Additional Value Sample Clauses

Additional Value. The action prescribed in this proposal will build on the plans articulated in the 13-19 Strategy, the JAR Action Plan and the CYP Plan by focusing on specific needs to raise standards faster and for a wider range of young people. The core delivery mechanism will be through Campus Calderdale. This is a collaborative partnership of; the LA, LSC, Connexions, Schools, Calderdale College and Work Based learning Provider representatives. Campus Calderdale has a clear governance and accountability structure that links well with all partners. It is jointly funded by all partners and delivers against an agreed policy and strategy that places the needs of young people rather than institutions. The framework of collaborative delivery will be used for quality assurance, monitoring, evaluation and delivery. This priority directly links to the regeneration and skills agenda. It will enhance the life chances of a significant number of young people because the activity is universal so gains should be seen to approximately 2700 young people per year that are engaged in GCE courses in Calderdale. The LSC, Connexions, the LA, schools and the college have been consulted through the Campus Calderdale framework about this process and are enthusiastic that it meets collaborative aspirations. The priority will be monitored by existing systems, which tie closely with partner governance and which are all linked to the Councils ambition statement. Campus Calderdale is rapidly developing the alignment of existing performance management systems. The Management Information functions of Connexions, LSC, LA and individual partners will be used to monitor progress. The 13-19 strategy group will direct the action of officers and commission work linked to identified priorities and based upon evaluation of impact to date. The percentage of young people gaining national level 2 qualification by the age of 19 The achievement of young people aged 19 in Calderdale is a priority identified in: LA self assessment for the Joint Area Review in September 2005 LSC Strategic Area Review of West Yorkshire in June 2004 The achievement of Level 2 by young people at 19 places should be considered alongside priority 1b because it ensures a high level of functionality for young people and ensures that more young people are capable of achieving independence and economic well being. In order to address this issue action is already identified in the Children and Young Peoples Plan, the Joint Area Review Action ...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Additional Value. How the Supplier can offer additional value to the Customer in addition to the listed requirements and relative to competing Suppliers. Please make unambiguous references to the relevant sections in Appendix 2 that show how the offered Solution provides added value and better goal achievement for the Customer. Please provide a response in Appendix 2, section 4. 5 FUNCTIONAL/USER REQUIREMENTS‌ This chapter describes roles, a selection of “every-day” case examples, and user stories to exemplify functional requirements and deliveries from the perspective of a live streaming origin. NRK believes that the Suppliers are best suited to suggest the best solutions to meet our requirements, therefor we have described case examples and user stories for the Supplier to answer.
View Source

Related to Additional Value

  • Market Value Adjustment Transfer of Current Value from the Funds or AG Account ............ 17 3.08 Notice to the Certificate Holder .................................. 18 3.09 Loans ............................................................. 18 3.10 Systematic Withdrawal Option (SWO) ................................ 18 3.11

  • Additional Payment In addition to any Spousal Support, in the event of Divorce: (check one)

  • Appraised Value If an Objecting Party objects in writing to the Initial Valuation within ten (10) days after its receipt of the Valuation Notice, the Objecting Party, within fourteen (14) days from the date of such written objection, shall engage an Independent Appraiser (the “First Appraiser”) to determine within thirty (30) days of such engagement the Fair Market Value of the Partnership Interests (the “First Appraised Value”). The cost of the First Appraiser shall be borne by the Objecting Party. If the First Appraised Value is at least eighty percent (80%) of the Initial Value and less than or equal to one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Initial Value, then the Purchase Price shall be the average of the Initial Value and the First Appraised Value. If the First Appraised Value is less than eighty percent (80%) of the Initial Value or more than one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Initial Value, then the Partnership and the Objecting Party shall, within fourteen (14) days from the date of the First Appraised Value, mutually agree on and engage a second Independent Appraiser (the “Final Appraiser”). The cost of the Final Appraiser shall be borne equally by the Partnership and the Objecting Party. The Final Appraiser shall determine within thirty (30) days after its engagement the Fair Market Value of the Partnership Interests, but if such determination is less than the lesser of the Initial Value and the First Appraised Value then the lesser of the Initial Value and the First Appraised value shall be the value or if such determination is greater than the greater of the Initial Value and the First Appraised Value then the greater of the Initial Value and the First Appraised Value shall be the value (the “Final Valuation”). The Purchase Price shall be equal to the Final Valuation and shall be final and binding upon the parties to this Agreement for purposes of the subject transaction.

  • Target Fair Market Value The Company agrees that the Target Business that it acquires must have a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in the Trust Account at the time of signing the definitive agreement for the Business Combination with such Target Business (excluding taxes payable and the Deferred Underwriting Commissions). The fair market value of such business must be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company based upon standards generally accepted by the financial community, such as actual and potential sales, earnings, cash flow and book value. If the Board of Directors of the Company is not able to independently determine that the target business meets such fair market value requirement, the Company will obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions with respect to the satisfaction of such criteria. The Company is not required to obtain an opinion as to the fair market value if the Company’s Board of Directors independently determines that the Target Business does have sufficient fair market value.

  • Inability to Determine Applicable Interest Rate In the event that Administrative Agent shall have determined (which determination shall be final and conclusive and binding upon all parties hereto), on any Interest Rate Determination Date with respect to any Eurodollar Rate Loans, that by reason of circumstances affecting the London interbank market adequate and fair means do not exist for ascertaining the interest rate applicable to such Loans on the basis provided for in the definition of Adjusted Eurodollar Rate, Administrative Agent shall on such date give notice (by telefacsimile or by telephone confirmed in writing) to Borrower and each Lender of such determination, whereupon (i) no Loans may be made as, or converted to, Eurodollar Rate Loans until such time as Administrative Agent notifies Borrower and Lenders that the circumstances giving rise to such notice no longer exist, and (ii) any Funding Notice or Conversion/Continuation Notice given by Borrower with respect to the Loans in respect of which such determination was made shall be deemed to be rescinded by Borrower.