Certainly Clause Samples
Certainly. Yes, we think the expedited judicial review provisions are a necessary component here, because one of the goals that we have is to get the spectrum into public use as expedi- tiously as possible.
Certainly. Provisions regarding ‘certainly’ are related to legal objects or objects in this case medical service, it is healing effort. A doctor must try to cure the patient's disease as best as possible. Legally, this usually involves inspanningverbintennis, meaning that doctors do not guarantee certainty that the disease will be cured. However, doctors are expected to be able to use their dedication and expertise to assist in healing efforts.
Certainly. If there is a position available and you have the skills, experience and background to fit the job, you can apply.
Certainly. The contract is with the management of the airline. The management of the airline would remain in place. Two-thirds of the managers are U.S. citizens. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. And the managers of the airline, certainly by negotiating a super majority from a foreign investor or foreign carrier, would give that foreign investor or foreign carrier a large say-so in the operation of the airline, including union contracts that exist today or that would expire and have to be renegotiated, is that correct? ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇. Sure. Yes, they would be participating in management. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Also, recognizing from the standpoint of the labor force, from the flight attendants to the pilots to the mechanics and so on, they have to believe, or isn't it reasonable to assume that labor in other countries where we may attract foreign investors, a foreign carrier in particular, is much cheaper in those countries than the union contracts call for today in the United States? Isn't it reasonable for them to assume that if it is cheaper to get labor from a foreign carrier who now has a large voice, if not total control over the operation of the U.S. airline, isn't it reasonable to assume that they are going to bring in the cheap labor? ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇. Number one, it is not self-evident that the labor is cheaper in other places, especially if you are talking about Europe. Second, U.S. airlines are still required to comply with FAA regulations in terms of having U.S. airmen, U.S. licensed crews on board. None of that would change by virtue of anything that we are doing in the NPRM, even if it were finalized. So it is not at all clear to me, sitting here now--again, we will take all of these comments very seriously--but not at all clear to me that there would be any change in the labor picture as a result of anything we are doing in the NPRM. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Mr. Chairman, I have other questions, but I will come back, hopefully, for another round. Mr. ▇▇▇▇. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇? ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Thank you, Mr. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. For our panelists, thank you very much for being here. I think this is helpful and informative. If the DOT rule were implemented, I have a question about how it would work. For example, when an airline debates whether or not to participate in the Civil Reserve Aviation Fleet, or if there is a question about the airline's security policy, how will foreign executives be handled in that? Will they be asked to leave the board room, or is there any practical way of truly separating foreign influence from...