BY EVALUATEE Sample Clauses

BY EVALUATEE. Evaluatee may also attach additional written response. If additional comments are attached, check here: Comments must be submitted in writing within five (5) working days. I certify that this report has been discussed with me. I understand that my signature does not necessarily indicate agreement. Evaluator’s Signature Date Evaluatee’s Signature Date APPENDIX E-8(a) SPEECH & LANGUAGE SPECIALIST GOAL SETTING FORM TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SPEECH & LANGUAGE SPECIALIST GOAL SETTING FORM Employee Name: Employee #: Site: Title/Subject/Grade Level: Employment Status: Temporary (Check one) Intern Probationary ( 0 1 2) Permanent Date of Conference: Evaluating Administrator:
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
BY EVALUATEE. Evaluatee may also attach additional written response. If additional comments are attached, check here: Comments must be submitted in writing within five (5) working days. I certify that this report has been discussed with me. I understand that my signature does not necessarily indicate agreement. Evaluator’s Signature Date Evaluatee’s Signature Date APPENDIX E-2(b) TEACHER EVALUATION REPORT CRITERIA Rating Scale: 4 = Exceeds District Standards 3 = Meets District Standards 2 = *Partially Meets District Standards (Requires Improvement) *Requires Comment 1 = *Does Not Meet District Standards (Unsatisfactory) *Requires Comment Standard I. Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning 4 3 2 1  Connecting students’ prior knowledge, life experience, and interests with learning goals. The teacher facilitates as students connect and apply their prior knowledge, life experiences and interests to new learning and the achievement of learning goals. The teacher builds on students’ questions and comments during lessons to modify instruction. The teacher makes substantial connections between the learning goals and the students’ prior knowledge, life experiences and interests. The teacher elicits and uses students' questions and comments during a lesson to extend their understanding. The teacher makes some connections between the learning goals and the students’ prior knowledge, life experiences and interests. The teacher elicits some questions from students during a lesson to monitor their understanding. The teacher makes no connections between the learning goals and the students’ prior knowledge, life experiences and interests. The teacher does not elicit student questions or comments during a lesson.  Using a variety of instructional strategies and resources to respond to students’ diverse needs. The teacher makes skillful use of a wide repertoire of instructional strategies to engage all students in learning, and makes adjustments while teaching to respond to students’ needs. The teacher uses a variety of instructional strategies that are appropriate to the students and the instructional goals. The teacher carries these strategies out thoughtfully and makes some adjustments to respond to students’ needs. The teacher uses a selection of instructional strategies that are largely appropriate to the students and the instructional goals, but they may lack variety or may not be responsive to students’ needs. The teacher uses instructional strategies, but they lack varie...
Sample 1

Related to BY EVALUATEE

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 11.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.