Assessment Testing and Evaluation Sample Clauses

Assessment Testing and Evaluation. Acro utilizes Kenexa Prove It! Skills Testing and Pre-Employment Assessments. Acro has access to the entire library of Kenexa assessment tests. All sub-contractors will also utilize the same tests when required. All tests are included in our pricing there are no additional fees for assessments Conversion, Direct Placement and Assessment/Training As a part of the Acro MSP Program for Maricopa County the following additional terms are included:
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Assessment Testing and Evaluation. Acro utilizes Kenexa Prove It! Skills Testing and Pre-Employment Assessments. Acro has access to the entire library of Kenexa assessment tests. All sub contractors will also utilize the same tests when required. All tests are included in our pricing there are no additional fees for assessments EXHIBIT A-6 IT Project SOW Pricing ALL STATES Position Category Job Position Regular XXX Xxxx Rate ‐ Low Regular XXX Xxxx Rate ‐ High IT Architect I $ 77.25 $ 89.33 IT Architect II $ 89.33 $ 100.64 IT Architect III $ 100.65 $ 114.47 IT Business Analyst I $ 57.49 $ 71.73 IT Business Analyst II $ 71.74 $ 86.12 IT Business Analyst III $ 86.12 $ 102.04 IT Business Intelligence Developer I $ 69.98 $ 79.85 IT Business Intelligence Developer II $ 79.86 $ 92.17 IT Business Intelligence Developer III $ 92.18 $ 109.46 IT C++ Programmer $ 47.45 $ 100.95 IT CADD Technician I $ 43.98 $ 53.61 IT CADD Technician II $ 53.63 $ 64.09 IT CADD Technician III $ 64.10 $ 74.78 IT Client/Server Specialist $ 79.84 $ 105.72 IT Computer Operator $ 30.40 $ 55.01 IT Data Communications Network Analyst $ 61.64 $ 112.95 IT Data Processing Operations Control $ 31.49 $ 70.54 IT Data Processing Planning Analyst II $ 45.43 $ 107.50 IT Data Warehouse Developer $ 35.66 $ 89.51 IT Database Administrator I $ 50.89 $ 59.16 IT Database Administrator II $ 59.17 $ 71.74 IT Database Administrator III $ 71.74 $ 87.21 IT Database Manager $ 87.21 $ 95.94 IT Database Specialist II $ 42.78 $ 62.99 IT Database Specialist III $ 63.07 $ 83.14 IT Database Modeler $ 72.43 $ 95.94 IT Development Manager $ 46.02 $ 96.41 IT Documentation Specialist $ 41.15 $ 98.68 IT E‐Commerce Solutions Architect $ 54.59 $ 98.68 IT EDP Planning Analyst $ 60.30 $ 108.34 IT ETL Programmer I $ 54.69 $ 64.05 IT ETL Programmer II $ 64.06 $ 73.94 IT ETL Programmer III $ 73.95 $ 94.83 IT GISs Specialist $ 85.32 $ 147.72 IT Internet Application Developer $ 42.78 $ 92.14 IT Java Programmer I $ 57.98 $ 72.40 IT Java Programmer II $ 72.41 $ 91.95 IT Java Programmer III $ 91.96 $ 107.02 IT LAN/WAN Administrator $ 39.91 $ 70.54 IT Mainframe Capacity Study $ 60.30 $ 98.34 IT Management Information Specialist $ 63.07 $ 83.14 IT MS SQL Server Administrator $ 46.59 $ 76.59 IT Network Administrator I $ 46.45 $ 57.06 IT Network Administrator II $ 57.07 $ 68.08 IT Network Administrator III $ 68.09 $ 79.52 IT Oracle Server Administrator $ 54.59 $ 103.30 IT Other Database Server Administrator $ 54.59 $ 103.30 IT PC LAN Technician $ 26.12 $ 52.49 IT Programmer ...
Sample 1

Related to Assessment Testing and Evaluation

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Report on Assessment of Compliance and Attestation (a) On or before March 1 of each calendar year, commencing in 2007, the Servicer shall:

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.