Air Quality Study Clause Samples

Air Quality Study. LAWA shall fund a study by an Independent Expert of toxic air contaminants and criteria air pollutant emissions from jet engine exhaust and other emission sources (“Air Quality Study”). In addition to other contaminant and pollutant emissions, the Air Quality Study shall measure jet engine exhaust emissions and provide chemical composition data from a representative sample of engine types and ages under a variety of conditions that reflect actual operations, and shall include this data and all other relevant study results as part of the final study provided to LAWA.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Air Quality Study. We will prepare an air quality assessment for the project. Conformity with the Clean Air Act for regional operational emissions will be demonstrated by documenting that the project is consistent with the air quality analysis of the SANDAG Regional Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan. Local emissions will be addressed in accordance with Caltrans Transportation Project Level Carbon Monoxide (CO)
View SourceView Similar (3)
Air Quality Study. This study was designed to better understand the causes of increasing episodes of unhealthy levels of ozone in CAVE.
View Source
Air Quality Study. PA shall fund a study by an Independent Expert of toxic air contaminants and criteria air pollutant emissions from jet engine exhaust and other emission sources (“Air Quality Study”).
View Source
Air Quality Study. CONSULTANT shall prepare an air quality study. Assuming the CITY is the CEQA Lead Agency, an Air Quality Technical Report that meets Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans requirements for SIP conformity are not necessary. This study will then follow methods recommended in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. The study will include the following: • Setting. Briefly describe setting conditions. Develop baseline conditions that describe meteorology/climate of the project area, existing air quality conditions, federal, state and local air quality rules and regulations, and approved air quality plans. Air pollutants and their impact on human health will also be described. • Regional Air Quality Impacts. Identify any applicable SIP conformity requirements for the project that pertain to air quality. Model changes in emissions associated with construction and operation using the appropriate versions of the CalEEMod and EMFAC models. The operational analysis will be based on the availability of traffic data. Compare emissions to significance thresholds. If project is included in the TIP, then operational emissions will only be provided for information purposes only. Transportation projects included in a TIP found to conform to the region’s air quality planning assumptions are assumed to have less-than-significant regional air quality impacts. • CO Hot Spot Analysis. Conduct a qualitative Hot Spot CO analysis based on the screening guidance provided by BAAQMD that is based on traffic volume. • Community Risk Impacts. Both construction and operation of the project will be evaluated for impacts associated with toxic air contaminants (TACs) that could be emitted during construction and operation of the project. Since residences are near the project, a health risk assessment is proposed that will include emissions modeling based on CalEEMod and dispersion modeling using AERMOD and meteorological data for San ▇▇▇▇. Operational impacts associated with traffic using the new roadway will be based on BAAQMD local roadway screening tables. This analysis will provide predicted levels of increased cancer risk, annual PM2.5 concentrations and non-cancer hazards. • Assess Project GHG Emissions. Changes to greenhouse gas emissions will be based on the CalEEMod and EMFAC modeling described above. These emissions will be evaluated against BAAQMD thresholds and City policies (i.e., GHG Reduction Strategy).
View Source
Air Quality Study. The CONSULTANT will prepare an Air Quality Analysis to address local and regional impacts on sensitive land uses. The analysis will be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference. Baseline and project setting meteorological and air quality data developed through the California Air Resources Board (ARB) and climatological and air quality profile data gathered by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District will be utilized for the description of existing ambient air quality. Most recent published air quality data from the air quality monitoring stations nearest to the project site for the past three years will be included to help highlight existing air quality in the vicinity of the project site. Other sources such as regulatory documents, professional publications, and past experience in the project area will supplement background information. The CONSULTANT will estimate construction emissions based on construction information available and provided. In addition, standard dust suppression measures identified by COUNTY guidelines will be identified to minimize construction impacts. The Air Quality Analysis will document whether the proposed project is included in the latest Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), and Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) for preliminary engineering/environmental documentation. The air quality analysis will make a final determination whether the build alternatives will conform to applicable state and federal air quality plans. The proposed project’s short-term construction and long-term operational impact on global warming and climate change will be discussed. • Draft/Final Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report • Draft/Final Air Quality Study
View Source
Air Quality Study. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ will prepare an air quality report evaluating the air impacts potential air mitigation measures for the proposed project As part of the analysis, we will collect air quality setting information and quantify construction emissions as required by the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District Construction emission estimates will be based on project-specific on the CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, and on state and federal heavy duty construction equipment emission factors. We will use the significance thresholds to determine the project would result in significant air impacts. Where feasible, mitigation measures be identified for any significantair impacts. Since the project is a federally road project, we will evaluate whether the project meets transportation requirements. As the project does not involve increasing capacity on the roadway, the completed project is not expected to have an impact on microscale air concentrations in the project area. However, we will use the guidelines stated in the Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol to evaluate the impact of carbon monoxide concentrations at sensitive receptors near the project. We assume that aerial photographs of the project site (at a scale of 1 inch equals feet or less) showing air sensitive uses residences, schools) within 1,000 feet of the roadway will be provided to ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ before the analysis begins.
View Source

Related to Air Quality Study

  • Air Quality To the extent applicable, Consultant must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and/or California Air Resources Board (CARB). Although the SCAQMD and CARB limits and requirements are more broad, Consultant shall specifically be aware of their application to "portable equipment", which definition is considered by SCAQMD and CARB to include any item of equipment with a fuel-powered engine. Consultant shall indemnify City against any fines or penalties imposed by SCAQMD, CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Consultant, its subconsultants, or others for whom Consultant is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • CEQA Activities funded under this Grant Agreement, regardless of funding source, must be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) Any work that is subject to CEQA and funded under this Agreement shall not proceed until documents that satisfy the CEQA process are received by the DWR Grant Manager and the State has completed its CEQA compliance. Work funded under this Agreement that is subject to a CEQA document shall not proceed until and unless approved by the Department of Water Resources. Such approval is fully discretionary and shall constitute a condition precedent to any work for which it is required. If CEQA compliance by the Grantee is not complete at the time the State signs this Agreement, once the State has considered the environmental documents, it may decide to require changes, alterations, or other mitigation to the Project; or to not fund the Project. Should the State decide to not fund the Project, this Agreement shall be terminated in accordance with Paragraph 10, “Default Provisions.”

  • Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention and Control The hospital in consultation with the Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC) shall develop, establish and put into effect, musculoskeletal prevention and control measures, procedures, practices and training for the health and safety of employees.

  • Feasibility Study Buyer is granted the right to conduct engineering and/or market and economic feasibility studies of the Property and a physical inspection of the Property, including studies or inspections to determine the existence of any environmental hazards or conditions (collectively, the “Feasibility Study”) during the period (the “Feasibility Period”) commencing on the Effective Date and ending at 5:00 p.m., Central Time, on the June 3, 2010. With Seller’s permission, after Seller has received advance notice sufficient to permit it to schedule in an orderly manner Buyer’s examination of the Property and to provide at least 24-hours’ advance written notice to any affected tenants, Buyer or its designated agents may enter upon the Property during normal business hours for purposes of analysis or other tests and inspections which may be deemed necessary by Buyer for the Feasibility Study. Buyer or its designated representative must be accompanied by a designated representative of Seller or have received Seller’s written permission prior to entering upon the Property in connection with Buyer’s Feasibility Study; provided, however, Buyer may not enter into any space leased by any tenant without being accompanied by a designated representative of Seller. Seller agrees to make its representative reasonably available during normal business hours. Buyer will not alter the physical condition of the Property or conduct invasive testing without notifying Seller of its requested tests, and obtaining the written consent of Seller to any physical alteration of the Property or invasive testing. Buyer will utilize commercially reasonable diligence to conduct or cause to be conducted all inspections and tests in a manner and at times which will not unreasonably interfere with any tenant’s use and occupancy of the Property. If Buyer determines, in its sole judgment, that the Property is not suitable for any reason for Buyer’s intended use or purpose, or is not in satisfactory condition, then Buyer may terminate this Contract by written notice to Seller prior to expiration of the Feasibility Period, in which case the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Money (other than the Option Money) will be returned to Buyer, and neither party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder other than as set forth herein with respect to rights or obligations which survive termination. If this Contract is not terminated pursuant to this Section 5(a), then after expiration of the Feasibility Period, after Seller has received advance notice sufficient to permit it to schedule in an orderly manner Buyer’s examination of the Property and to provide at least 24-hours’ advance written notice to any affected tenants, Buyer or its designated agents may enter upon the Property during normal business hours. Buyer or its designated representative must be accompanied by a designated representative of Seller or have received Seller’s written permission prior to entering upon the Property; provided, however, Buyer may not enter into any space leased by any tenant without being accompanied by a designated representative of Seller. If this Contract is not timely terminated pursuant to this Section 5(a), Buyer’s right to terminate this Contract pursuant to this Section 5(a) and any and all objections with respect to the Feasibility Study will be deemed to have been waived by Buyer for all purposes.