs and practices in four European climate services: A role model for biodiversity poli- cies? In: Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 513-521 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, H. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, C. 2014. Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions. In: Public Un- derstanding of Science, 23, 1, 107-120 Rip, A. 2012. The Context of Innovation Journeys. In: Creativity and Innovation Management, 21, 2, 158-170 Rip, A. 2006. Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists. In: Science as Culture, 15, 4, 349-365 ▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. 2008. Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios. In: ▇▇▇▇▇▇, E./▇▇▇▇▇, C./▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. (eds.) 2008. The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presen...
Climate Services. The University of Reading will lead a series of CHARMe implementation activities that will provide the basis for wider scale deployment. Working with the other partners and the archives held by ECMWF, Infoterra Ltd and Greek meteorological services, the results of this work package will show CHARMe in an operational context. ▇▇▇▇▇▇’s involvement in this work package will enable an efficient engineering response to feedback issues as they are raised. WP800 Outreach and Application. The UK Met Office will lead this work package that is critical to the future uptake of CHARMe. The project team has an important role in supporting this activity through representation in their national domains. Northern Europe is well represented and the involvement of SIH in Greece provides opportunities to promote CHARMe in the surrounding region.